Air America ad runs this Thursday FYI, anyone able to record it for us?

Show up this Saturday if you're in the area:

http://9-11.meetup.com/282/calendar/5485098/

St. Joseph County Public Library
Colfax Auditorium, 304 S. Main Street
South Bend, IN 46601

March 17th, @ 10am

This will be an historic event, featuring three prominent members of the 9/11 Truth Movement: Mike Berger, Kevin Ryan, and Webster Tarpley. All three will give individual presentations, and there will also be a showing of Mike Berger's recent film, Improbable Collapse.

Don't miss this amazing opportunity to hear about 9/11 truth first hand, from these remarkable gentlemen.

We're also going to raffle off some free 9/11 truth books and DVDs and provide information on the South Bend 9/11 Questions Meetup Group and its upcoming events.

Everyone please watch this documentary, “Man-made Global Warming” is yet another giant public manipulation and I can’t believe some guys here still aren’t clued up to it;

http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=9005566792811497638

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TX4RonPaul/

www.northtexansfor911truth.com

Don’t forget to vote for Ron Paul in these polls:

http://newsmanager.commpartners.com/uscc/issues/2007-03-09/index.html

http://www.wrko.com//Article.asp?id=347331

http://cycloneconservatives.blogspot.com/2007/02/ron-paul-libertarian-or...

www.northtexansfor911truth.com

I was just reading this interview with Karen Kwiatkowski, Pentagon whistleblower, and I thought her comments were germane to two ongoing 9/11 Truth debates: 1) that a conspiracy of a small group in the Pentagon would not entail the explicit complicity of hundreds or thousands of others; and 2) that the neocons had "an agenda" that was very pro-Israel, and saw America as a "benevolent dictator".

"I think march 23 is when we actually conducted that attack on Baghdad and that kind of thing. Most people in the Pentagon, there’s 23,000 people work in the Pentagon. Most of those people were as in the dark as any of the Americans. They believed what they read in the papers, and what they read in the papers, particularly The New York Times and The Washington Post had been, for the most part, planted by The Administration. We know this now, the whole Congress knows this now, they’ve had a number of hearings publicly faltered, I think even the DODIG [Department of Defense Inspector General] just recently faltered, Doug Feith and his whole organization for planting and providing misleading stories, many of which were later leaked on purpose to the press. A friendly press, of course, Judith Miller was not hostile to the intentions of this administration. They wanted to go into Iraq, and they intended to go into Iraq. We did go into Iraq, and all that was really needed was to bring onboard the American people, and to bring onboard the Congress. But not necessarily to declare war. Congress has never been asked to declare war on Iraq. And they won’t be asked to declare war on Iran even though we will conduct that war. These guys had an agenda. In fact, one of the things that I did learn as a result of having my eyes opened in that final tour in the Pentagon is that neo-conservatives, their foreign policy is very activist, you could say that’s a nice way to say it, very activist, it’s very oriented towards the Untied States as a benevolent dictator, a benevolent guiding hand for the world, particularly the Middle East. And it’s very much a pro-Israel policy, and it’s a policy that says, we should be able to do whatever we want to do, if we see it in our interest."

Gentlemen, 9/11 Researchers, all;

I'm serious. Why is it that no one over 40 seems to be stuying the actual facts behind the construction documentation of WTC 1, 2 and 7?

Prove me wrong Frank Demartini, prove me wrong Leslie Robertson, prove me wrong Alex Jones, you are all missing the fact BECAUSE it is clearly hidden in plain sight. Mind you, I’m just a photographer, but I do know how to judge the relative strength of any two adjoined materials, in a wide range of construction applications. Materials I have felt in my own hands, which none of you can claim to have done!

Here is the hyperbole, and your self-fulfilling conundrum:

  Newly Unearthed Footage Exposes 9/11 Media Scripting
Bizarre foreknowledge and explanation of towers' collapse more cryptic clairvoyance

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Monday, March 12, 2007

"Sections of the other tower are also crumbling - no the reason this is happening, according to the website for the World Trade Center, they're actually telling us that the structure, the outside cladding of this building is integral to the safety and security of it," states the news anchor following the collapse of the south tower. "Once you penetrate that,- apparently the very structure of the building is under threat and that's why one tower has already collapsed."

"The suspicious rapidity of the instant press release [PROOF OF INDEPENDENT SOURCING, NOT ‘PROPER’ -SCRIPTING] aside, why did the World Trade Center's website carry such a blatantly fallacious explanation for the collapse of the first tower? Even the layman knows that any modern building is anchored by core columns, not "outside cladding," and the twin towers were no different. "

* Watson errs here with his assertive use of the word: ‘Anchored.’ This opinion is patently false, according to numerous pre-construction industry magazine,articles; ie.: A.Record, 1971-1984. "Elasticity" at the perimiter columns IS CENTRAL to THIS design's integrity!, NOT Contiguous vertical symmetry. One 'hole' makes no difference, according to the prior '727-impact figures.'

"To rest a building's integrity on its "outside cladding" is a reversal of all commonly accepted architectural knowledge. Why was the World Trade Center website peddling this nonsense in contradiction with the words of the twin tower's own designers?"

* Which ‘Designers?’ Had you spoken to Minuoru Yamasaki?

"Included in over a dozen examples compiled here, Frank A. Demartini, on-site construction manager for the World Trade Center, said that the towers could sustain "multiple impacts of jetliners" without collapsing."

* UTTERLY IRRELEVANT.

"In addition, Leslie Robertson, one of the two original structural engineers for the World Trade Center, stated that, “The twin towers were in fact the first structures outside the military and nuclear industries designed to resist the impact of a jet airplane.”

* Again, NOT RELEVANT, but here's the punch-line:

"The twin towers were desgined to absorb airliner impacts by means of their 47 huge core columns."

* Again, ABSOLUTELY FALSE. The transferrence of --horizontal--pressures rests first in the ability of the (22’? 1/2 truss-sectional) to sustain an end-impact, meaning almost all of the energy is lost before you get to these cores. You haven’t yet illustrated a ‘model’ of the plane’s penteration, which Leslie's original data clearly IS REFERRING TO!

"The twin towers could not be compromised simply by damaging their "outside cladding," such a claim is patently absurd and why it was immediately peddled as an explanation for their collapse is highly suspect."

* False. Charges placed WITHIN the cavitiy between the steel and the aluminum DID force the external columns to de-couple, and release from the decking as it fell.

"Later in the clip, the anchor comments, "It is completely enveloped in smoke, it is on fire, and we understand that this other tower is also in a situation of near collapse." "

"Based on the testimony of the [TWO ASSIGNED] experts who designed and built the twin towers, how on earth could officials and the media be so sure that the towers were going to collapse unless they were being fed a script by individuals who knew they were about to be imploded and were carefully preparing the cover story?"

* Ah, ha! ABSOLUTELY TRUE!

Now we are ready to connect the dots. Not all of the information streaming forth to the Media was being censored as it came into these announcer’s view, but as the day wore on, we know the NSA, et al., ‘managed the story’ precisely as it needed to read for those who actually were on the inside team. Obviously we understand the functional nature of a multi-tiered team effort. (I was personally in group #1.) Once the job was complete, nobody in the lesser, equally ‘guilty’ teams would come forward to rat-out the higher-ups, ie: Rumsfeld & Cheney.

.... Kids, we're right back to addressing the cladding, and the daming, physical model mock-up I witnessed in Emery Roth’s Office, which absolutely brings all of this to a ‘case-closed’ condition, -once you put Robertson, Skillings, Roth, et. al under oath!

-Tom-Scott Gordon, WTC Photographer, ”The Bridgeways Project.” -Terminated by "FBI," 1987.

im not gay myself but i am a human being so these poll results disgust me:

Top General Calls Homosexuality 'Immoral'
Gay Advocacy Group Blasts Comment as 'Outrageous'
AP
How do you feel about Pace's comments?
Agree 56%
Disagree 41%
Not sure 3%
Total Votes: 22,941
Note on Poll Results
http://news.aol.com/topnews/articles/_a/top-general-calls-homosexuality-...

After Rosie came out and advoacted for a new investigation, here comes the special agent danny bonaduce on cnn, telling everybody how dumb she is. maybe it is just a coincidence, yea right. Maybe Danny can come clean and let everyone know where he got his material from?

Has anyone had any luck logging into cooperative research this morning?

Basically, the stated objective by the original authors of the federal reserve was a smoke screen behind which was their real objective - to maintain a monopoly on money and credit by the big New York Banks.

Edward Griffin:
http://www.bigeye.com/griffin.htm

1. The Federal Reserve is incapable of accomplishing its stated objectives.
2. It is a cartel operating against the public interest.
3. It's the supreme instrument of usury.
4. It generates our most unfair tax.
5. It encourages war.
6. It destabilizes the economy.

Dying Woman Loses Marijuana Appeal
By DAVID KRAVETS
AP
SAN FRANCISCO (March 14) - A federal appeals court ruled Wednesday that a California woman whose doctor says marijuana is the only medicine keeping her alive is not immune from federal prosecution on drug charges.
Are you sympathetic with the plaintiff in this case?
Yes 91%
No 9%
Total Votes: 13,596
Note on Poll Results
http://news.aol.com/topnews/articles/_a/dying-woman-loses-marijuana-appe...