Another footage of WTC7 Foreknowledge???

Hello. I am new to this site and I am so glad that I got here.
I have few clips here that I like to share. Although it doesn't have a time stamp on it. But I could confirm it was between 2pm-2:30pm. Because as I fast forward the tape there was a local channel with a time stamp on it and also there was a Guliani press conference with a big clock behind him. Anyway here is the clip.

At 1:37 she interviewed a cop. Listen to what he had to say.

Here another clip of an eyewitness describing the second plane.

I find it very interesting how Brian William commented after the clip. Assuring the audiences "Precisely that was a commercial airliners".

more to come.

Anyone do me a favor?

I'm without sound card again. Can anyone summarize what the officer said at 1:37 of the first clip?

It's hard to hear, but

The cop is saying that he doesn't know much more than she has heard herself, but that they are concerned about a third building, which he tentatively identifies as the AMEX building. She points to 7 and says, the brown building? He says, over on the other side. At the end of the clip, the anchor is discussing the shot showing the AMEX building, clearly identifying it, and saying that is the building the concerns are about. The cop also uses the words "We're worried it's going to fall over and hit the other building."

The reporter makes a couple of references to OTHER bombs, which I thought was interesting.


"We're worried it's going to fall over and hit the other building."

It seems there were a lot of those types of concerns that day.

"So where is the oil going to come from?... The Middle East, with two-thirds of the world's oil and the lowest cost, is still where the prize ultimately lies."

Richard Cheney - Chief Executive Of Halliburton

Interesting Quote Near The Beginning...

Apparently on the south side... about halfway-up it's still burning pretty badly...

Now can anyone remember what is located halfway-up WTC7...

If you cannot remember it's the "OEM Command Bunker" on the 23rd floor.

As a further aside, American Express Bank International occupied floors 7,8 and 13 of WTC7.

Best wishes


This video shows clearly that the massive smoke plumes are from the American Express Building, 3 World Financial, and NOT from building 7, as debunking sites allege.

Someone posted a large photo yesterday which also suggested this, but not as clearly.

The Amex building was the source of the smoke, and not building 7, and we can use this video to prove it.

Can anyone confirm the time of this broadcast?

70 Disturbing Facts About 9/11

John Doraemi publishes Crimes of the State Blog

johndoraemi --at--

Thank you for this very

Thank you for these very important videos.
Regarding videos, how likely is it that there are more people who have video tape of the attacks,but haven't come forward, like "Bob and Bri,What we saw",the ones that waited five years to release their video tape. i bet theres more people like that out there. How can we make them come forward?

Anyone else a little disturbed by these clips

I felt a little sick watching these. I'd never seen this footage before and watching the manipulation as it unfolds is unsettling. The reports and mentions of bombs and explosives are choice, what are the two explosive sounds during the reporters coverage on the "amex" building? Amazing find and I look forward to more.


A lot of people were being told throughout the day that there were problems with building 7.

If you wanna just pan up, I don't know if you can see past me, let me get out of the way. Pan up to that big brown building where you can see most of the smoke. That is 7 world trade center. Apparently on the south side, that's the side that's not facing us, it's uh, about half way up, it's still burning pretty badly because it was rocked with a lot of the explosion from the force of the twin world trade centers, when they came down. A large concern is what's going to happen with that brown building now, which is why we keep getting moved further and further north. You can see people down on the street moving towards us, even media, who were originally allowed more, uh, sort of, free reign to report this story. We're being pushed out as well, because there was some concern that there might be additional explosions, possibly other bombs. There was also some talk about gas, whether that was a gas explosion, a gas bomb, or perhaps just ConED's difficulties in dealing with some of the natural gas here, we're not sure yet.

I don't think this proves foreknowledge of a Controlled Demolition. I just don't think it does. It does, however, mention "explosions", "bombs", etc...

"So where is the oil going to come from?... The Middle East, with two-thirds of the world's oil and the lowest cost, is still where the prize ultimately lies."

Richard Cheney - Chief Executive Of Halliburton

for what it's worth, jon

I agree.

How does one distinguish between eyewitness accounts that anticipate collapse from fire and other damage, and accounts that may intimate foreknowledge of a demolition? (For example, why is it surprising to anyone that people were being pushed away from these buildings? The entire complex was a dangerous place to be.)

We can say, rightly, that most first responders did not believe the buildings would collapse, and we can say there is no precedent for the collapses. But early reports of collapses are too easily dismissed as accidental reporting, or effects of the "fog of war".

For my money, it's best to focus on (as another poster said a couple of days ago) HOW the buildings collapsed as the best evidence for demolition. For that purpose, the mentions of "bombs" in this video are relevant.