Alex Jones blows the lid off of 9/11 once again!

Boeing remote control hardware installed in planes as far back as the year 2000.

Field McConnel and David Hawkins are just what this movement needs! Please read their story at, and you must listen to the rebroadcast of today's (Wed. Mar 07 2007) Alex Jones' GCN radio show (if you havent already)

go to this link:

Choose one of the REBROADCAST links from the black banner. The show airs live from 12 Noon - 3pm (EST - NYC) and then rebroadcasts on those links until the next live show 21 hours later. No matter where you are you can stream the full show from start to finish, just adjust for your local time.

Everyone needs to hear this show and post what they think!

(As I post this the live show is 20 mins from ending)


I don't know anything about McConnel.

However, Hawkins has consistently made bizarre claims, like the "teacher's union" did 9/11 and the Canadians did 9/11 (Hawkins claims that the Canadian branch of Norad and some Canadian high-tech company did it).

Anyone who has been on a message board or mailing list with Hawkins knows that he is unbelievably disruptive, and that his claims are really out there.


I don't know Hawkins' history but he sounded pretty credible to me. McConnel is a Northwest Airlines pilot and former military pilot who has retired early and is in the process of suing Boeing. We should all flesh out this story.

Physics/Science/Mathematics do not lie, only people do.
9/11 was an INSIDE JOB

Remote Control

We already know that the technology was available..... it really didn't have to be installed on every aircraft to be a feasable scenario.

These planes flew over several military installation on their way to target.

Planes do not fly through restricted military airspace.... especially with their transponders shut off.
Together in Truth!

Yes, in addition to the "near collision"...

...over Stewart Air Base in NY, flights 11, 175, and 93 seemed to make major changes of direction over airports, as I recall. As we all know, 77's flight path is a lot more dodgy....

I've always felt this was an underinvestigated aspect of 9/11, especially in light of Operation Northwoods.


knowing technology exists now is one thing, it being in operation as far back as 2000 and eluding to having proof of this is quite another. McConnel has taken early retirement, went public, and is suing Boeing over this issue. Not to mention Boeing VP spoke about explosives in commercial plane doors publically on record. And now Boeing is announcing anti-hijack technology for commercial aircraft.

The details are a mess, I urge everyone to listen to the rebroadcast.

Physics/Science/Mathematics do not lie, only people do.
9/11 was an INSIDE JOB

The Alex Jones Show ,can

The Alex Jones Show ,can also be heard at ,click "listen live" -just in case...

Yesterday, Tuesday the 6th, Alex Jones asked viewers to go find a video clip where George Bush should have said something about remote control aircraft. Was Alex mistaken, or am I wrong that it was some kind of US military person who talked about that on open camera?

about the title

I just wanna comment on the title. To say "blow the lid off" implies that the story is all over the place; as famous as Michael Jackson's nose. It would probably be beneficial to save these kinds of expressions for when the lid REALLY IS blown off, in other words, when critical mass is reached. When my aunts, uncles, and nextdoor neighbors come to me telling me about 9/11 being an inside job, then I'll know the lid's been blown. Until then, let's choose our phrases more wisely. Just my 2 or 3 cents.

Point taken

Just thought this was quite important. Oh well.
Physics/Science/Mathematics do not lie, only people do.
9/11 was an INSIDE JOB

I'm unconvinced

I didn't listen to the broadcast... but from the story I gathered that some Boeing exec stated: "every single door on an airplane has actuators that are triggered by explosives".

Paul Joseph Watson then immediately hypothesizes "Was this a slip of the tongue? Is Bain telling us that all airliners are rigged with explosives that can be remotely detonated?"

I would argue that no, he probably is not. Maybe the explosives just help open those heavy-ass doors midflight? That would make it quick and easy to open by a weak person.

We have enough 9/11 facts... this makes us look like total paranoids.


Doors blow open in midflight.... you are going to have problems
Together in Truth!

If you ever need to open them at all...

you definitely have problems.

Still, automobile airbags use explosive actuators.

The fact that airplane doors use them doesn't seem significant. I sure don't think it implies that airliners are detonated to explode.

New information?

Perhaps I'm missing something, but all claims made by McConnel are based on year-old open source documentation. I covered this story on my blog in April of 2006. link

What's new here?

I forwarded this information to Alex nearly a year ago and he didn't find it important enough to follow up on.


I am convinced that remote

I am convinced that remote control was utilized during the attacks but this guy sounds like a quack. Canadian teacher's union!!??

The Eleventh Day of Every Month

QRS-11 legit, but NO SOURCES PROVIDED by McConnell

The "featured items" at read like pulp fiction. While plenty of documentation exists on the QRS-11 Gyrochip, he fails to reference any of these sources.

See: Google search for QRS at

The absence of this easily available documentation does a disservice to the QRS-11 Gyroscope issue, giving the casual reader a sense that McConnell's story is completely fabricated.

When asked by Alex Jones for sources, McConnell stated that he learned everything from reading


The explosive bolts is a bullshit story

The explosive bolts to open the doors are not some evil terror plan. It's a standard feature of the doors. If there's a crash and the mechanism is stuck, they would be a welcome thing to have.

Claiming that this blows the lid off 9/11!!!!!!!!!! is silly, and damages credibility. It had nothing to do with the attacks of that day at all.

I haven't gotten to the part about the remote controlling.

70 Disturbing Facts About 9/11

John Doraemi publishes Crimes of the State Blog

johndoraemi --at--


They did focus on the explosives a bit too much.... I hope Alex isn't letting his comfortability affect him a bit too much.

Please don't become a Noam!

There was alot said by his guest..... he did make a very good point about the plane not possibly making those types of manouvers prior to allegidly striking the Pentagon.... he also mentioned in the same breath that the strike was on the very important Naval Intelligence.

This type of gyro chip would be essential in whatever struck the Pentagon!!! making those types of high speed turns and altitude changes with such precision
Together in Truth!