The 1st hit footage from the Naudet snuff film shows anything BUT a large Boeing commercial jet. Indeed, it look much more like a missile exiting the opposite side of the North Tower
http://www.8thestate.com/?page_id=54
http://thewebfairy.com/911/911/

So does foootage of the 2nd hit at the south Tower:
http://thewebfairy.com/911/missileout/index.htm

There was obvious CGI cartoonery used to fake the 2nd hit (south Tower), which was broadcast by the networks on the morning of 9/11 and afterwards
http://thewebfairy.com/911/ghostplane/index.htm
http://thewebfairy.com/911/

There is no evidence of hijacked Boeing commercial jets hitting either of the Towers on 9/11.
Other than the claims of some easily discredited "eyewitnesses".
If the "planes" were moving at 500mph (as claimed by the OCT) then how the hell could any "witness" be even remotely certain of what was "seen" ?

Conversely, there is plenty of evidence for use of unconventional weapons to take the Towers down:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directed-energy_weapon
http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/
The "toasted cars" are just the tip of the iceberg.
http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/StarWarsBeam5.html#toasted

There is even some evidence of unconventional weapons use at WTC7, although the network broadcast videos of that morning show what appears to be a conventional demolition of WTC7.
http://web.knoxnews.com/advertising/wtc/2699.html

So we probably have a mix of both conventional and unconventional weapons use at Ground Zero.

I guess you consider that premise to be confusing and divisive ...
Especially for the thousands of gutless zombie New Yorkers who ALREADY know that the Towers and WTC7 were blown up
.... yet refuse to speak out even now...

Their "difficulties" are not scientific, intellectual or conceptual.
Those thousands of complicit New Yorkers ("good Germans" all) have ETHICAL and MORAL problems with the very notion of truth.

I dont' even want to begin getting into the minds of the firemen and cops ..
who KNOW already, in basic detail, what went down on 9/11.

Perhaps your mission in life is to function as an apologist for those thousands of New Yorkers.
Now they can all pretend that the reason it took them so long to "figure out what really happened" is the "difficulty" posed by evidence of unconventional weapons and naked media fakery.

As for the individuals whom I tag as gatekeepers: individuals such as Steve Jones, David Kubiak, Alex Floum, Fred Burks .....

They are transparent shills and plants,.
With very real conflicts of interest and compromised backgrounds.
Just follow their history and their money flow in grants, clients and contracts.
Burks is the most transparent one of all.

I don't know what your real motives are Albanese.

I just know that everytime I watched you interviewed on FOX (which seemed to give you an inordinate amount of face time) you were incompetent.
You floundered and flummoxed before the camera and utterly failed to present any kind of coherent narrative for what happened on 9/11.

Just as Steve Jones utterly failed on Tucker Carlson (and in other public media venues). Indeed, Jones made the movement look terrible by his abject and unprincipled surrender to the BYU authorities ... he took the cash payoff with his "retirement" ....
utterly failing to defend the most basic notions of academic freedom;
paving the way for dozens of vulnerable untentured academics (without the resources of a Jones or a Floum or a Burks)
to be harassesd, dismissed, victimized ......

You're damn right I have a grudge against Jones.
It's not just the "science" or the "evidence".
It's his rotten, corrupt politics.

I'm retiring from this argument.
I've had enough .... this is only making me angrier.
You win.
Congratulations.