WHO's Giving Aid and Comfort to the Enemy?


Defenders of the official 9/11 story argue that those who question the government are giving "aid and comfort to the enemy".

Are they right?


First, let's look at the events leading up to the 9/11 attacks.

As reported by the New York Times, the FBI had penetrated the cell which carried out the 1993 world trade center bombing, but had -- at the last minute -- canceled the plan to have its FBI infiltrator substitute fake power for real explosives, against the infiltrator's strong wishes (summary version is free; full version is pay-per-view). See also this TV news report.

And the CIA is alleged to have met with Bin Laden two months before 9/11.

Indeed, the government appears to have trained a number of the hijackers at military bases.

Investigators for the Congressional Joint Inquiry discovered that an FBI informant had hosted and even rented a room to two hijackers in 2000 and that, when the Inquiry sought to interview the informant, the FBI refused outright, and then hid him in an unknown location, and that a high-level FBI official stated these blocking maneuvers were undertaken under orders from the White House.

And an organization virtually controlled by the CIA provided funding to the 9/11 hijackers.

Moreover, it is undisputed that the administration had numerous warnings of a specific nature about the attacks, and yet failed to take any real action to stop the attacks.

Didn't these government acts give aid and comfort to the enemy?


The evidence is overwhelming that the government allowed the attacks to succeed (if you don't believe that, skip ahead and read up about the 9/11 Commission, and then come back to this section).

Indeed, elements of the government may even have actively carried out the attacks.

Didn't that give aid and comfort to the enemy?

The Investigation

After the attacks, the government engaged in a cover-up and whitewash of epic proportions. For example:

Military officials lied to the Commission, and the Commissioners considered recommending criminal charges for such false statements, yet didn't bother to tell the American people (free subscription required).

• The co-chairs of the Commission now admit that the Commission largely operated based upon political considerations.

• 9/11 Commission co-chair Lee Hamilton says "I don't believe for a minute we got everything right", that the Commission was set up to fail, that people should keep asking questions about 9/11, that the 9/11 debate should continue, and that the 9/11 Commission report was only "the first draft" of history.

• 9/11 Commissioner Bob Kerrey said that "There are ample reasons to suspect that there may be some alternative to what we outlined in our version . . . We didn't have access . . . ."

• Former 9/11 Commissioner Max Cleland resigned from the Commission, stating: "It is a national scandal"; "This investigation is now compromised"; and "One of these days we will have to get the full story because the 9-11 issue is so important to America. But this White House wants to cover it up".

• The former head of the FBI said there was a cover-up by the 9/11 Commission

• The very 9-11 widows who had pressured the administration to create the 9/11 Commission now "question the veracity of the entire Commission’s report", and have previously declared it a failure which ignored 70% of their detailed questions and "suppressed important evidence and whistleblower testimony that challenged the official story on many fronts".

• A former FBI translator who Senators Leahy and Grassley, among others, have claimed is credible, and who the administration has gagged for years without any logical basis -- has stated that "this administration knowingly and intentionally let many directly or indirectly involved in that terrorist act [September 11th] go free – untouched and uninvestigated".

• The tape of interviews of air traffic controllers on-duty on 9/11 was intentionally destroyed by crushing the cassette by hand, cutting the tape into little pieces, and then dropping the pieces in different trash cans around the building as shown by this NY Times article (summary version is free; full version is pay-per-view) and by this article from the Chicago Sun-Times.

• There are indications that false evidence was planted to deflect attention from the real perpetrators.

Didn't the fact that the investigation was an obvious farce give aid and comfort to the enemy?


The anthrax attacks -- which were sent along with notes purportedly written by Islamic terrorists -- used a weaponized anthrax strain from the top U.S. bioweapons facility, the Fort Detrick military base. Indeed, top bioweapons experts have stated that the anthrax attack may have been a CIA test "gone wrong"; and see this article by a former NSA and naval intelligence officer; and this statement by a distinguished law professor and bioterror expert. It is also interesting that the only congress people mailed anthrax-containing letters were key democrats, and that the attacks occurred one week before passage of the freedom-curtailing Patriot Act, which seems to have scared them and the rest of congress into passing that act without even reading it. And it might be coincidence, but White House staff began taking the anti-anthrax medicine before the Anthrax attacks occurred.

And the CIA commander in charge of the capture stated that the U.S. LET Bin Laden escape from Afghanistan.

Don't those acts of treason give aid and comfort to the enemy?

Another False Flag Attack

Many very smart people are saying that elements within the U.S. government are planning to carry out a false flag attack and blame it on Iran, in order to justify war against that country. For example:

• A current Republican Congressman has said "a contrived Gulf of Tonkin-type incident may occur to gain popular support for an attack on Iran".

• A former National Security Adviser told the Senate that a terrorist act might be carried out in the U.S. and falsely blamed on Iran to justify war against that nation.

• A retired 27-year CIA analyst who prepared and presented Presidential Daily Briefs and served as a high-level analyst for several presidents stated that if there was another major attack in the U.S., it would lead to martial law. He went on to say:

"We have to be careful, if somebody does this kind of provocation, big violent explosions of some kind, we have to not take the word of the masters there in Washington that this was some terrorist event because it could well be a provocation allowing them, or seemingly to allow them to get what they want."

The former CIA analyst would not put it past the government to "play fast and loose" with terror alerts and warnings and even events themselves in order to rally people behind the flag

• The former UN Weapons Inspector, an American, who stated before the Iraq war started that there were no weapons of mass destruction is now saying that he would not rule out staged government terror by the U.S. government.

• A member of the British Parliament stated that "there is a very real danger" that the American government will stage a false flag terror attack in order to justify war against Iran and to gain complete control domestically.

And, as General Tommy Franks has said, if another terrorist attack occurs in the United States "the Constitution will likely be discarded in favor of a military form of government" . Likewise, Daniel Ellsberg, the famous Pentagon Papers whistleblower, said "if there is another terror attack, "I believe the president will get what he wants", which will include a dictatorship.

Wouldn't that give aid and comfort to the enemy?

Indeed, a wide variety of very high-level U.S. military officers, congress people, and other patriotic Americans believe from across the political spectrum believe that not questioning 9/11 gives aid and comfort to the enemies.

In the final analysis, the real question is whether the most dangerous enemies are "inside the gate" or somewhere on the other side of the world. Anyone who enables the biggest criminals is giving aid and comfort to the enemy. If the most ruthless killers are, indeed, inside our country, than the talking heads and shills who support their lies are the ones giving aid and comfort to the enemy.

I am not saying that there are not some radical Islamic terrorists. There might be a handful. However, as everyone from the Los Angeles Times to the BBC have shown, the threat from Al Qaeda has been vastly overblown (and see this article on who is behind the hype). Indeed, a former National Security Adviser told the Senate that the war on terror is "a mythical historical narrative".

Moreover, according to to the Pulitzer prize-winning reporter who uncovered the Iraq prison torture scandal and the massacre against Vietnamese civilians, high-level U.S. government officials are currently helping to fund Al-Qaeda.


THAT was a powerful entry.
The youtube link you provided says it all about how our government operates, and it really gives a look into how 9/11 was carried out.

Here's the link again for anyone that wants to cut to the chase.

Fantastic post.



This is exactly the kind of work the Truth Movement needs to be putting out. Light on theory and speculation, heavy on well documented facts. Bravo GW.

This is the kind of thing someone in congress or other official types could get behind without the worry of ridicule.

Off topic

Anyone seen this yet? its new to me! I found those jayweffers (JREF'S) talkin" about it! ....Jayweffers say that they are talking about it over at loose change blog. It appears to be a pretty good live shot of the SOUTH FACE of WTC 7. lots of smoke, but little fire and little damage. Income=corporate profit

another off topic

Just saw this on Al-Jazeera: link

Oops...Duh.... heres the link

That is an excellent shot.

I've never seen it before anyway, shows very little damage.

That said, I don't get the thinking behind the 'damage' argument. Common sense says if it was that 'damaged' from the towers collapse it should have fallen almost immediately, not five+ hours later & defiantly not straight down, penthouse first. .

This should be front page.


It was discussed


interns < internets

Damn, how'd I miss that.


Missed it too!

ahhh yes..... arie has been very busy lately!

(rest well arie)!---------------------Income=corporate profit

Keep 'em comin'...

GW... Let's take these bastards down.

"So where is the oil going to come from?... The Middle East, with two-thirds of the world's oil and the lowest cost, is still where the prize ultimately lies."

Richard Cheney - Chief Executive Of Halliburton

Another aspect to this...

If you follow the official line, and believe the attacks were carried out solely by 19 individuals under the direction of 2 individuals living in a cave, then this Administration is aiding and abetting murderers.

They did so by creating a Commission that had NO intention of carrying out a real investigation.

"So where is the oil going to come from?... The Middle East, with two-thirds of the world's oil and the lowest cost, is still where the prize ultimately lies."

Richard Cheney - Chief Executive Of Halliburton

Hey GW...

You forgot one. I'll let Seymour tell you about it.

"So where is the oil going to come from?... The Middle East, with two-thirds of the world's oil and the lowest cost, is still where the prize ultimately lies."

Richard Cheney - Chief Executive Of Halliburton


thanks, Jon. I added Seymour into the postscript.


"So where is the oil going to come from?... The Middle East, with two-thirds of the world's oil and the lowest cost, is still where the prize ultimately lies."

Richard Cheney - Chief Executive Of Halliburton

Strange Days

As more people become aware of the truth about 9/11 we seem to have reached a strange crescendo where the so called progressive media is losing credibility due to it's decision to pretend they don't understand what happened that day.

Building 7 Damage

Outstanding work, GW. Thanks for all you've done.

This is a great clip of 7 before it was imploded. Considerable damage is evident to the SW upper corner. Yet more evidence of explosives-driven debris. There's a powerful segment in "9/11 Mysteries" showing huge beams sticking out of buildings adjacent to the towers.

The evidence is already overwhelming.

great work, GW

You should re-post entries like this every month. It's a solid argument, a great refresher for old hats, and an excellent intro for newbies.

Please add:

Aiding the enemy from the very beginning:



To the contrary, identifying misinformation:

What a joke and half baked farce, this shoddy explanation.
Citing an CNN expert... Muahaha.
And no, Mudjahedeen were not arabs? Not aiding the Mudjahedeen? Now what?
The fake every nut, bolt and screw.

And what about Tim Osman?

very good blog-post. There

very good blog-post.
There is enough in it for LEGAL RUBBER TO GRIP THE ROAD ...

but there are no prosecutors. Like what they told Indira Singh:

Shut up and go away, or you will be killed.


I particularly find this lead fascinating:

, all the way back to Al Kifah, which was the financing vehicle at the center of the WTC bombing in 1993, all the way back to Maktab al Khidamar, which means ‘the Office’ which was a financing vehicle that was set up by the CIA, for the Pakistani ISI, back in the days when Osama bin Laden was America’s fair-haired boy, and was on our side fighting with the Mujahadin, fighting the Soviet Union.

So, the question to me was, my goodness, what was Maktab al Khidamar doing being run out of P-Tech on 9/11? And the reason I say being ‘run out of P-Tech’ is that the faces in the videotape were the faces of core employees at P-Tech.

Now, remember, this is a small company, there are only one or two people who had access to the source code at P-Tech and that is a very trusted position, and he was one of them, his name was Suheil Laheir.


The notion that the whole 911 was computer-controlled ... strikes me as irrefutable.
Therefore computer-based evidence is plentiful.
Therefore many people KNOW.
Therefore many people SHUT UP.

will make the 3rd Reich look like a Tea Party.


... And most people are looking for exit strategies, you might say, leave the country, go to France, go to Canada, but, there are no exit strategies for this.

All of this stuff took money to fund. And it was funded through major financial crimes, money laundering, and looting, looting of the SNL's, looting of the banking system, what we're in the middle of now which is the looting of Social Security. And this is all being done, the looting of HUD, it' all being done systematically to keep the slush funds up for the game at play.

BF: Where do you think this is headed?

IS: Not any place good for people. And it isn't just going to be America, it is going to be global.

BF: Well, Indira Singh, thank you very much.

FULL TEXT: http://u2r2h-documents.blogspot.com/2007/03/911-was-executed-computer-co...

Speaking of...

Giving aid and comfort to the enemy, a report just came out that says the United States has given $10B in aid to Pakistan since the 9/11 attacks.

We will make no distinction between the terrorists who committed these acts and those who harbor them. - George W. Bush


Incidentally, I don't consider the country of Pakistan our enemy. Just the individuals in it that are helping the American Empire succeed.

"So where is the oil going to come from?... The Middle East, with two-thirds of the world's oil and the lowest cost, is still where the prize ultimately lies."

Richard Cheney - Chief Executive Of Halliburton