North American Union the catalyst for the next 9/11?

Robert Pastor, a leading intellectual force in the move to create an EU-style North American Community, told WND he believes a new 9/11 crisis could be the catalyst to merge the U.S., Mexico and Canada.

Pastor, a professor at American University, says that in such a case the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America, or SPP – launched in 2005 by the heads of the three countries at a summit in Waco, Texas – could be developed into a continental union, complete with a new currency, the amero, that would replace the U.S. dollar just as the euro has replaced the national currencies of Europe.

In May 2005, Pastor was co-chairman the Council on Foreign Relations task force that produced a report entitled "Toward a North American Community," which he has claimed is the blueprint behind the SSP declared by President Bush, Mexico's then-President Vicente Fox, and Canada's then-Prime Minister Paul Martin.

(Read all about it here; reprinted from PrisonPlanet) (PP link now goes to blank page)

There are, as you can see at that first link, mounds of articles about the North American Union process which is under way now. I think Pastor's suggestion should not be taken lightly; while he is one man and not a consortium a la PNAC, he by no means stands alone in these matters. I compare his comments about this to Brzezinski's February comments about a possible near-future terror pretext for invading Iran.

Suggested topic for discussion: NAU propulsion vs. invasion of Iran as competing motivations for the next 9/11 (or, if you prefer, Pearl Harbor III). Maybe both? It is widely believed, now, that 9/11 was motivated by a combination of interests, as many also believe was the case with the conspirators who killed JFK.

Very probable

good post.....

Perhaps when educating people about 9/11, we should tell them of these predictions, so that when/if it happens, the light will go on for people....and we'll real numbers in the streets...

Multiple outcomes....

Thanks for this posting. I'm very concerned that the next false-flag event will catch even the 9/11 truth community off guard and set us back quite a ways. Why? Because the perpetrators will probably make the next one much bigger and with many more casualties and even more confusion than 9/11 had. When that happens, logic and reason go out the window and lots of ridiculous new laws will go into affect. My biggest fear is that the internet will be clamped down on in some manner so as to end the last channel of free speech left.

And, yes, the next false-flag event will likely serve multiple purposes -- Iran invasion AND North American Union AND clampdown on civil liberties and the internet.

That's why I'm in agreement with the Green Party candidate Craig Hill from Vermont who believes that impeachment is necessary even moreso than a new 9/11 investigation which could drag on too long before more damage is done.

mm hmm

It's a race, and we don't know when it's going to be ended.

Didn't this used to be a pretty cool country? I sure liked it when I was a kid. :-/

Well... keep on doing whatever you can. Work, pray, talk, think, read, and then do it all again... what's the alternative? Surrender is unthinkable.

Want to figure out 9/11? Ponder the 9/11 "Mineta Stone"

excellent timeline of NAU development

If anyone wants to get up to speed on the history of this thing, there is a stunningly well-done timeline available here (pages 5-15). Highly recommended.

Want to figure out 9/11? Ponder the 9/11 "Mineta Stone"