Rosie: Was 9/11 inside job to protect Enron?

Digg this story here.
Vote on Netscape here.

Blog suggests destruction of federal investigations factor in terror attacks

Was the World Trade Center brought down deliberately on Sept. 11, 2001, for the purpose of – are you ready for this? – eliminating records of government investigations into corporate fraud? That's the implication of a blog posting by Rosie O'Donnell about the worst terror attack in American history.

In her March 15 posting, titled "wtc7," on her blog, the controversial TV personality and co-host of ABC's popular "The View" morning show, starts off by recounting popular conspiracy "factoids" regarding the World Trade Center's Building No. 7, which collapsed after the two larger "twin towers" fell.

O'Donnell writes:

* The fires in WTC 7 were not evenly distributed, so a perfect collapse was impossible.

* Silverstein said to the fire department commander "the smartest thing to do is pull it."

* Firefighters withdrawing from the area stated the building was going to "blow up."

* The roof of WTC 7 visibly crumbled and the building collapsed perfectly into its footprint.

* Molten steel and partially evaporated steel members were found in the debris.

Like O'Donnell, 9/11 skeptics frequently cite World Trade Center 7 as proof that controlled demolition was responsible for all three buildings' collapse, since WTC7, although ravaged by fire, was not hit by airplanes as the other two towers were. However, Popular Mechanics wrote in its March 2005 cover story, "Debunking The 9/11 Myths": "The collapse of both World Trade Center towers – and the smaller WTC 7 a few hours later – initially surprised even some experts. But subsequent studies have shown that the WTC's structural integrity was destroyed by intense fire as well as the severe damage inflicted by the planes. That explanation hasn't swayed conspiracy theorists, who contend that all three buildings were wired with explosives in advance and razed in a series of controlled demolitions."

The remainder of O'Donnell's blog entry on 9/11 consists of a listing of various records supposedly destroyed in the collapse of WTC7, apparently meant to imply the building was brought down so as to eliminate records of investigations of Enron and other companies. Citing various sources at the end of each paragraph, O'Donnell writes:

[WTC 7] contained offices of the FBI, Department of Defense, IRS (which contained prodigious amounts of corporate tax fraud, including Enron’s), US Secret Service, Securities & Exchange Commission (with more stock fraud records), and Citibank’s Salomon Smith Barney, the Mayor’s Office of Emergency Management and many other financial institutions. [Online Journal]

The SEC has not quantified the number of active cases in which substantial files were destroyed [by the collapse of WTC 7]. Reuters news service and the Los Angeles Times published reports estimating them at 3,000 to 4,000. They include the agency’s major inquiry into the manner in which investment banks divvied up hot shares of initial public offerings during the high-tech boom. … "Ongoing investigations at the New York SEC will be dramatically affected because so much of their work is paper-intensive," said Max Berger of New York's Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann. "This is a disaster for these cases." [New York Lawyer]

Citigroup says some information that the committee is seeking [about WorldCom] was destroyed in the Sept. 11 terror attack on the World Trade Center. Salomon had offices in 7 World Trade Center, one of the buildings that collapsed in the aftermath of the attack. The bank says that back-up tapes of corporate emails from September 1998 through December 2000 were stored at the building and destroyed in the attack. [TheStreet]

Inside [WTC 7 was] the US Secret Service’s largest field office with more than 200 employees. … "All the evidence that we stored at 7 World Trade, in all our cases, went down with the building," according to US Secret Service Special Agent David Curran. [TechTV]

O'Donnell's views on the 9/11 terror attacks are understandable in light of her defense, last week, of 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed. During the March 15 broadcast of ABC's "The View," which she co-hosts, O'Donnell defended the terror kingpin, suggesting the U.S. government elicited a false confession from Mohammed by using torture, robbing him of his humanity and treating him like an animal.

A transcript of Mohammed's confession to 31 terrorist attacks had been released that day, but O'Donnell argued it came only after having a "hood on his head and being beaten to death."

The hood was a reference to the Abu Ghraib prison scandal in Iraq in which U.S. military personnel were punished for humiliating prisoners.

O'Donnell echoed the sentiments of Palestinian terrorist Abu Jihad, who told WND today, "I am sure the Americans tortured Mohammad and forced him to say these untrue things. Isn't it strange it took three years since his arrest for the supposed confession?"

Pointing out Mohammed was arrested in March 2003, O'Donnell asked, "Why hasn't he admitted it until now?" according to clips posted on the weblog

"They didn't allow reporters there and he hasn't had a lawyer," the talk show host stated, insinuating the confession was coerced with no accountability.

Defending U.S. handling of Mohammed, co-panelist Elisabeth Hasselbeck asked, "You don't think he had ties to any of (the terrorist acts)?"

"I think the man has been under custody in secret CIA torture prisons and Guantanamo Bay where torture is accepted and allowed – and he finally is the guy who admits to doing everything," O'Donnell said. "They finally found the guy, it's not that guy bin Laden, it's this guy they've had since March 2003."

O'Donnell added: "And look, this is the picture they release of him. Doesn't he look healthy?"

The photo of an unkempt Mohammed, however, was taken upon his arrest four years ago.

O'Donnell then argued terrorists are people too, and asserted the U.S. "robs them of their humanity."

"They've been treating them like animals … they have hoods over their heads, they torture them on a daily basis," she said.

Suggesting the U.S. is looking for a scapegoat, O'Donnell said of Mohammed, "for whatever he did or didn't do, he is not the be all, end all of terrorism in America. And our government has not found the answer in this one man."

Mohammad confessed in a U.S. military tribunal to plots that included a previously undisclosed plan to kill several former U.S. presidents, including Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton.

"I was responsible for the 9/11 operation from A to Z," Mohammed said in a statement read during a hearing on his status at the U.S. detention facility at Guantanamo.

He confessed to the murder of journalist Daniel Pearl, saying, "I decapitated with my blessed right hand the head of the American Jew, Daniel Pearl, in the city of Karachi, Pakistan."

Mohammed added: "For those who would like to confirm, there are pictures of me on the Internet holding his head."

In November, O'Donnell told Hasselbeck in an exchange on "The View" that Americans shouldn't fear terrorists.

"Faith or fear, that's your choice," she said.

"You can walk through life believing in the goodness of the world, or walk through life afraid of anyone who thinks different than you and trying to convert them to your way of thinking."

I think she's done a great job.

I never really cared one way or another about her but now I'm becoming a fan. What she has done is huge. Even if you don't really like her or watch her. All the garbage with Trump and now after this, complete silence from the msm.....? Everybody needs to email her their supporting words. What is taking so long for some of these celebs to just ask some questions?


This story can be found in the "Political Opinion"

Vote it up on NETSCAPE, They dont bury stories:

Please Add Digg button at top, Thanks


Reading through this, and not seeing any mention of Dr. Griffin's upcoming book, "Debunking The Debunkers", my earlier article entitled, "Popular Mechanics Debunked", or Dr. Griffin's chapter entitled, "Possible Motives Of The Bush Administration", and instead saw arguments indicating that Rosie O'Donnell is a "Terrorist Sympathizer", I had a real warm feeling in my heart.


"So where is the oil going to come from?... The Middle East, with two-thirds of the world's oil and the lowest cost, is still where the prize ultimately lies."

Richard Cheney - Chief Executive Of Halliburton

U should write comedy

"I had a real warm feeling in my heart."

Good one JG.

Speaking of hearts .
Wonder IF the easter bunny will bring new goodies for Halliburtons chief exec ?
OOPS ! forgot he is now VP and broke all his contacts with Hal so there is no professional conflict of interest.

IF you believe in that sorta of thing..

you know the easter bunny?

hippie hop hop


WND is one scary site...goddess coultergeist is a star there.

WHY would Rosie rock the boat ??she is an elite..she gots lots of cash and starpower then again losing her adoring fans to the future death camps of hallbutton may be a bit disturbing???

The patterns seem to be almost every wk some event /person shows up to add to the resume of Bush Cheny dynamic duo
extortion friendly and treason club co-managers

She does have HUGE fan base and who knows MAYBE a few more sleepers will shut off reality TV and get real about the fascist occupation of the USA.

Treason is in the season of the Bush..been a very long 6+yrs

"O'Donnell writes:
WTC 7] contained offices of the FBI, Department of Defense, IRS (which contained prodigious amounts of corporate tax fraud, including Enron’s), US Secret Service, Securities & Exchange Commission (with more stock fraud records), and Citibank’s Salomon Smith Barney, the Mayor’s Office of Emergency Management and many other financial institutions. [Online Journal] "

for some unknown reason my

for some unknown reason my most recent Rosie blog posting has been pulled down. DZ, would you mind giving an explanation? im just a little confused


here is what she most recently said -

Dawn writes:

Ro, it is time.

You must realize you need to give up The View and its censorship.

Your fans are begging you - please get your own show - on CABLE!!

We want to hear your full voice

Rosie: this is as much of my voice
as i want to use

well unfortunately looks like we're going to have to squeeze it out of her she is not going to voluntarily mention it on the View.

Yes, Rosie could just ignore 9/11 truth and go on leading an

extremely comfortable life for herself--but she has chosen not to!!!

Rosie is obviously a very righteous person with great conscience & caring! She is helping restore my faith in humanity--after most of it was destroyed when I accepted the painful truth that 9/11 was clearly an inside job.

We should be forever grateful to Rosie & the other brave people like her!

E mail Rosie and ask her to

E mail Rosie and ask her to ask NIST

( Its been 5 1/2 years since the destruction of WTC7 we have fought two wars and hundred of thousands of innocent people had died for this God forsaken war and you still haven't figured out why WTC7 collapsed .)

Rosie's email address?

I wasn't able to find it.

This is now the third blog on which I'm asking this. :-)

why rosie might "rock the boat"

This is just speculation, but one reason Rosie might feel compelled to speak out is because the people behind this coup d'etat are promoting theocratic fascism as a means of consolidating power, and gay women don't tend to do very well under theocratic fascism.

Hell, women don't do very well under theocratic fascism.

yeah but the thing is, she

yeah but the thing is, she should have LESS incentive to do that now because the Dems took over Congress and the next president most likely will be a Dem who supports her side of the gay issue (Clinton, Edwards, or Obama) or a GOP who isn't a theocrat (Giuliani, Romney). All she had to do was chill out for a while and she knew things would be better for her community than it has been the last 6 years. Now she is taking the risk of giving up her very visible platform to help her community by taking on this issue for which she'll probaby be kicked off TV.

I don't believe the Dems really "took over" Congress

and I think the powers that are currently in play supersede the ability of Congress to do much about the situation. I'm not talking about secret societies; I'm simply referring to cultural realities such as the consolidation of media ownership, corporate stranglehold on the democratic process, and the increasingly polarized public space.

I think celebrities are beginning to awaken to the new reality of American politics and its increasingly fascistic appearance. A slight change in the balance of visible power (Congress) won't change the radical change in the balance of invisible power that has been creeping silently for over 40 years, beginning with the assassination of JFK.

I could be wrong. I certainly hope the Democrats manage to reverse the authoritarian slide currently underway. But they feed from the same trough as the Republicans, and I suspect whatever changes they bring will be mostly cosmetic.

Let Sibel Edmonds testify. Remove the gag. Let's expose this bullshit charade for what it is.

Her Fan Base is Different

It seems like Rosie has the capability to reach an entirely different audience than a run of the mill celebrity.

I'm not sure what her biggest segment is, but like housewives?

Rosie O'Donnell Joins 9/11 Conspiracy Crowd

Check out this article from The National Ledger (AZ) Yes, Rosie is gathering adoring fans and some expected heat:

Rosie O'Donnell Joins 9/11 Conspiracy Crowd
By Nancy Streets
Mar 19, 2007
"Depending on one's point of view, Rosie O'Donnell is either a silly comedian that uses humor and takes shots at politicians and celebrities for ratings or a shrill pundit that tries to cash in on others popularity to advance her agenda. I usually fall in the latter category, but her recent political commentary has revealed that she is quite short when it comes to the lessons of civics and the workings of the United States government....

At the Pentagon on Saturday

cover up for the biggest heist of all time

Former Assistant Secretary of Housing, Catherine Austin Fitts, in a recent lecture, was asked for an update on her 911 thoughts.

She called 911 a cover up for the biggest heist of all time - a systematic looting - 4 trillion gone missing from Pentagon accounting, investigative records of which went down with WTC7 - a big-time scandal, primed and set to break all over the MSM Sept. 10, '01, which literally evaporated Sept. 11. '01.

Any lines on what records were destroyed (or said to have been destroyed) at the Pentagon on 9/11?


I believe that the accountants who were looking for the 2 or 3 trillion missing from the defense department were working in the area in the pentagon struck by the missle . . . oh . . . ah . . . I meant airplane.

Anyone detail what evidence was destroyed in the Oklahoma City Bombing ?

The 9/11 attack was an occassion for all the financial pirhanas to clean the meat to the bone. Never have so many stole so much.

Houston, we have a frustrated would be novelist here!

"since WTC7, although ravaged by fire, was not hit by airplanes as the other two towers were."

"Ravaged" by fire? Hmm...

This is a building ravaged by fire:

The image “” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.

These are the fires "ravaging" WTC 7:

Observe how one has to hunt for a picture to see them clearly? If you have to hunt for a fire, it's NOT "ravaging" anything.

I know I'm preaching to the choir, but this bald faced lying tot about raging out of control fires in WTC7 is getting to me... :(

As for Rosie, "You go, girl!"

Impeachment. Accountability. A better world.

wtc7 or the solomon building as reported by the BBC

My stock reply to . . . . "You're not a structural engineer, how can you be sure of controlled demolition blah blah blah . . ." is "I'm not an aeronautical engineer but if I were about to board an aircraft that was missing a wing, I wouldn't get on it."

Always gets chuckles.

I also don't have a degree in computer science but I assure you that this is a blog.

Ahh . . is collapsing . . . is going to collapse . . . ahhh

The utlimate test for the talking head. The god voice coming into your brain from the embedded plastic speaker is telling you that a building has collapsed that you can still see standing.


I'm not a sound engineer, but I can make an mp3.

I'm not a doctor but I can take aspirin for a headache.

I'm not an environmental engineer but I can clean my air conditioner filters.

Occam's razor
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Occam's Razor)
Jump to: navigation, search

Occam's razor (also spelled Ockham's razor) is a principle attributed to the 14th-century English logician and Franciscan friar William of Ockham. The principle states that the explanation of any phenomenon should make as few assumptions as possible, eliminating, or "shaving off", those that make no difference in the observable predictions of the explanatory hypothesis or theory.

Often paraphrased as "All things being equal, the simplest solution tends to be the best one." In other words, when multiple competing theories are equal in other respects, the principle recommends selecting the theory that introduces the fewest assumptions and postulates the fewest hypothetical entities. It is in this sense that Occam's razor is usually understood.

Looks like dog shit
Smells like dog shit
Tastes like dog shit
Good thing we don't step in it.
(Cheech and Chong)

All I See Is More Evidence

Like 911Veritas, many of us see new evidence every time a reposted video or photo appears. Thanks to CJS for posting, and have a look at the WTC7 pic above.

1. There's no external damage on the fire side of this building other than windows broken (opened) by/for the fire. How did this fire ignite if not from penetration by burning projectiles from other buildings?

2. The fire is burning intensely right at the windows, billowing black smoke as if fueled by a hydrocarbon such as plastic or oil. Did FDNY fire regulations allow WTC7 building contents to be placed right at the windows? What else could have burned right at the windows? Surely not leaking fuel oil.

3. Here's the kicker: look at the right hand side of the building. No visible damage whatsoever other than a completely shattered window, probably in a stairwell. If there were no firefighting operations in WTC7 who or what broke this window? And why? Wouldn't this window function well as a fresh air supply for the fire above or for some person that was required to "maintain" this building during the emergency?

A Bit More Info on WTC7 Eastern Edge Fire...

The fire is burning on the eastern edge 12th Floor, broken window is on the 8th Floor (north-east corner)

Now it gets interesting...

The sole occupier of the 12th Floor is the Securities and Exchange Commission and I would not be suprised if evidence was stored in that location.

FEMA Tenant Details

FEMA Fuel Distribution Data Shows NO Fuel stored on Eastern Edge or 12th Floor

Personally I believe that thermite based incendiary devices were planted at that location to ensure destruction of key evidence and to generate flames and smoke for the witnesses.

Below is my favourite newspaper clipping regarding the SEC and WTC7...

Free Image Hosting at

Best wishes and good luck with your research wainbee

911veritas, let's all keep on truckin'. We're getting close!

Thanks so much for your information. And thank you for showing us all how to scrutinize the detail.

Another one we all need to pursue is Larry Silverstein’s comment on PBS:

"I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, "We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it." And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse."

We've been dwelling on the word "pull" long enough with good success, which he attempted to deflect by saying it referred to "pulling" firefighters.

But just look at the other two goodies:

(1) "they" made that decision.

Is "they" the same party that informed the BBC 20 minutes early that the building had collapsed. Doesn't this put a lot of pressure on the "fire department commander"? We're looking for the source for the BBC report. Was it the "fire department commander"? If not, who directed the "fire department commander" to "pull" the building. Are there any FDNY firefighters that can give us a little more information here? Somebody in FDNY may remember who was giving them advice and direction.

(2) But here's the phrase in Silverstein's comment that may beat the word "pull":

"...and we watched the building collapse."

Think about it! This man has just experienced the most frightening day of his life. Two of his three leased assets in the World Trade Center have just fallen down. He's now made a decision to "pull" his last remaining building in WTC, while everyone else's buildings stand tall. Death and destruction are all around, the smoke and dust are life threatening, America is truly under attack, the world is coming to an end. And at the peak of the apocalypse, Larry and FDNY find the time needed to sit quietly "...and we watched the building collapse." Makes you wonder who supplied the beer.

To repeat, WTC7 fell some seven hours after the twin towers. Knowing that the building might fall from "severe fire damage", who amongst us could calmly stand by, amidst the worst destruction in the US, waiting long enough to watch WTC7 fall down? Lucky Larry has just admitted that he initiated the collapse.

(3) Of incidental concern is the question: When will the EPA and National Building Code regulations be re-written to account for concrete and steel buildings that fall down from fire? We may need to replace steel with high temperature titanium to make our skyscraper business premises safe to occupy. And when will Insurance Underwriters reclassify concrete and steel structures the same as wood frame dwellings that can be easily consumed by fire?

Surely, Building Code regulators and Insurers have learned much about building safety from the engineers and physicists that brought us the official government story, including the wisdom of the editors of Popular Mechanics. When can we expect our skyscrapers to be remediated to these new engineering standards to make our buildings safe again?

How do you know that's the 12th floor?

I can't see the bottom of the building.

I'm not trying to be antagonistic. I'm interested in your source. Is it the FEMA study?


Counted down from the OEM floors...

Which occupied floors 22 and 23.

Marked on this image (click to enlarge)

Free Image Hosting at

Hope this explains

Best wishes

Please blog this, and the one up above too

Hey 911veritas, I hope you are still checking this thread.

Your re-analysis is really good. Can you re-submit both comments as a blog entry? More people will see it. And it will be easier to find if and when anyone needs to support a court case.

Once again, you have added evidence to the case file.

"Evil can only exist as long as we support it."
M.K. Gandhi

So shall we BOCOTT THE MSM?

i agree, you are kicking

i agree, you are kicking some serious ass 911veritas. just added you on Digg by the way. and thanks for the WTC7 tenants link.

Right on Rosie

Never cared one way or the other about Rosie, but she's to be commended for stepping forth from the herd of sheep and calling a spade a spade. 9/11 was an inside job. Time to wake up, people.