Dear BBC

Contact BBC World here:

Dear BBC,

The head of your division, Richard Porter has just given the world a disgraceful response to a matter of enormous importance and seriousness.

The fact that your New York reporter said that the Salomon Brothers Building (WTC7) had collapsed a full 20 minutes before it had, with accompanying graphic, should be cause for a thorough investigation of how that information came to be in the heads of your personnel. This investigation does not appear to be in evidence. No serious effort, apart from allegedly asking the reporter to recall, seems to have taken place.

Next, in the realm of absurdity beyond belief, your department head claims that the BBC has LOST the tapes of September 11th coverage!

This might seem more plausible if the BBC hadn't been pressuring Google Video to remove the clip all day yesterday. No. This seems like a flat out lie designed to cover up your original "cock up" whereby you told the world that a building had collapsed even though it remains 'in the shot' behind your reporter's head. That particular "cock up" actually has evidence to back it up, unlike the claim by Richard Porter that this particular bit of footage has mysteriously disappeared, with no back up copy available.

What utter nonsense.


1) Is it BBC policy to keep only 1 copy of your reports?

2) What sort of backup regime do you employ?

3) What OTHER tapes from September 11th 2001 New York are allegedly missing as of today?

4) Where are the reporter's notes and scripts from that report? What other data exists that bears upon the report that the Salomon Brothers Building (WTC 7) had collapsed as of 5:00pm on 9/11?

5) What data exists regarding your New York reporter's live feed dropping off 5 minutes before the ACTUAL collapse of the WTC 7 building?

In closing, independent investigators haven't accused the BBC of participating in a "conspiracy" as your irresponsible head, Porter, misrepresents. We have focused on the evidence broadcast as a possible indication that there existed a conspiracy to deliberately demolish building WTC 7, and other buildings, and that a "cock up" revealed prior knowledge by some parties of this building's demolition.

If Richard Porter cannot differentiate between factual claims and persecution, then he probably is not qualified to run an important news organization like the BBC. His reliance on an anonymous sarcastic remark from Youtube as a source in this matter is shocking and revealing of bias and a pathetic resorting to non-factual arguments.

If BBC employs an Ombudsman or Inspector General, please forward this matter to them immediately for a fair and honest look at what really happened, devoid of "the dog ate my videotape" excuses, and infantile sarcasm.

John Doraemi publishes Crimes of the State Blog

Also send a COMPLAINT

70 Disturbing Facts About 9/11

John Doraemi publishes Crimes of the State Blog

johndoraemi --at--


Also you can E mail to the trustee


"Carlos" says:

The bbc's other news outlet, NEWS24 also reported it had collapsed at 4.57, and this time there is a time stamp:

I've uploaded it to you tube, just taking a moment for it to show.. I'll update this post when it does:

but you can download the orrig vid here: (link underneath on right to download it)

The time is 21:55, which is British time 9:55pm. Please confirm that 9:55 British = 4:55pm NYC on September 11.

70 Disturbing Facts About 9/11

John Doraemi publishes Crimes of the State Blog

johndoraemi --at--


yes we got em good an proper: oh and it was at 4.54!!

Great find.

This shows that that this "too early press release" must have been accepted in a central place to penetrate the BBC news organisation.

as far as where they were

as far as where they were getting the script from
and who was giving it.......

the cfr did 911----they have infiltrators in all the agencies and govts

that was their bid for total world power

the internet put them in check

now everyone is finding out

we're paddling out of this nonsense
kissinger and cheney gave the bbc the information
they have fallen from the heights now---

they are in big trouble-----the case against them is solid---

in the eyes of the brotherhood of mankind----
-----------with the cfr out of the way..the world has a future of infinite possiblity for all!!

very exciting----a bit too exciting actually
but this too will pass

Is Ted Turner CFR? Did this

Is Ted Turner CFR? Did this story not break on CNN?
Wouldnt that make all other news orgs. take their lead and report the same (although we are trying to confirm, ect, ect, ect..) Are not Rueters and the AP the primary source of "feed" that BBC refers to?