Some excellent stuff to cut up for my tube

(Conspiracy Central says this .torrent file has a Trojan built in, and is recommending deleting the file upon download. If anyone else has a link to a clean version of the file, please post a link in the comments section.)

200 minutes of CNN from 11. sept. 2001.

I did post this but unfortunateley I was too shook up from trying to
watch this saddening shift to remember posting the link

That's a .torrent

Gangster, how big is the file?

Thanks Gangster

Rep, it's 683MB.

For those who need it:

"We are going to keep up this fight till the end, till the very end... They took it from the top to the bottom. We're gonna take it from the bottom to the top!"
-Dan Wallace

Putting together a criminal case.

Add it to the growing list of evidence against the official version of 9/11. This court case is going to get real interesting.

All Lawyers wanted.

where's the download link?

where's the download link?

The Eleventh Day of Every Month

couldn't help but notice this:

Some goof wannabe named cyberhacker665 has uploaded a TROJAN to this tracker!
It has been downloaded and verified by ConCen staff to be a trojan, not the claimed windows hack/fix.
If you downloaded this file, DO NOT OPEN IT!!!! DELETE IT IMMEDIATELY!!!


///////////////////// - $1 DVDs shipped - email for info

Some stuff of use for criminal cases


I don´t see CC mentioning any trojans in connection with this file and they track the file just fine. So it's just nonsense.

More on how the 911 fable was implanted

"""1. MSNBC presented an elaborately detailed story about the lifestyle and anti-US philosophy of Osama bin Laden - while both towers were still burning and long before Bin Laden had been accused by anyone.

2. Fox News featured a "man in the street" eye witness who explained in strangely formal language the science behind why the towers collapsed when most engineers and firemen were utterly baffled and in shock by what had just taken place.

3. CBS featured a Bush administration insider (and not identified as such) as a guest who actively worked to dissuade Dan Rather (and viewers) from speculating that there must have been explosive charges placed in the buildings for them to have collapsed the way they did.

How was it that these stories - based on no fact, no research and no inquirry - appeared in full blown form so quickly on US news networks and then became part of the core myths of what happened on 9/11?

Were these stories prepared in advance?

There's an old intelligence saying that "once is happenstance, twice is coincidence, but three times is enemy action."

Because most of these clips ran only once and were not repeated after they'd done their job, it made it difficult, if not impossible, for viewers to analyze them critically."""

Clip: 911solution