If I were to tell you that the neoconservatives scheduled the war on terror before 9/11, and that they have now scheduled an obviously politically-driven end date for the war on terror, would that convince you that 9/11 was a hoax?

I mean, after all, if the war on terror was planned before 9/11 and if the so-called "never-ending" or "100 year war" against supposedly widespread and powerful enemies were to be planned to end in a year and a half, wouldn't that provide a big hint that the war on terror isn't what you've been told . . . that you'd been had?

Well, before 9/11, the U.S. planned the wars against Afghanistan and Iraq (and Iran). So the claim by the neocons that they have invaded the middle east in order to get the bad guys who carried out 9/11 just isn't true.

And the U.S. started before 9/11 planning to tap our phone records. So the claim by the government that they only shredded the Bill of Rights and tapped our phones because of the "new reality" created by 9/11 is a false one.

And the number 2 guy at that State Department has strongly hinted that the war of terror will end October 2008 -- the month before the Presidential election. How convenient!

Do you get it now? The whole "war on terror" is a fake, as is the "official" story about what happened on 9/11, the event that was used to justify the public launching of the pre-planned war on terror.

But don't take my word for it. A BBC documentary entitled "The Power of Nightmares", shows that the threat from Al Qaeda has been vastly overblown (and see this article on two of the gentlemen who are behind the hype). And a former National Security Adviser told the Senate that the war on terror is "a mythical historical narrative".

9/11 was just the "New Pearl Harbor" false flag incident which allowed the schedule to be implemented.