Hasboro Reports 911 Truth Surge

I received this video in an email on Thursday. I watched it and I realized I already knew the Truth about 911 but I couldn't admit it. The video was inspiring.

Whoever voted 1 for this movie

is either a total moron or a shill. This movie may not be blockbuster level but it was someone trying to spread the word.

The person who voted this a 1 should take a good look in the mirror. I voted a 10 just to counteract your 1. I would have normally gave this an 7 or 8.

very Kubrickian


and well

hey hasboro, I'm flattered you posted it. I like the video and I like your attitude.

seen it before

excellent short subject on wtc7 IMO! :)


Real Truther a.k.a. Verdadero Verdadero

WTCdemolition.com - Harvard Task Force


I always kinda liked this video

"There are none so hoplessly enslaved as those who falsely believe they are free" (Goethe)..... a paraphrase from V: Cast aside the illusions. Only when you are finally hopeless can you truly be free.

I'd like to point out...

...one wtc7 collapse observation, and I would like people's opinions on this:

Many times people have pointed out that there can be seen "squibs" travelling up the right side of the building (dark spots) just as it begins collapsing. For a long while I assumed thats what we were seeing, but now I think its a mistake. Let me say for the record I am a 9/11 truther, 9/11 was an inside job, all three wtc buildings were brought down using various forms of controlled demolition. Having said that, I think what we are seeing in the wtc7 collapse films, with regard to squibs along the right side (as hilited in this film) are actually a column of windows (spanning a several floors) whose facing angle has changed slightly due to deformation of the wall face as the building is about to collapse. These windows change their angle ever so slightly and go from a reflective "glare" state, to a shadow state as the building begins to move. If these dark spots were jets of smoke eminating from the building just before it collapses, then once the building began moving downward the dark spots should remain in place (outside of the building) and a smoke trail should be formed as the building falls - this does not occur. Further, one or two of the "dark spots" turn on and off across frames of the film.

If anyone would like to discuss this please post. I am only referring to the dark spots assumed to squidbs appearing on the upper right-most part of the building during the collapse start.

Physics/Science/Mathematics do not lie, only people do.
9/11 was an INSIDE JOB

Hey Cowboy

Sorry to spoil it for you, but your "it's just reflections" notion doesn't work. The squibs move from bottom to top. If they were reflections they would match the collapsing direction of the building, top to bottom.

Squibs move from bottom to top, just like in so many controlled demolitions.

you're not listening

if they were puffs of smoke why do they not stay in their horizontal positions and produce a smoke wisp as the building falls away? Also watch how the dark spots travel down WITH the building as some "turn off and on" as the building moves.

I don't know why you feel the need to be short and hostile with me, I want to get at the truth as much as you do, but I don't want to do it thru evidence that is easily debunked. You'd much rather have me raise this question as opposed to some douche bag debunk attempt. There is clearly a ton of evidence supporting WTC7 was a controlled demolition, these "squibs" dont make or break the argument - I am simply pointing out some physical impossibility with them being squibs. I also dont claim I am right, I am just questioning it. Isnt that what this is all about? Asking questions, demanding answers, using physical laws to demonstrate what is and what isn't possible??

Think clearly and critically, not inside a box. I am under the impression that these are not squibs. Anyone care to explain how they are squibs?

Physics/Science/Mathematics do not lie, only people do.
9/11 was an INSIDE JOB

Yeah, that's a tough one.

It's hard to take a clear look at it. There's a lot of smoke in the background, so that does something to obsturct any new "puffs". If there are jets of debri, could it be possible that they get lost in the pre-existing smoke clouds behind them? The close up is a bit grainy, and doesn't last long enough to take a good look. There is no doubt, whether they are glares or puffs, that they travel upwards, and there are definately streams of smoke comming off the forward facing wall. I don't know...good point though.
This is a very effective video on building 7; probably one of the best I've seen. Short and to the point, with a healthy dose of humor. If I could make one suggestion to its creator, it would be to show the pictures of the side with gashes in it. It hurts the argument when you don't show that side. Makes it seem like you're hiding something, or avoiding that issue altogether. Perhaps mention the fact that other buildings had debri fall on them, wouldn't account for straight down, free fall speed, etc etc. I dunno...maybe a cartoon of a guy chopping the base of a tree at an angle, running out of the way, yelling "timber!" and having the tree fall straight down in on itself :). It was soooo close to being the "perfect" bldg 7 vid. I like the satirical approach to it. Sometimes when dealing with a topic as intimidating/horrific as 9/11, it's the best way to approach it.

Yes, I agree...

...whatever we are seeing here with regards to the black spots that appear on the upper right portion of wtc7 as it begins to collapse definitely travel upwards, thus why everyone (myself included) sees "squibs", because of the upwards travel. The problem begins after these "spots" appear. The building begins to move downward, and the "spots" go along for the ride without any smoke wisp or trail. If you watch that bit frame by frame youll also note a couple of the spots disappear in place, which cant be possible if it is smoke/squib/puffs etc. One explanation could be: as the internals of the building (the steel frame) is undermined, and begins to fall internally, just before any external downward travel begins, the walls could be forming a slight concavity from their centers towards the edges (ie: corners of the building). Any slight angle change of the glass panes due to the wall deforming across the whole of its face is enough to change the angle of the sheets of glass to the camera. This change in angle is enough to produce the dramatic white-to-black effect we see in the footage. Further, if this is not smoke or visible squibs, and is indeed the glass angles being altered, it is still a huge find because regardless of what it is (glass or smoke) the wave does travel upwards, the same direction the cutter charges would fire, and the same direction the wall would change its shape, from smooth/flat to concave, in the split second before the collapse begins.

I actually noticed the odditiy in this footage a while ago (like 6 months or more) but sort of forgot about it (which is easy to do in this unending mountain of 9/11 evidence). I only remembered this when I saw this video which points it out at around the 5 minute mark. I did originally think it was squibs, but now I lean to it not being such.

We know 9/11 was an inside job, I just dont think these are squibs.

Physics/Science/Mathematics do not lie, only people do.
9/11 was an INSIDE JOB