Who would have guessed there were two George Monbiots writing for the Guardian?

I have copied: this significant find by 'vw' on RI. He wrote: I don't know the exact ettequette for posting like this but thought this was worth knowing by all (I hadn't seen anything like this earlier on 911blogger so if it is a duplicate of this information, I'm sorry).

---------- his entry:

Who would have guessed there were two George Monbiots writing for the Guardian?

http://www.guardian.co.uk/Columnists/Column/0,5673,574809,00.html

Quote:
There are plenty of reasons to be sceptical. The magical appearance of the terrorists' luggage, passports and flight manual looks rather too good to be true. The dossier of "evidence" purporting to establish Bin Laden's guilt consists largely of supposition and conjecture. The ration packs being dropped on Afghanistan have no conceivable purpose other than to create the false impression that starving people are being fed. Even the anthrax scare looks suspiciously convenient. Just as the hawks in Washington were losing the public argument about extending the war to other countries, journalists start receiving envelopes full of bacteria, which might as well have been labelled "a gift from Iraq". This could indeed be the work of terrorists, who may have their own reasons for widening the conflict, but there are plenty of other ruthless operators who would benefit from a shift in public opinion.

I apologize again. I messed up the introduction

It shoudl read: I have copied: this significant find by 'vw' on RI. I don't know the exact ettequette for posting like this but thought this was worth knowing by all (I hadn't seen anything like this earlier on 911blogger so if it is a duplicate of this information, I'm sorry).

He wrote: etc.

So he performed the Doug Thompson...

Somewhat understandable, in case the alternative was performing the Hunter Thompson, but still - you don't get offed for writing nothing, which would have been a viable choice for Monbigot.

Great find. Monbiot bends

Great find. Monbiot bends like a blade of grass in the wind. The only "movement" he has been forwarding his entire life, to reference his earlier editorial, has been his own self-importance. This proves it.

The charge of

The charge of "anti-Americanism" is itself profoundly anti-American. If the US does not stand for freedom of thought and speech, for diversity and dissent, then we have been deceived as to the nature of the national project. Were the founding fathers to congregate today to discuss the principles enshrined in their declaration of independence, they would be denounced as "anti-American" and investigated as potential terrorists. Anti-American means today precisely what un-American meant in the 1950s. It is an instrument of dismissal, a means of excluding your critics from rational discourse.

/////////////////////
911dvds@gmail.com - $1 DVDs shipped - email for info

Great Find! Wow!

Let's take this to the Guardian comment page ASAP!

already did - i read the

already did - i read the blog by Laukev, which had his words quoted from a previous article...

posted my comment here: http://911blogger.com/node/6349#comment

this stuff is

this stuff is great-----going and posting where it matters!!

look how bbc is having to retract ====

i know it seems shallow but it is great
watching this amazing coordinated cyber overthrow

these are dangerous times though nevertheless...