Pilots For 9/11 Truth - Press Release

(Release is dated 3/26/2007 as it will be released to the mainstream media tomorrow. -r.)


Contact: Robert Balsamo
e-mail: pilots@pilotsfor911truth.org


Pilots for 9/11 Truth, an international organization of pilots and aviation professionals, petitioned the National Transportation and Safety Board (NTSB) via the Freedom of Information Act to obtain their 2002 report, “Flight Path Study–American Airlines Flight 77,” consisting of a Comma Separated Value (CSV) file and Flight Path Animation, allegedly derived from Flight 77’s Flight Data Recorder (FDR).

The data provided by the NTSB contradict the 9/11 Commission Report in several significant ways:

1. The NTSB Flight Path Animation approach path and altitude does not support official events.
2. All Altitude data shows the aircraft at least 300 feet too high to have struck the light poles
3. The rate of descent data is in direct conflict with the aircraft being able to impact the light poles and be captured in the Dept of Defense "5 Frames" video of an object traveling nearly parallel with the Pentagon lawn.
4. The record of data stops at least one second prior to official impact time.
5. If data trends are continued, the aircraft altitude would have been at least 100 feet too high to have hit the Pentagon.

In August, 2006, members of Pilots for 9/11 Truth received these documents from the NTSB and began a close analysis of the data they contain. After expert review and cross check, Pilots for 9/11 Truth has concluded that the information in these NTSB documents does not support, and in some instances factually contradicts, the official government position that American Airlines Flight 77 struck the Pentagon on the morning of September 11, 2001.

According to the 9/11 Commission Report, which relied heavily upon the NTSB Flight Path Study, American Airlines Flight 77 struck the Pentagon at 9:37:46 AM on the morning of September 11, 2001. However, the reported impact time according to the NTSB Flight Path Study is 09:37:45. Also according to reports, American Airlines Flight 77 struck the Pentagon and by doing so, struck down 5 light poles on Highway 27 in its path to the west wall.

The information provided by the NTSB does not support the 9/11 Commission Report of American Airlines Flight 77 impact with the Pentagon.
Pilots for 9/11 Truth is committed to discovering the truth surrounding the events of September 11, 2001. We have contacted both the NTSB and the FBI regarding these and other inconsistencies. To date, they have refused to comment on, correct, refute, retract or offer side-letters that might explain the discrepancies between what they claim are the data extracted from the FDR of AA Flight 77 and the official story alleging its crash into the Pentagon.

As concerned citizens and professionals in the aviation industry, Pilots for 9/11 Truth asks, why have these discrepancies not been addressed by agencies within the United States Government? Why have they falsely represented their own data to the American people? Pilots for 9/11 Truth takes the position that an official government inquiry into these discrepancies is warranted and long overdue. We call upon our fellow citizens to write to their Congressional representatives to inform them of these discrepancies and call for an immediate investigation into this matter. For more information please visit www.pilotsfor911truth.org


Robert Balsamo
4000+ Total Flight Time
Independence Air/Atlantic Coast Airlines

Glen Stanish
15,000+ Total Flight Time
American Airlines, ATA, TWA, Continental

Captain Russ Wittenberg (ret)
30,000+ Total Flight Time
Former Pan Am, United
United States Air Force (ret)
Over 100 Combat Missions Flown

John Lear
Son of Bill Lear
Founder, creator of the Lear Jet Corporation
More than 40 years of Flying
19,000+ Total Flight Time

Captain Jeff Latas
USAF (ret)
Captain - JetBlue Airways

Ted Muga
Naval Aviator - Retired Commander, USNR

Col Robert Bowman USAF (ret)
Directed all the “Star Wars” programs under Presidents Ford and Carter - 101 combat missions

Alfons Olszewski
Founder Veterans For Truth
US Army (ret)
Aircraft Maintenance Crew Chief

Robin Hordon
Former Boston Center Controller
Commercial Pilot

John Panarelli
Friend and fellow aviator of John Ogonowski - Capt. AA #11
11,000+ Total Flight Time
Eastern Metro, Braniff, Ryan International, Emery
Worldwide, Polar Air Cargo

Lt. Colonel Shelton F. Lankford
United States Marine Corps (ret)
10,000+ Total Flight Time
303 Combat Missions

Captain Dan Govatos
10,000+ Total Flight Time
Former Chief Pilot of Casino Express airlines
Director of Operations Training at Polar Air

George Nelson
Colonel USAF (Ret.)
Licensed Commercial Pilot and Aircraft Mechanic

Dennis Spear
Army Aviator (ret)
7000+ Total Flight Time Operations Officer, Aviation Safety Officer

Captain Joe H. Ferguson
30,000+ Total Flight Time (ret) USAF (ret)

I saw their film

Theres 2 films that everyone should see via the pilots web site (sorry I forget the titles). One is an interview with 4 witnesses to the plane approaching the pentagon, 2 of which are pentagon complex police officers. All 4 describe the plane's approach in vivid detail, but what they explain directly contradicts the official story as to how and from where the plane approached. The second film is a recreation of the flight that supposedly hit the pentagon using flight data provided by the ntsb. This film shows how the altimeter/barometric pressure settings were adjusted when the plane took off and climbed thru 18,000 ft, but was never reset upon descent, making the altitude at the time the plane supposedly struck the pentagon to be around 400 feet. Using their own data (ie gov data) people can continually prove the lie of 9/11.

Everyone should check out these 2 films

Physics/Science/Mathematics do not lie, only people do.
9/11 was an INSIDE JOB

Pandora's Black Box Ch.1&2


Pandora's Black Box - Chapter Two - Flight Of American 77
pilotsfor911truth.org - 1 hr 5 min - Jan 12, 2007 - s (165 ratings)

Pilotsfor911truth.org presents its first full documentary based on the American 77 Flight Data Recorder as provided by the NTSB following the full flight ...

Pandora's Black Box - Chapter 2: Flight of American 77
pilotsfor911truth.org - 1 hr 5 min - Jan 28, 2007 - (22 ratings)

Pilotsfor911truth.org presents its first full documentary based on the American 77 Flight Data Recorder as provided by the NTSB following ... all » the ...

Pandora's Black Box -Chapter Two- Flight Of American 77 p2
nine11Revolution - 32 min - Jan 17, 2007 -
(19 ratings)
Pilotsfor911truth.org presents its first full documentary based on the American 77 Flight Data Recorder as provided by the NTSB following ... Alle » ...

Pandora's Black Box - Flight Of American 77 (trailer)
johndoeXLC - 3 min - Nov 15, 2006 - (18 ratings)
... Pandora's Black Box - Flight of American 77 based on Air Traffic Control, Radar and the Black Box. The First part of the series, Pandora's Black Box - ...

Pandora's Black Box - Chapter Two (trailer)
johndoeXLC - 3 min - Jan 2, 2007 - small full starsmall full starsmall half starsmall empty starsmall empty star (55 ratings)
Trailer for upcoming film - Pandora's Black Box - Flight Of American 77. http://pilotsfor911truth.org

AA Flight 77 Data Recorder pt1-Pandora's Black Box
uneedhelp - 10 min - Jan 22, 2007 - (11 ratings)
AA Flight 77 Data Recorder pt1- Flight Of American Airlines 77

Pandora's Black Box - Chapter Two - Flight Of American 77
nine11Revolution - 33 min - Jan 17, 2007 - (22 ratings)
Pilotsfor911truth.org presents its first full documentary based on the American 77 Flight Data Recorder as provided by the NTSB following the full flight ...

Pandora's Black Box - Flight Of American 77 (New 9/11 docu).avi
http://pilotsfor911truth.org - 1 hr 5 min - Jan 13, 2007 star (31 ratings)
Pandora's Black Box - Flight Of American 77 http://pilotsfor911truth.org Pentagon Sept11 9/11 flight 93 conspiracy theory infowars

Pandora's Black Box: Flight of American 77
Pilots For 9/11 Truth - 1 hr 5 min - Jan 22, 2007 - (16 ratings)
Pilotsfor911truth.org presents its first full documentary based on the American 77 Flight Data Recorder as provided by the NTSB following the full flight ...

Pandora's Black Box - Flight Of American 77 (trailer)
BlogginForTheTruth - 3 min - Jan 13, 2007 - star (7 ratings)
... Pandora's Black Box - Flight of American 77 based on Air Traffic Control, Radar and the Black Box. The First part of the series, Pandora's Black Box - ...

Designed to confuse us?

I think we should be careful with any evidence that the government supplies. The 'five frames' and the black box data come from the government. Both were in the hands of the government for weeks and months before release to the public.

Do people here agree that this alone renders those two sources of evidence suspect? That's how I view it.

Why base theories on such suspect evidence? To me it looks as though these two pieces of evidence, which contradict each other, are meant to confuse.

The whole point IS

that the government is factually contradicting its own reports.

Pilots for 9/11 Truth is simply pointing this out and seeking official government clarification.

If we had a truly non-corrupt and independent news media the headlines across the country would read:


This is the best way to point out to the general public that we have not been told the truth and need REAL investigations.

Their (Pilots for 9/11Truth) careful and methodical approach provides a solid foundation from which we can question the government myth and highlight its obvious problems. Since the government controls all of the physical evidence, our only truly credible (legitimate) way to dispute their claims (aside from the physics at the WTC) is to use the information and reports (FBI, FEMA, NIST, NTSB, etc) they provide to prove that the government myth is false.

It is an unfortunate side-effect that this also fuels rampant speculation, which only weakens our public campaign, imo.

(btw - this info fits with my working theory regarding the Pentagon, LOL@myself)

Many truthers suspect that the government intentionally created, and continues to maintain, ambiguity about the event at the Pentagon to keep the movement divided, waste our time and energy and give the msm, which they control, a quick and easy issue to "debunk" the 9/11 Truth movement with. I'd say that strategy has worked pretty well for them so far, wouldn't you?

No worries, we are growing every day and getting more information every week and they are getting more desperate and starting to make tactical mistakes.

The truth marches on!

I hope that you and yours are well.

The truth shall set us free. Love is the only way forward.

Thank you everyone.

We will need your help to distrbute this release. I have compiled a list of mainstream media emails and will be distributing it tomorrow. I will also be on the Meria Heller show tomorrow.

Spread it far and wide.

Rob Balsamo

Dear Rob

That's cool..........It's getting it into the mainstream that's the challenge
A big thanks to pilotsfor911truth.

Excuse me, but you presume a lot in suggesting that a

flight known as AA-77 was a real flight, and/or that it was anywhere near the Pentagon on 9/11!

For example, how could Hani Hanjour have flown it back 250 miles from Ohio & even find the Pentagon?

There's no Hanni

or Atta or anyone else. The plane (AA77 or a duplicate) was simply flown over the pentagon either by remote or by a military pilot. At the same time prepositioned explosives in/around the pentagon were set off, while either a missle, or a small unmanned aircraft (a3 skywarrior or global hawk) was crashed into the pentagon.

thats one theory

Physics/Science/Mathematics do not lie, only people do.
9/11 was an INSIDE JOB

ALL commercial airliners are flown by "Remote Control"

Pilots do not fly planes anymore. Most modern commercial airplanes are flown by the on-board Flight Management System (FMS) from takeoff to landing, inclusive. (and sometimes taxiiing, as well)

The pilot and copilot are only there in case of emergencies.

Everything is electronic (electro-mechanical) and computerized. (i.e., no more physical wires connecting yokes and peddles and rudders and such -- they use electronic servos with hydraulic assist and things like that)

And it is merely a matter of a few small electronic and/or computer program modifications to make it impossible to turn off the FMS and have complete control over the airplane.

Ad hominem per factum, beyotch!
You are undeservedly egotistical.... often laughably so.
Pseudo-intellectuality does not behoove you.

Good point! So then how could the "Arab maniacs" have

overthrown the FMS & flown the plane back to the Pentagon?

You just turn off the auto-pilot

There's a switch to do that. Or reprogram it.

However, it does kind of kill (no pun intended) the whole "Hani Hanjour (or whatever his name is) not being a good enough pilot to fly the plane" 'theory'. All he really had to do was know how to "program" (enter values into) the FMS. Although why he would program it to fly to the Pentagon and then have it do that big circle before it crashes is a wonderment.

I am of the opinion that someone took control of the plane's FMS system via remote control and disabled the ability to turn it off and programmed it to do what it did. (beforehand someone would have had to mess with it to allow this to be done)

I do not think Flight 77's pilot would have allowed them to take control of the plane away from him, unless they killed him or disabled him, but supposedly, from what the [liar] said his wife supposedly told him when she called him from the plane, that did not occur.

Senior 9/11 Bureau Chief Correspondent


That's briliant,

exactly the kind of thing we need to see happening, more and more research into the inconsistencies of the official story with ZERO speculation on our parts.

I hope this actually makes it into the mainstream media.


"Nothing will benefit human health and increase the chances for survival of life on Earth as much as the evolution to a vegetarian diet." Albert Einstein

Way to go Patriotic and Truthseeking Aviators...

I hope your press release flies well and gets much air time.

Seriously though, great job and much respect.

I hope you create a big wake through the MSM clouds of silence.

Good luck and best wishes to all at pilotsfor911truth.org

I encourage everyone

to print this press release out and mail it to their Congressperson's local office with a short cover letter. Then they won't be able to say they weren't warned when the truth breaks later this year.

We should also all send a copy of this press release to our local daily and weekly newspapers and follow up with phone calls, if you feel so inclined.

Thanks yet again, Mr. Balsamo, for all your continued great work. You and the rest of the pilots for 9/11 truth are true patriots.

I hope that you and yours are well.

The truth shall set us free. Love is the only way forward.

You'd think

after this has been

"released to the mainstream media tomorrow"

there'd be investigative journalists all over it.


Together in Truth!


Pretty heavy duty evidence!

Looks like there was a flyover after all..

And at the very least, proves the official story flat out false.
“We will export death and violence to the four corners of the earth”
~ George W. Bush

I am doing research

on the eyewitness testimony. A complete analysis.

I can tell you that it directly contradicts the NSTB report.

This is a very puzzling issue. I am convinced that the NSTB reports are either fabricated or altered.

Now the question is why? Why make yourself look guilty like this? Even if you believe the pentagon attack was faked (I don’t), why would you release a NSTB report with so many errors in it? Is there a reasonable explanation for the discrepancies? I’d very much like to hear Jim Hoffman look into this issue.

In my opinion the NSTB report does not disprove a plane hit the Pentagon. But it raises alot of important questions. We should demand answers.

There is no sane reason to fly a plane OVER the pentagon after taking so long to reach it and then fake the damage. Where is the motive to do that? There are major highways right next to the Pentagon! There were traffic jams on 9/11. Literally hundreds of witnesses saw the plane crash into the Pentagon.

No one saw it miss.

“We're an empire now, and when we act we create our own reality."

THE plane or A plane?

how fast was Flight 77 supposed to have been going when it allegedly hit the Pentagon again? anyway, are you going to include the people that claim to have seen a "business jet" or a smaller "12 or so person jet" in your analysis or only those that support Flight 77 hitting? also, will you include the fact that many if not most of the eyewitnesses have direct ties to the military and the MSM(mainly USA Today) in your analysis?


For the record there are only 4 statements of a small plane.

Out of hundreds of statements.

And they were all from farther away from the crash site. For example, from an apartment.

Don't worry, I will look at and consider ALL of the anomalies. Including the "missile" controversy.

“We're an empire now, and when we act we create our own reality."

i think its only fair that

i think its only fair that you provide the occupation of the "eyewitnesses" you use to bolster your case though. i think its pretty relevant here. many people will have a hard time trusting the words of military people and media types. i wont even get into the history of the CIA and USA Today. lets just say its called the CIA's favorite paper for a reason and an unusually high number of their reporters were the "eyewitnesses".

Hundreds saw what?

Out of hundreds of statements.

Do all those hundreds state that they saw the plane hit, as you
state above?

This is in progress

But to give you an idea

Approximately 100 people saw the plane hit the Pentagon.  Even more saw the plane of course.  I have about 40 statements from that claiming that the plane went completely into the building.  This would explain why there is not much debris outside of the pentagon.

ZERO saw it miss.  No one.  Everyone who described the color of the plane called it “silver”.  Everyone confirms the plane was flying "very low".   I have over 20 statements confirming multiple traffic jams.  The traffic next to the Pentagon was "stand-still".  Take a look at google maps to see the highways right next to the Pentagon.  From these traffic jams the plane flew over and struck light poles.  The sound of the plane was described as “very loud to deafening”.  There are almost no statements of a “quiet” plane.

A few people described the plane as sounding like a missile.  Two described missile sounds without seeing what happened.  No one saw a missile.

I am going through every single statement and marking it up to prove that I am not missing anything.  I think there are around 200 statements total. 

The testimony comes from two large collections that I have combined, and I've found some more statements that I have also included to form the largest collection of Pentagon statements.

“We're an empire now, and when we act we create our own reality."

Show ""Approximately 100 people" by Sir Rious Mind

now i know

now i know, somethings are not liked to talk about here ;-)

"... a somewhat unfamiliar conception for the average mind." (mp3)
Albert Einstein

"No one saw a missile"

Unlikely that anyone would "see" a missile as they can travel many times faster than an airliner.


Depends on whether you can get away with it

There is no sane reason to fly a plane OVER the pentagon after taking so long to reach it and then fake the damage.

There a plenty of sane reasons to do it - make people think a plane hijacked by Arabs hit the Pentagon, without having to worry about plane debris outside the Pentagon that would inevitably remain in large amounts, and would make it hard to hide that the plane was not Flight 77. What this means is that it would be crazy to fly any plane other than Flight 77 into the building, because it would leave evidence.

What you seem to be saying is that it would be too easy to detect a flyover so therefore they would be too crazy to do it that way. That's an open question for me.

There was probably no "fly over"

Even at 300 to 400 feet altitude, there would have been a pretty strong draft that would have caused the fireball and smoke to be noticeably pulled up over the Pentagon in the direction of the plane's flight, and that was not seen in any of the 3 released videos. (unless they were all highly modified and special effects-created rather than images of the real explosion, which is always a possibility)

Ad hominem per factum, beyotch!
You are undeservedly egotistical.... often laughably so.
Pseudo-intellectuality does not behoove you.


Link : http://digg.com/politics/Pilots_For_9_11_Truth_Press_Release



Thanks and best wishes


Gone for the FULL HOUSE... BUZZ

Added to BUZZ also..

Link : http://www.buzzflash.net/story.php?id=9639

We all know how hard Buzz is... ;-)

Best wishes and good luck to all

that one went bad

that one went bad apparently..

thanks for setting those up!

fricking amazing!

what the fuck is wrong with the BFers?

The true threat to liberty comes not from terrorists but from our political leaders whose natural inclination is to seize upon any excuse to diminish them.
~~ Walter Williams, Nightly Business Report, September 2001

Next week NORAD war game sets up 9/11 Mark II ?

Sorry, no open thread to post this on.

Just posting it because we know that false flag attacks have happened when war games are happening. Cat of Nine Lives (reagan assasination attempt). 911 (10 or more war games going on).

To Denver Post - Next week NORAD war game sets up 9/11 Mark II

Next week's war game script appears to have been written by Lansdowne Technologies and designed to finish what the conspirators failed to finish on 9/11.

We and our Hawks CAFE associates will contact you and the NORAD representatives identified below to demand assurances that you and/or your bi-national planning commanders, such as the incompetent and over-promoted, Lieutenant-General Rick Findley, are not planning a 9/11 Mark II.


As the potential victims of one or more of at least 100 Boeing aircraft which have been illegally modified to fly as 'Clinton-Barzan' missiles in the NORAD war games scheduled for next week, we ask you to do the following.

Stop the games

Ground the planes

Remove the missiles

Please call us if there is anything in the above which needs clarification.

Yours sincerely,

Field McConnell

Tarpley - Iran attack may be set for Good Friday



By Webster G. Tarpley

Washington DC , March 25 --

The long awaited US military attack on Iran is now on track for the first week of April, specifically for 4 AM on April 6, the Good Friday opening of Easter weekend, writes the well-known Russian journalist Andrei Uglanov in the Moscow weekly "Argumenty Nedeli." Uglanov cites Russian military experts close to the Russian General Staff for his account.

The attack is slated to last for twelve hours, according to Uglanov, lasting from 4 AM until 4 PM local time. Friday is a holiday in Iran . In the course of the attack, code named Operation Bite, about 20 targets are marked for bombing; the list includes uranium enrichment facilities, research centers, and laboratories.

The first reactor at the Bushehr nuclear plant, where Russian engineers are working, is supposed to be spared from destruction. The US attack plan reportedly calls for the Iranian air defense system to be degraded, for numerous Iranian warships to be sunk in the Persian Gulf, and the for the most important headquarters of the Iranian armed forces to be wiped out.

The attacks will be mounted from a number of bases, including the island of Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean . Diego Garcia is currently home to B-52 bombers equipped with standoff missiles. Also participating in the air strikes will be US naval aviation from aircraft carriers in the Persian Gulf , as well as from those of the Sixth Fleet in the Mediterranean . Additional cruise missiles will be fired from submarines in the Indian Ocean and off the coast of the Arabian peninsula . The goal is allegedly to set back Iran 's nuclear program by several years, writes Uglanov, whose article was re-issued by RIA-Novosti in various languages, but apparently not English, several days ago. The story is the top item on numerous Italian and German blogs, but so far appears to have been ignored by US websites.

Observers comment that this dispatch represents a high-level orchestrated leak from the Kremlin, in effect a war warning, which draws on the formidable resources of the Russian intelligence services, and which deserves to be taken with the utmost seriousness by pro-peace forces around the world.

Asked by RIA-Novosti to comment on the Uglanov report, retired Colonel General Leonid Ivashov confirmed its essential features in a March 21 interview: "I have no doubt that there will be an operation, or more precisely a violent action against Iran ." Ivashov, who has reportedly served at various times as an informal advisor to Putin, is currently the Vice President of the Moscow Academy for Geopolitical Sciences.

Ivashov attributed decisive importance to the decision of the Democratic leadership of the US House of Representatives to remove language from the just-passed Iraq supplemental military appropriations bill which would have demanded that Bush come to Congress before launching an attack on Iran . Ivashov pointed out that the language was eliminated under pressure from AIPAC, the lobbing group representing the Israeli extreme right, and of Israeli Foreign Minister Tsipi Livni.

"We have drawn the unmistakable conclusion that this operation will take place," said Ivashov. In his opinion, the US planning does not include a land operation: " Most probably there will be no ground attack, but rather massive air attacks with the goal of annihilating Iran's capacity for military resistance, the centers of administration, the key economic assets, and quite possibly the Iranian political leadership, or at least part of it," he continued.

Ivashov noted that it was not to be excluded that the Pentagon would use smaller tactical nuclear weapons against targets of the Iranian nuclear industry. These attacks could paralyze everyday life, create panic in the population, and generally produce an atmosphere of chaos and uncertainty all over Iran , Ivashov told RIA-Novosti. "This will unleash a struggle for power inside Iran , and then there will be a peace delegation sent in to install a pro-American government in Teheran," Ivashov continued. One of the US goals was, in his estimation, to burnish the image of the current Republican administration, who would now be able to boast that they had wiped out the Iranian nuclear program.

Among the other outcomes, General Ivashov pointed to a partition of Iran along the same lines as Iraq, and a subsequent carving up of the Near and Middle East into smaller regions. "This concept worked well for them in the Balkans and will now be applied to the greater Middle East ," he commented.

" Moscow must expert Russia 's influence by demanding an emergency session of the United Nations Security Council to deal with the current preparations for an illegal use of force against Iran and the destruction of the basis of the United Nations Charter," said General Ivashov. "In this context Russia could cooperate with China , France and the non-permanent members of the Security Council. We need this kind of preventive action to ward off the use of force," he concluded.

The truth about 911 is

The truth about 911 is breaking out, and it is not just some internet phenomena like the tv talking heads would have it. Highly trained professionals are going on the record pointing out the glaring anomalies.

Check out my little YouTube 911 video set to a classical music piece - [url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCTQTigO-8E[/url]

Posted the YouTube link

Posted the YouTube link wrong, sorry -


Watched until

the pods appeared.

Not generally regarded best evidence, the opposite in fact.


offtopic - WTC blueprints

I just found this torrent

Here is comment which comes with it.

Inside this ZIP file you will find the entire architectural plans for the World Trade Center. This information was passed from a third party onto Steven Jones, and then onto me, where I uploaded it to our server and seeded it out onto the internet. Excerpts from the letter sent to Dr. Jones: "I was not sure if this information was available and I wanted to make sure that it first went to people who are well versed on the existing material. I have enclosed ... the architectural plans of the WTC Complex in .TIFF format. I have also included the WTC Tower collapse ... data that [we] compiled. My hope is that this can be posted on the appropriate websites and more people can make use of it. I would like to contribute my efforts where I can as I was on the ... team working for Silverstein Group ... in 2002." I'm glad this vital evidence can finally be put into the public domain where it belongs. Many thanks to this individual, and to Dr. Jones for passing this information onto me.

-Dylan Avery Louder Than Words