EDIT: WTC7 Was Burning BEFORE the South Tower Collapsed

(EDIT: It appears there is an optical illusion at work, the object on fire is the other Tower, not WTC7. Moving to blog section. -r.)

This is huge! While digging through the 9/11 archive i found this footage.The west side of WTC7 is burning with the South Tower standing in the background.

There goes the theory that debris from the collapsing South Tower caused the fires in Building 7.

FOX 11:47 PM

Screencapture of the high resolution video:

Link to high resolution XVID (please save a copy of this file on your hard disk and upload it to other video hosters)
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=TUHGLNRE

Link to the streaming movie on archive.org
http://www.archive.org/details/fox5200109112306-2348 (@ 41 minutes)

actually it was always said

actually it was always said that the north tower fell on wtc7.. so if the south tower was still standing that means neither tower had fallen yet.. are we sure this is the south tower?

amazing find!

Not so amazing

>>amazing find!

Actually that video shows the tower behind WTC7 burning, not WTC7 itself.

But nice to have new video.

NO WAY...this is huge

That is building 7 buring right there before the tower fell which means that the fires were set

Look closely...

It's the north tower.

Yeah...

It's the north tower we see burning very close to the edge of WTC7. It would have been to good to be true. And frankly, it couldn't have been unnoticed that day.

OH WELL DAMN

But i do think this line of investigating the time between the 2nd plane hit and the time of the fall is the MOST CRUCIAL time period where we will find any evidence.

Excellent find

Mods: obviously no need to post my blog link to arie's post on Loose Change ;)

BROTHER...THIS IS HUGE...VERY HUGE

It shows that the fires were SET!!!

Cram this video down everyone's throats...get this to Alex Jones ASAP!!!

The fires were set

I have always suspected arson. This proves that I was right. Huge find! Let's see them debunk this one!...........I smell blood.

The tower in the background

The tower in the background is the South Tower.

Please watch my movie: WTC7 The Smoking Gun of 9/11

. Please watch my movie:

.

Please watch my movie: WTC7 The Smoking Gun of 9/11

Also...MAKE COPIES

Everyone should download this to their computer and get ready to reupload it if they try and pull that stuff they did before about the BBC prediction.

Can a mod please change my

Can a mod please change my post where it says:

'debris from the collapsing South Tower '

'debris from the collapsing North Tower'.

Please watch my movie: WTC7 The Smoking Gun of 9/11

That I believe is an optical illusion...

Because the sides of WTC7 are angled, if you was looking along that angle you would be looking at the north tower, appended to the corner of WTC7.

It does not look right (the fire would be on the eastern side, floors 35+.

If you look at this picture, no fire damage is present at all.

Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us

It is deceiving mind you...

Best wishes

Great pic, 911veritas!

Sure looks like some massive explosions just took place to me.

I hope that you and yours are well.

The truth shall set us free. Love is the only way forward.

LeftWright... These Photos are as they come from the camera...

No edits at all with original camera EXIF time stamp and quite rare... (prefixed GJS-WTC)

You can get them via torrent or normal download...

Details in this blog : http://www.911blogger.com/node/7189

Best wishes

Actually that video shows

Actually that video shows the tower behind WTC7 burning, not WTC7 itself.

I think you're right. Maybe the smartest thing is to pull this post. I apologize...i really am too tired.

Please watch my movie: WTC7 The Smoking Gun of 9/11

.

[deleted very enjoyable, but unfortunately unfounded enthusiasm]
______________

interns < internets

That's the EAST side of 7....

...right?

Also, is it possible that the fire might've been caused from plane debris (remember the engine that was found far away on the other side of the South Twin from the impact) that impacted 7? Unlikely, just asking....

I apologize for my mistake.

I apologize for my mistake. Can this please be taken of the mainpage with a comment added that it is just an optical illusion or deleted completely?

Please watch my movie: WTC7 The Smoking Gun of 9/11

Hey, don't let it bring you down!

You're still top man! Your WTC7 video is awesome!
______________

interns < internets

Could happen to anybody....

...honest mistake...don't sweat it....

Your WTC7 video is awesome...

Damn right...

arie, you're doing such a brilliant job, it had me going too...

It's only because I know WTC7 and the WTC like the back of my hand (I even dream about it... doh, not really) that I had to double check...

This is what we are all here for, to help get to the truth...

Love ya man

Best wishes and thanks

No worries, arie

That's why we post things here on 911Blogger, so our brothers and sisters can critique it and help us all get to the truth as fast and accurately as possible.

We're all mere mortals, after all.

BTW - Your WTC 7 video rocks !!!

I hope that you and yours are well.

The truth shall set us free. Love is the only way forward.

you dont have to apologize ;-)

hey, you have done much more investigation and therefore better work as all the "free" press and "free" media in the whole world all together !
;-)

no one of us has to do the whole work - some finds a piece. another makes an analyze, and another makes a video

the best work is done, if it is done with love.

best wishes


"... a somewhat unfamiliar conception for the average mind." (mp3)
Albert Einstein

sorry - it is really difficult to see

at the first glance, i thought the same.
then i extracted all the images in the clip.
the view angle is nearly exactly parallel to the side of wtc7.
only a small stripe is from the sidewall wtc7, the rest is from the tower behind.

even in the extracted image it is difficult to distinguish between the both walls.

best wishes


"... a somewhat unfamiliar conception for the average mind." (mp3)
Albert Einstein

Off Topic. Truckers want all trucking to stop 4/23-35

Sorry, everybody, 99% of the time I post something about 911. I am not trying to distract from 911. This is only to make people aware of what great patriots our truckers are. They are a national resource that needs to be protected.

The traitors Bush and Kennedy plan to allow Mexican truckers to invade our country and destroy the American trucking job industry within 45 days. Isn't this the last straw. I am grieving as I think about how our USA Inc has sold out the 300,000,000 American citizens.

By the way I am not a trucker but I know some truckers and they are patriot of patriots.

Truckers Boycott Border States
"Circle-the-Wagons Blockade Against Anarchy"
http://www.rense.com/general75/truckess.htm

As Americans I think its important that we support the truckers in April. In the big scheme of things its all related: The false flag of 911, North American Union, the Mexican truckers coming into our country, the destruction of the sovereignty of the USA, the Unpatriot Act, the abominable Federal Reserve, the Iraq war.

The truckers have enormous power to bring Washington to its knees. Its time the monster bankers and our mafia governnment learn what a unified populace can do.

6. We invite our truckers to participate in a national "Truck Out" Boycott, on the 23-25 of April, to coincide with the www.FairUS.org rally planned in Washington DC, the "Put Their Feet to the Fire" Press Conference Rally- intended to help the Congress and the Executive Branch understand and appreciate that the U.S. citizen-taxpayers have had enough of the multicultural 'sanctuary' crap.

7. WHAT WILL THE "TRUCK-OUT" ACCOMPLISH ? The point is to shut down all trucking and surround every legislative capital building in every state (and in D C) with a bumper-to-bumper "train" of trucks. We need local truckers to take-over the planning for their state capital.

This can provide a break in the dam so that all the following things can be cleaned up.
1. The ceasing of the North American union.
2. The purging of the criminal elements in our government.
3. Complete investigation into 911
4. A shutting down ot the federal reserve
and a thousand other evils that have polluted our country.

Very interesting

This "Truck-Out" Boycott starts right AFTER the April 15-22 consumer boycott of corporations intended to send a message to Washington to end the illegal occupation of Iraq.

While I would have planned them to overlap for tactical reasons, the fact that one directly follows the other can still be leveraged to good use.

We should support and promote both these actions as we are going to need widespread general strikes and boycotts to force new investigations and we can "piggyback" on these actions to help build coalitions and get the word out.

It's all coming together very quickly, brothers and sisters, time to get our game ON.

The truth shall set us free. Love is the only way forward.

You know what gets Me about the distant photos of the TT?

Is where the center core was, why that plume of dust/ smoke is straight up after collapse. What the hell could disentegrate massive columns like this at such great speed? An interesting analysis is made at The Price Of Liberty website... www.thepriceofliberty.org/
Since the biggest factor of how to wire up the twin Towers to demolish them becomes a sticking point. Ed Ward, via this site, delves into his second analysis of the possibility that demolition nukes were used.
I realize that Steven Jones has mentioned nukes is not possible, but not impossible.
The article has links to Ed's first anaysis of this subject, and cross links to other articles explaining the testing and types of demolition dukes, or mini-nukes as they are more refered to. The testing on these was banned in the early 70's, but could you really believe the government stopped testing these?
Check it out, and decide for yourself to see if this has merit.

The master class has always declared the wars; the subject class has always fought the battles.

I really don't think any kind of nuke was involved.

If there was, the surrounding structures would have been destroyed too (as well as the people who were nearest the towers when they came down). That's just my take on it, though.

And according to demolition expert Van Romero, the destruction of the towers could have been achieved using conventional explosives placed in strategic points in the buildings.

I think it's best to leave nukes, space beams, super duper death rays from Building 7, etc.. out of the 9/11 truth movement's talking points. They do a lot more harm than good.

_______________
"We are going to keep up this fight till the end, till the very end... They took it from the top to the bottom. We're gonna take it from the bottom to the top!"
-Dan Wallace

To a point of what type used would affect people

If the core was the only part these were used, the rest of the demolition would require only conventional explosives. Yes I do agree Stallion, not using this arguement is a good idea, but the article has interesting data to sift through. It's here...http://www.thepriceofliberty.org/ward.htm

The master class has always declared the wars; the subject class has always fought the battles.

I'm not convinced at all...

that conventional explosives couldn't have accomplished the destruction of the twin towers, including the cores.

But at least most of us can agree (I hope) that fire and structural damage didn't do it ;-)

_______________
"We are going to keep up this fight till the end, till the very end... They took it from the top to the bottom. We're gonna take it from the bottom to the top!"
-Dan Wallace

I certainly agree with that

Fire and structural damage does not end up looking like Mt. St. Helens erupting.

The master class has always declared the wars; the subject class has always fought the battles.

Pyroclastic flows are common in CDs

however, if there truly were mini-nukes in the basement, why the early basement detonations? Makes no sense, right?
______________

interns < internets

That's going to be explained

That's going to be explained as coming from 2nd plane impact debris projectile(s) . That doesnt help the "WTC7 Pulled" hypotethesis.

That even damages the "payphone" explosion video (10:16AM)..