BBC's 9-11 TV Program and article debunked

The BBC's Conspiracy Files 9-11 article and TV program get debunked at length. Both were dishonest hit pieces.

The program aired yesterday on UK television, BBC2. (18th Feb).

An .avi rip is available on the

Conspiracy Central has an .avi (DivX) file of the show on their tracker;

Debunking video required

What we need now is a debunking video which takes the original BBC show spliced with debunking sequences; showing what manipulative methods are being used at each point in the video.

BTW, great analysis!

I would be

happy to contribute some of my limited $ to such an effort. It has to be done quickly though. Striking irons hot stuff, eh?

A hit piece from the MSM.... who woulda thunk?

Another very good critique of the BBC psyops was done by Winter Patriot:

BTW, the folks were are fighting care not one whit for the truth, nor for what we in the movement think. They achieved their goal by further insulating the masses from ever even considering the truth. It is, of course, obvious and already known to posters here, that the puppet masters are very good at this game. They have succeeded for years in keeping the vast majority of humans ignorant of the strings that bind. I worry that they will continue to do so until it is too late to forestall them. They control the bulk of the weapons.

It's a good analysis.

The BBC seeks to shield us from the evil "Loose Change" but consistently offers up misinformation as a replacement.

Gee, thanks, BBC!

BBC Conspiracy test

Do you trust everything you are told or do you think there is usually truth in conspiracies?

Psychologist Dr Patrick Leman, of the Royal Holloway University of London, has devised a test to see how conspiratorial you are.

Once you have answered all 15 questions press submit and we will calculate your score. You will then be able to read Dr Leman's analysis

22:24 -23:19

If the 'great and good' government and it's propaganda arm, the MSM, doesn't sanction something,....that runs counter to their corporate sponsors' interests/crimes..., to be true....then we must be these marginalized, "little nutty", 'CONSPIRACY THEORISTS"....

ooooh, away, run away.....


George Orwell, a nation turns it's lonely eyes to you....

Can I see That Video of WTC7 again, please?.....ah, yes...


Tell me something I don't know.


Your responses suggest you have a high level of belief in conspiracy theories. You might have reason not to trust others, even people close to you. You may also feel that you are an outsider in terms of society and the political and business decisions that large organisations make.

The true threat to liberty comes not from terrorists but from our political leaders whose natural inclination is to seize upon any excuse to diminish them.
~~ Walter Williams, Nightly Business Report, September 2001

Show "You aced the test" by murph

Sod that...this is the same

Sod that...this is the same lame test that was available after the Nation article.

What was your score, murph?

Impeachment. Accountability. A better world.


Some valuable people add valuable testimonies to the truth movement:
Go on digg and search for 9/11 or Bin Laden , and push the important stories you find!

Read the last genius on this Earth:

Another avi-rip can be

good find :-)

good find :-)

Passenger Mannifest

From Debunking the BBC's 9-11 Conspiracy Files:
"It is interesting to note which points are missing from the BBC's analysis of the alternative 9-11 investigations.

Some of these include the passenger lists which do not include the 19 Arabs named as responsible"

I keep hearing this over and over again but I know I saw the photocopied passenger lists presented in the Zacharias Musawi trial. These lists contained all of the hijackers as far as I know. I can't find copies anymore; does anyone have a link to these lists or remember seeing them?


Did i see this right?

I'm a UK citizen.
I thought you guys had it bad with coverups. But the fact the BBC has to try and make sure that british citizens keep their minds closed aswell upsets me just a little.
So this is what i saw.
We have an hour long program. We can find a few people to speak out against a few theories. Then we can forget about the big ones, Cause they are pretty hard to cover up.
We can waste about 5 minutes having a walkaround of the short change peoples home and office. Because thats critical in the whole story of course.
To think some people saw that and probably said "Well thats that then, I feel a lot brighter for that. Mystery no more...." makes me sick.
I would love to see a video made to debunk that program. What i would love the most is for the BBC to play that instead.

Great idea

"I would love to see a video made to debunk that program. What i would love the most is for the BBC to play that instead."

It's actually a really good idea. AJ should do it. Needn't be a slick high-budget affair; just Interview all the folks who should have been interviewed, debunk the debunkers on the points raised, mention the smoking guns ommitted, and highlight the countless propaganda techniques used by the filmmakers. Could make it a case study in propaganda and completely discredit the BBC. They would never play it, of course, but it could go viral in the manner of Loose Change and wake alot of people up to the true nature of their media lapdogs -- I mean "watchdogs".

I think the BBC might of just forever ruined its reputation (or what's left of it). Accessories after the fact.

The Eleventh Day of Every Month

Emmanuel Goldstein stated

the same above. I replied to him I'd contribute some $ - I am pretty poor but would contribute a 100 bucks.

Oops, now I am on record.....

Spencer in Salt Lake

I know, that was just silly. They spent all their time on the fringe, speculative theories. Honestly I have researched 9/11 for 2 years, and Fetzer's statement was THE FIRST TIME I had every heard anyone claim that the C-1380 was remote-controlling the plane that hit the pentagon.

They then find a witness, who quite frankly seemed honest and believable to me, to completely refute this so-characterized "pillar of 9/11 conspiracy belief".

This was practically a clinic on straw-man, emotion-appealing debunking and avoiding elephant-in-the-room hard-core information.

Fetzer did SOOO much more harm than good with this documentary. It's almost as if his statements are being "tailor-made" for straw-man debunking.

I think this film, unfortunately, will be very effective with people who have not looked into 9/11 alternative theories at all, and create a great deal of fear and stigmatization of those who have and know that the official narrative is untrue.

Time for more letters....

to the BBC. Let them know we thing their 9/11 show was rubbish. I've already sent two, join me.

I don't think they care a whit

about letters. Do you?

The movie idea is good though. 'cept I haven't a clue as to who could do it credibly and would be willing to do so. Any thoughts anyone?

I don't know if I have the

I don't know if I have the required crediblity, but I could do it. It would probably be similar in tone and style, as well as much of the info to my first video "9-11 Coincidence Theory".

It would not be anything slick though, just powerpoint slides, audio and FACTS.

Too bad they didn't...

Make the results of that "test" available as a poll. I maintain that most people would test at a minimum in the "medium belief in conspiracies" category.

Most people believe that JFK was an organized conspiracy, and most people can see with their own eyes that government serves the interests of a few.

If this is the measuring stick, then anyone with basic common sense is a "conspiracy nut".

Good job on the debunking articke, that was quick!

I hope if there is a film made it will mirror that article, it would be very effective.