The debate with NIST that never was

Just a reminder that the debate with NIST would have taken place a few days from now; however, NIST "scientists" refused to defend their own work. Instead, NIST engineers choose safe speaking engagements in which they can deny the existence of molten metal at Ground Zero.

http://www.teamliberty.net/id245.html

On January 31, 2007 the Muckraker Report canceled its effort to hold a National 9/11 Debate. We thank everyone who expressed interest in the event, particularly those patriotic Americans that were willing to publicly debate the government officials responsible for the “official” account of what happened on September 11, 2001. Jim Fetzer, George Nelson, Judy Wood, Philip Berg, Steven Jones, Morgan Reynolds, David Ray Griffin, and many others in the “Truth Movement” – the Muckraker Report salutes you and thanks you.

The reason for canceling this effort is simple. After hundreds of letters, e-mails, and phone calls, not one of the 9/11 Commissioners or the government scientists at the National Institute of Standards and Technology have agreed to debate their conclusions. In fact, they all have declined to debate. In addition, the corporate media has refused to report on the debate effort and declined to cover the event.

The good news is that the Muckraker Report no longer believes that a debate is necessary. With more than half the American population now convinced that the government has not been forthcoming about 9/11, what we need now is a special prosecutor, civil litigation, and a criminal investigation. There really isn’t much to debate any longer. This case needs to go to court!

Here Here!

Maybe the government will appropriate a special court to handle this case
___________________
Ignorance is NOT Bliss

Court Case.

"The good news is that the Muckraker Report no longer believes that a debate is necessary. With more than half the American population now convinced that the government has not been forthcoming about 9/11, what we need now is a special prosecutor, civil litigation, and a criminal investigation. There really isn’t much to debate any longer. This case needs to go to court!"

AMEN. AMEN. AMEN!!!!! Let's do it.

Show "I want a debate!" by JamesB

Funny how your heroes at NIST

won't defend their impeccable research. Their silence speaks volumes, Jimmy.

Or maybe we shouldn't say "the debate did not occur"? Maybe we should say, in honor of the decisive conclusions of the FEMA and NIST studies, "The debate has a low probability of occurrence."

Sad

I was looking forward to hearing their 9/11 tour guide expert........Yup! Mark Roberts
I would have thought the 9/11 experts from Unpopular Mechanic's would have jumped at the chance.
I still would like them to answer this question.
If the massive squibs on WTC1 & WTC#2 were from compression of the upper floors,then on WTC#7 with the squibs going from bottom to top would you say that was reversed compression?

As not even NIST endorses the pancake theory anymore

those squibs seen out of the TT lack any explanation on part of the official story. Back to sheer handwaving.

"Jim Fetzer, George Nelson,

"Jim Fetzer, George Nelson, Judy Wood, Philip Berg, Steven Jones, Morgan Reynolds, David Ray Griffin, and many others in the “Truth Movement” – the Muckraker Report salutes you and thanks you."

Well perhaps having people who say "Space Beams" knocked down the Towers, and that "no planes even hit the buildings" and it was all "CGI" or "Holograms" or both, is what allows the fraud makers at NIST to say "we don't want to dignify crazy conspiracy theories".

true

But the other way of looking at that is to say, If the competing theories were so insane, it should have been easy to destroy them in a debate.

No they don't compete dude,

No they don't compete dude, those "theories" are so ridiculous that they destroy themselves. But it's not about proving them wrong, it only takes devoting some commonsense for just the briefest of moments before that disinfo gets debunked, disinfo is set up to be easily taken down, it's got no other purpose. It's about a) making us look stupid, b) dividing us and c) wasting our time and energy. Paying attention to it or even "debating" it is just what these f*cking scumbags want, so we shouldn’t give it to them. Instead these disinfo pushing assclowns need to be denounced and rejected as often as possible in my opinion.

Thank you for posting this, simuvac

I agree that if a theory is insane, it should be easy to destroy in debate.

I want a debate too.

But the _last_ thing we need is Judy Wood debating the government.
.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-558096240694803017&q=judy+wood+...

Seen it

I once saw a ventrilliguist debating his puppet... it was sad

I could totally see his lips moving.... was not distracted by the puppets googly eyes or gaping jaw
___________________
Ignorance is NOT Bliss