A Blast From The Past Reminds Us Why The Official Story Surrouding WTC 7 Is Absurd!
Swingdangler Mon, 03/05/2007 - 1:26pm
''We built in enough redundancy to allow entire portions of floors to be removed without affecting the building's structural integrity, on the assumption that someone might need double-height floors,'' said Larry Silverstein, president of the company. ''Sure enough, Salomon had that need. Source: http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=950DEFDD113BF93AA25751C0A96F948260&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=1
The comment and NY Times article above completely brings into question the fire/gravity reason for the collapse of WTC 7.
- Swingdangler's blog
- Login to post comments
great find
I'll definitely be bringing this up from now on whenever I hear someone talk about the damage to the building.
Fighting for G.O.D. (Gold, Oil, and Drugs) is available now for pre-order on Amazon.
http://www.myspace.com/fightingforgod
I nailed Mr. Worsey on this
who had the guts to claim that WTC7 was so poorly constructed.
http://www.911blogger.com/node/6226
http://www.911blogger.com/node/6226#comment-116756
No answer yet.
Another OCT lies exposed. Reminds me to Lies Lies Lies...it's all lies...