Masterminds of 9-11- Impeach them!

If we examine Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld were doing on 9-11, one must conclude that they were all part of a plot to stage a "false flag" operation, to lay the groundwork for the rest of their evil plans. If 3000 people had to die,- oh well, you can't make an omelet without breaking eggs.

Bush, the pResident, was not surprised. So he must have had prior knowledge. The #1 terrorist target was sitting unprotected in an elementary school classroom, reading "My pet goat", and went on doing that for 7 minutes after being told "we're under attack". Evidently the Secret Service was not worried about his safety, so they knew it wasn't an enemy attack. Evidently "The Decider" didn't feel the need to take command, get on the phone to NORAD and assess the situation, scramble fighter jets to intercept the other 3 planes, which were quickly identified as being off course... The Commander-in-Chief was either derelict in his duty or in on the plot. Either way, he should be impeached.

Dick Cheney, the Vice pResident, was in the Situation Room of the White House, monitoring a CIA simulation of planes crashing into buildings "by a bizarre coincidence". The Pentagon was also conducting several live-fly hijacking exercises that day, so the sky was full of pilots playing war games. Probably Cheney was orchestrating all of these plus the four planes that were part of the 9-11 "attack". Certainly Cheney, sitting in the Situation Room, was in a position to see the hijackers and intervene, and didn't. So he's either derelict in his duty, or the mastermind. Certainly impeachable, either way.

Donald Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense, was sitting in his office in the Pentagon, on the side away from the "attack", which occurred AFTER both towers were hit. When the Pentagon was struck, he sauntered out, and claimed that he had no idea what was going on! No one called the Secretary of Defense? Especially since on June 1, 2001, just 3 months earlier, he had had the rules about scrambling fighter jets changed, in such a way that no interceptions could take place without HIS PERSONAL APPROVAL! And no one tried to reach him? Or he was unreachable? Either he was derelict or part of the plot. Either way, it's criminal.

All three of these men were responsible for defending the US from enemy attack, and utterly failed to do so. In the Navy, a captain who loses a ship is automatically court-martialled. Shouldn't these three men be subjected to a military tribunal, to account for losing three buildings, 3000 lives, and part of the Pentagon? For their failure to take appropriate countermeasures?

How likely is it that all three of these key people were derelict? Isn't it much more likely that they were conspiring together? Why won't our elected Representatives in Congress IMPEACH THEM?

In the name of the God of truth,

Carol Wolman

yes we can impeach

please see:

Justice deferred is justice denied-MLK

Why won't our elected Representatives in Congress IMPEACH THEM

They are pussies/cowards/immature/scared!

“it is possible to fool all the people all the time—when government and press cooperate.” George Seldes - "legendary investigative reporter"


Bullied, Bought-off and/or Blackmailed

Great blog but.....

I would have to agree with you, but you say that, "were all part of a plot to stage a "false flag" operation, to lay the groundwork for the rest of their evil plans." The assumption here is that the government as a whole is corrupt enough to do such a thing. There are more participants in the government than just Bush, Cheney, and Rumsfeld. I do not believe that all of the individuals involved would go along with a "plot".

For example, the Federal Aviation Admission (FAA) was involved as well. According to an article in the New York Times, the FAA assumed that the transponders on the hijacked airliners would stay on, which would display each plane's identity and altitude. This was not the case. The FAA dropped the ball and did not give enough warning.

The North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) was also involved. NORAD had its radars pointing outward to detect external threats. They did not expect the attack to come internally.

President Bush also reported that the communication links from Air Force One were poor. The four defense jets mistakenly went out to sea instead of going and protecting Washington D.C.

I would agree that the government is incompetent and jumped at the chance to go to war because of this and that there is a conspiracy theory. However, one cannot believe that the government is corrupt enough to plot this plan from the get go and kill 3000 of its own American Citizens.

You broght up very good points though. Good work!

BS Disinfo

You're laughable.

No, it isn't that one must

No, it isn't that one must conclude anything. Right now, there isn't an absolute truth (and there certainly doesn't seem to be any hope for one), so being skeptical is just about the extent to which one may interpret how the administration handled 9/11.

On the other hand, empathizing with a dumbstruck nation, including its government, is another way to look at it. There simply aren't straight enough answers to CONCLUDE on many of the 'hows, buts, and whys'.

Everyone may feel how they choose about 9/11, but accusing the government is not something to take lightly; governments are created and maintained to preserve a people. By dropping the spotlight on the American government's less than triumphant response to the attacks is to accept the fact that as an American citizen, you are being taken advantage of.

If this government killed thousands of its own people, how can you expect impeachment as a form of retaliation? The way you're putting it, there is very little reason to think that impeachment is a possibility at all.

More BS Disinfo

You too.