Bill Maher Discusses Bush's 9/11 Non-Reaction On Olbermann

Bill Maher is asked if there is one question he would put to Bush, what would it be? Maher says he would confront Bush on why he completely failed to immediately react after he was told America was under attack on 9/11.

Michael Rivero of What Really Happened has an excellent comment:

"Better to ask why the US Secret Service Protective Detail failed to react."

Olbermann and Maher must know the truth

Makes you wonder eh?

of COURSE they know

Look it's not like we're the only people with more than three brain cells to rub together.

Complicit--Mass--Media. Nuff said. We've been expecting these clowns to suddenly change their tune as soon as someone pointed out the emperor had no clothes on. Thank you Rosie and Charlie Sheen (and a few others) The rest of you just shut up and go away. You had your chance. You chose poorly. We will not let you forget. The BEST thing you can claim to be is a coward. That goes for Olbermann, Colbert, Stewart, Letterman, Leno, etc. etc.


Real Truther a.k.a. Verdadero Verdadero - Harvard Task Force


Mitigating Circumstances for Bill

Bill did already lose one show for speaking his mind about 9/11 in the early days. It's not an excuse, but it counts for giving him some slack.
The Eleventh Day of Every Month

That was supposed to be his cue

Getting fired from ABC should have been his cue to speak up against tyranny, instead he turned his back on his country. Now it looks like he might be getting a little nervous about his traitor status - and with good reason!

The Eleventh Day of Every Month

yeah, but HBO pays him

yeah, but HBO pays him pretty well so........

Deep down most know, even O'reily.

The crux of it is... who do You serve?, The self through the master, or humanity through self. There are many in the media that are either positioning themselves for the cause when the timing is right and/or Perhaps they are waiting for the right moment to jump on the 911 truth bandwagon when they feel it is safe enough.

WADR: That's a rather asinine position, imo

EVERYONE comes into 9/11 Truth at a different point. Some earlier, some later. That's just the way it is. It's the nature of the beast.

Look how long it took Sheen. And Rosie is just now speaking out. Ed Asner spoke out and seems to have backed off a little. (afaik) And there are a few others. Eventually Olbermann and Maher and Jon Stewart, and some others, will also get to the point where they will feel the need to speak out publicly.

Some people think the 9/11 Truth and Justice Movement is dead and/or dieing. And I understand their impatience and frustration. But the movement is, literally, in its infancy. We probably don't even have 1% of the population behind us. And it takes 5% to 10% (+/-) to form a "critical mass".

Part of the problem is that most people in the movement are not activists. Not really. And those that are, the majority, are new activists. They have no experience or frame of reference. (which is partly why the movement is so disorganized right now) And we don't even have any strong leaders in the movement yet. Although people like Griffin and Jones and some others are playing the part, whether they like it or not, and some will eventually become the leaders that are needed.

Having been in the Animal Rights Movement for over 20 years, I have "seen it all". I remember the irritation and impatience and frustration and outright anger when it looked like "things aren't happening fast enough and nothing is changing!" However, now that I can look back on it, I do see all of the MANY changes that have been made and how the movement has progressed and how much more aware and informed and educated people are about all of the many AR issues. However, there is so much more still to do.

And I can even see the changes in our movement over the last couple of years, smallish as they are.

So people need to calm down and try to understand the way these things work, and keep fighting the good fight, and become more active (activist) if they can, and enjoy every little victory, and the occasional large victory, etc. And try to see the forest for the trees.

Senior 9/11 Bureau Chief Correspondent

sorry, not buying

the way these things work? this is not like any other activist movement. it is not a matter of opinion, like "fur is immoral". no one should need to be convinced of the need to speak out. the question is--do you know. i know people who know and do very little about it, and i know people who are doing a lot about it. i can forgive joe and jane six pack for not quite getting it yet, or for being so brainwashed that they have a genuine psychological issue iwth this. infotainmenmt celebrities have no excuse as far as I'm concerned. they are pundits. their job is to tell people about stuff. if after five years they have either failed to notice or failed to understand that we are right i can't believe it is anything other than the most base opportunism--they are serving the perps' interests and they know it.

of course they are going to lie whenever they realize they have no choice but to "come around"-- they will make up a story about how they were totally fooled. a lot of people will believe them, because they will WANT to believe them. just like some people want to believe now that they just don't know, or are scared. it's not that most people in the world are scum--far from it. most celebrities are pretty scummy though, let's face it. and they're proving it as we speak.


Real Truther a.k.a. Verdadero Verdadero - Harvard Task Force


I disagree

You obviously don't know how "movements" work. Which I surmised from the tone of your initial post. It doesn't matter if it's the Animal Rights Movement (which I only used as an example), or the Environmental Rights Movement, or the Human Rights Movement, or the Civil Rights Movement, or the Equal Rights Movement, or any of the hundreds, if not thousands, of other "movements". (many of which I have also had years of experience in and dealing with and working for) They all basically work the same.

I also suggest that it is not as "black and white" as you portray the problem. It never is. And beware of those who portray things like this in that light, just as much as those that also attempt to portray them in thousands of shades of gray. (both usually for similar reasons of attempted argument, reasoning, shady logic, and the like, which is almost always fallacious, with appropriate agendas, hidden and not)

And, you are absolutely wrong that "it is not a matter of opinion". Opinions on various aspects of the 9/11 Truth and Justice Movement are legion, which is why we have arguments, and discussions, and "theory wars", and dissension, and fighting and infighting, and all the rest.

And, of course, you, for the most part, neglected to respond to my "EVERYBODY comes around to it in their own time and way", which was my main point. If that were not the case, then we would already have our new investigation and "everyone" would have agreed that there was a problem by 2002. The facts of how things have occurred over the last five years (i.e., the increased numbers of people moving toward, believing in, embracing, etc., "9/11 Truth"), and will occur over the next five years, disproves and belies your contention.

Not to mention that people in the "public eye", who have careers based on that fact, have much to lose by "speaking the truth" (as they see it), as do "normal people". Bill Maher has already been burned once, so I wouldn't blame him if he was gun shy. Steven Jones has been negatively affected — to what eventual degree remains to be seen. And there are others.

Perhaps you are one of the überParanoid "New World Order"ers who "new from minute one" that 9/11 was an inside job and all the rest, or have been advocating 9/11 Truth since very early on. If you are the latter, good for you — you are one of very few. If you are the former, then I suggest that anyone who "knew from the outset" was merely exhibiting irrational thought and behavior.

And, in fact, I also feel comfortable with the comment that anyone who "absolutely knows for sure" that 9/11 was "an inside job", or whatever, is also fooling themselves. Because there is no way to know for sure. Not yet, and maybe never.

But I believe that it is valid to say that one can know "beyond a reasonable doubt", and perhaps even "beyond a shadow of a doubt". However, to say that you "know" without qualification is no different from someone saying, as merely an example, that they "know" Jesus Christ is their personal Lord and Savior and died on the cross for their sins.

There is a difference between belief and knowledge. And people often like to confuse the two, especially when it serves their purpose. But to do so is, again, irrational thought and behavior.

Senior 9/11 Bureau Chief Correspondent

"When the game is over, the king and the pawn go into the same box."

9/11 Truth is the Path to Peace


somebody try to get a tape of todays episode of Inside Edition. they did a segment on Rosie and her latest on air 9/11 comments. they even showed a clip of WTC7. here is an old Rosie/9-11 story from the website:

Has Rosie Gone Too Far?
Has Rosie O'Donnell finally gone too far? That's what some people are saying after Rosie posted an excerpt from a wacky 9/11 conspiracy theory on her website suggesting that certain elements in the U.S. government were involved in blowing up 7 World Trade Center.

Fox's Bill O'Reilly and MSNBC's Joe Scarborough both expressed outrage, with Scarborough saying, if he were Barbara Walters, he would kick Rosie off The View.

Rosie's website continues to reprint excerpts from a 9/11 conspiracy website that suggests a faction in the government was responsible for 9/11, and not the terrorists.

Television commentator Mary Murphy told INSIDE EDITION Rosie is, "Very outspoken and at this moment she can say anything she wants." But she pointed out that Rosie didn't say anything on television, rather she said it on her blog.

Actor Charlie Sheen from the hit sitcom "Two and a Half Men," has also spoken out in support of the bizarre conspiracy theory, saying the government's story doesn't make sense.

Sheen and Rosie did not respond to INSIDE EDITION's requests for comment.

The conspiracy theories have been thoroughly debunked, but it seems some strange ideas are hard to kill.

Heh. Gotta love those blanket statements the MSM throws out

"The conspiracy theories have been thoroughly debunked", they say.


It'd be a lot funnier if it weren't so sad that many people will read that one sentence and presume it to be true without evaluating it.

Fascism Lite - Now with 75% less mass murder and 25% more public appeal!


Did the Secret Service know that the President Of The United States was in absolutely no danger whatsoever, not 5 miles from an international airport, at a time when the country was "under attack" from kamikaze hijackers in commercial airliners?

"So where is the oil going to come from?... The Middle East, with two-thirds of the world's oil and the lowest cost, is still where the prize ultimately lies."

Richard Cheney - Chief Executive Of Halliburton


Rivero has repeated for years that this is THE biggest smoking gun of 9/11. No physical evidence to debate, no creative limited hang out explanations. Strong.


Don't know who Rivero is. Keep in mind, the President Of The United States also didn't receive any air cover until 11am that morning. On a day when the country was "under attack" from kamikaze hijackers in commercial airliners.

It seems to me the only people that were actually in any danger that day were those that the true culprits of 9/11 decided to sacrifice in order to further their fascist agendas.

"So where is the oil going to come from?... The Middle East, with two-thirds of the world's oil and the lowest cost, is still where the prize ultimately lies."

Richard Cheney - Chief Executive Of Halliburton

Rivero runs

News editor at The Watchman Report,, delivering 9/11 truth to the Christian community

I'm familiar...

With the sites, just not the person.

"So where is the oil going to come from?... The Middle East, with two-thirds of the world's oil and the lowest cost, is still where the prize ultimately lies."

Richard Cheney - Chief Executive Of Halliburton

well on his site, he has

well on his site, he has several 9/11 articles that he puts up links to on the front page from time to time, and one of the main ones he always puts up is his article on the secret service and 9/11, "the dog that didn't bark".

News editor at The Watchman Report,, delivering 9/11 truth to the Christian community

yeah, its a great site.

yeah, its a great site.

And the same said Ray

And the same said Ray McGovern.

Assassination attempt?

Considering a van filled with Arabs tried to interview Bush that morning (6:30 a.m.) while he was out jogging, the Secret Service certainly should have been on high alert, if not even canceling the event all together knowing that the children were in harms way.

From cooperative research:

An Assassination Attempt?

Bush awoke a little before 6:00 a.m. on September 11, pulled on shorts and an old T-shirt and laced up his running shoes. [CBS, 11/1/02] At 6:30 a.m., Bush, a reporter friend, and his Secret Service crew took a four-mile jog in the half-light of dawn around a nearby golf course. [Washington Post, 1/27/02, Washington Post, 09/11/01]

At about the same time Bush was getting ready for his jog, a van carrying several Middle Eastern men pulled up to the Colony’s guard station. The men said they were a television news crew with a scheduled “poolside” interview with the president. They asked for a certain Secret Service agent by name. The message was relayed to a Secret Service agent inside the resort, who hadn’t heard of the agent mentioned or of plans for an interview. He told the men to contact the president’s public relations office in Washington, DC, and had the van turned away. [Longboat Observer, 9/26/01]

The Secret Service may have foiled an assassination attempt. Two days earlier, Ahmed Shah Massoud, leader of Afghanistan’s Northern Alliance, had been murdered by a similar ruse.

I've always believed this was in the mix

I believe 9/11 was supposed to be bigger and even more freakier. Afterall, if elements were going to attack its citizens, why not do it as big as possible.

I believe the Capitol was supposed to get hit with all the Congressmen inside, but this was thwarted by the plane being delayed, and eventually the passengers revolting, which meant it had to be shot down.

I believe Bush was supposed to be shot while the cameras were rolling, in front of the school kids, by another patsy or someone pretending to be Arab. The shooter of course would be blown to smitherines.

This explains Jeb's order for martial law he enacted in FLA before 9/11. I believe Bush was the black sheep of the Bush crime family and therefore a lamb to the slaughter.

I also believe something went terribly wrong with all these plans as a result, you have the President sitting there....

The passengers revolting against whom? Do you still believe

that there were "terrorists" aboard those planes box-cutting the pilots & crew to death, and then flying the planes for hundreds of miles??? I sure don't!!!

uhhh what part of middle eastern says arab?

most of the middle eastern men riding vans on 9/11 seem to have been Israeli...


Real Truther a.k.a. Verdadero Verdadero - Harvard Task Force


Juxtaposed with Cheney's SS guards...

See Thompson's Timeline.

Cheney describes being nearly picked up and carried to the bunker by the SS.

I've wondered if Bush's SS guards weren't ordered to make him wait and sweat it out. Sort of a way to let him know that he really wasn't in charge and expendable so, he'd better play his role the way they had rehearsed. I say rehearsed because of his comments to the kid several weeks later about seing the first plane hit on teevee ("some bad pilot"). That's always made me think that it had all been rehearsed beforehand. Bush just couldn't keep it straight. Was what he had seen live or was it memor(y)ex.

Rivero doesn't discuss Cheney's account of his experience in "The Dog That Didn't Bark." I think that he should revise it since that has been documented.

The true threat to liberty comes not from terrorists but from our political leaders whose natural inclination is to seize upon any excuse to diminish them.
~~ Walter Williams, Nightly Business Report, September 2001

Bill's email address

Here is Bill's email address, tell him to wake up.

Here is what I wrote Bill
Hi Bill,

I saw your appearance on the Countdown with Keith Olberman, where you would ask GW why he sat there while the country was under attack. I have a pretty good idea why.

I know you are going immediately dismiss this, but, just follow my logic here for a few moments.

Imagine you are the president, and you have been hearing the whispers around that the US is about to launch the big one, the false flag event that will allow the US to begin executing the plans hatched by PNAC. You do not know the details, and the less you know, the better. Dick Cheney tells you, don't worry, everything is under control.

You are now in Florida on 9/11. You here something about the first plane, OK, but the Secret Service around you is agitated, things don't seem quite right, but you go into the classroom. When Andy Card tells you the second tower has been hit, it all comes crashing in. They did it! What am I supposed to do now? What if they can't pull this off, and the plot is exposed?

If you look into GW's eyes during the 7 minutes or so, do you see a frantic, oh my god what do I do? I don't, I see a chilled look, a look of confusion, they really did it, now what do I do.

Your complete dismissal of the 911 Truth Movement is well known. Frankly, being a fan, I don't see how you can completely dismiss it. Any reasonably intelligent person with good critical thinking and logic skills would have to see the Official Story is a cover up. I believe you think that GW and Cheney are not smart enough to pull this off. They didn't have to do a thing, all Cheney would have to do is wink and nod to whoever ran this black operation, and they would do the rest. This operation would not need to be planned in the Whitehouse, and certainly would not be.

I hope you are willing to keep an open mind to the possibility of 911 being an inside job. For me, a mechanical engineer, who has analyzed the facts in great detail for many years, there is no doubt that 911 was an inside job. It is now at the point that it can scientifically be proven that WTC 1, 2, & 7 could not have collapsed in the fashion that they did from fires and airplane impact damage.

It is a bit like the matrix, this conspiracy theory simple seems too far fetched to be true, but trust me, take that red (or was it blue pill), look into it with an open mind, and you will see the light.


Truth Surge

For more on Pat Tillman and 911 and Osama Bin Laden watch 911 Truth Surge

India had a hand in 9/11

and/or the coverup. I have very little doubt left about that. at the very least they are helping the perps frame pakistan. but i think it may be more than that...


Real Truther a.k.a. Verdadero Verdadero - Harvard Task Force


Would you please fill me in?

What moments of suspicion are there? I haven't looked into India at all, I have to admit...

But I'm always curious.

interns < internets

I'm on the same page here with you.

Check out Cheney's experience documented at Thompson's Complete 9/11 Timeline.

It's the opposite of Bush's.

The true threat to liberty comes not from terrorists but from our political leaders whose natural inclination is to seize upon any excuse to diminish them.
~~ Walter Williams, Nightly Business Report, September 2001

Fahrenheit 9/11

I went back and watched Fahrenheit 911 for the first time in years. With all we know today, its clear (at least to me) that Fahrenheit 9/11 was just another propaganda piece designed to control and limit the conversation on 9/11.

Bill Maher still hammering this point because he has been allowed (by someone) to criticize Bush on this point. He doesn't dare ask Bush why WTC 7 was not included in the 9/11 Commission Report.

Olbermann won't even go there. BTW, why break the tension of Bill's remark with a corny one liner Keith. What the hell is so funny!?!?!
"Cogito ergo sum"


Go back and watch F911, and when it gets to the part where Card whispers into Bush's ear, imagine him saying, "Everything is going according to plan" instead of what he allegedly said. It makes it an entirely different movie.

"So where is the oil going to come from?... The Middle East, with two-thirds of the world's oil and the lowest cost, is still where the prize ultimately lies."

Richard Cheney - Chief Executive Of Halliburton

Not to mention that he

Not to mention that he doesn't have enough time to say "A second plane has hit the World Trade Center. -- America is under attack" per the Administration's story.

Unless he's a former auctioneer. 'twould be a coincidence, but there are plenty to be had.

Bill Maher, Jon Stewart,

Bill Maher, Jon Stewart, Steven Colbert, Keith Olberman, Michael Moore, Luis Black, (most of) Air America...all GATEKEEPERS designed to lull us into a trance that says: "we don't have to worry about it, our heroes on TV are taking care of it for us". Bullshit.

It's up to US, folks. It's just a matter of time till we have to take our movement into the streets...fulltime, using non-violent civil disbedience as our "weapon".

OT: "What we call the news"

The line about Britneys "putty tat" makes this another Jib Jab instant classic.

Jib Jab: "What we Call the News"
"Cogito ergo sum"

Bill Maher is a left

Bill Maher is a left gatekeeper who agrees the administration lies about everything that comes out of their mouth....but believes them on 9/11.

Lay off the bong long enough to wake up Bill.

I think that the person

I think that the person impersonating the elected POTUS
didn't react because :
a: he was still thinking about how horrible that pilot was
b: he was in shock from watching the FIRST plane hit WTC
(maybe he saw it on BBC ? they seem to predict the news, not just report it :) )
" Q : One thing, Mr. President, is that you have no idea how much you've done for this country. And another thing is that, how did you feel when you heard about the terrorist attack? (Applause.)

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you, Jordan. Well, Jordan, you're not going to believe what state I was in when I heard about the terrorist attack. I was in Florida. And my Chief of Staff, Andy Card -- actually, I was in a classroom talking about a reading program that works. I was sitting outside the classroom waiting to go in, and I saw an airplane hit the tower -- the TV was obviously on. And I used to fly, myself, and I said, well, there's one terrible pilot. I said, it must have been a horrible accident.

But I was whisked off there, I didn't have much time to think about it. And I was sitting in the classroom, and Andy Card, my Chief of Staff, who is sitting over here, walked in and said, "A second plane has hit the tower, America is under attack."

And, Jordan, I wasn't sure what to think at first. You know, I grew up in a period of time where the idea of America being under attack never entered my mind -- just like your Daddy's and Mother's mind probably. And I started thinking hard in that very brief period of time about what it meant to be under attack. I knew that when I got all of the facts that we were under attack, there would be hell to pay for attacking America. (Applause.)

I tried to get as many facts as I could, Jordan, to make sure I knew as I was making decisions that I knew exactly what I was basing my decisions on. I've got a fabulous team. A President can't possibly be President without a good team. It starts with having a great wife, by the way. (Applause.)

And so, I got on the phone from Air Force One, asking to find out the facts. You've got to understand, Jordan, during this period of time, there were all kinds of rumors floating around. Some of them were erroneous. Obviously -- for example, there was a news report saying that the State Department had been attacked. I needed to know what the facts were. But I knew I needed to act. I knew that if the nation's under attack, the role of the Commander-In-Chief is to respond forcefully to prevent other attacks from happening. And so, I've talked to the Secretary of Defense; one of the first acts I did was to put our military on alert.

An interesting thing happened shortly thereafter. Condoleezza Rice -- who was not with me but was with the Vice President because they were in the White House compound -- called me on Air Force One after that, and said that she had gotten a call from Russia, from Vladimir Putin, who understood why we were putting our troops on alert, and, therefore, wasn't going to respond. That was an important phone call. Because when I was coming up, and a lot of other older-looking people here who were coming up with me -- (laughter) -- that would never have happened in the past. An alert by the United States would have caused Russia to go on alert, which would have created a complicated situation. But that wasn't the case.

red herring

look, we know Bush's english isn't so good. i saw a plane hit the tower could well mean i saw a plane HAD hit the tower. meaning he could have seen the hole in the north tower on tv and said to himself "a plane hit the tower (at some point in the past)" that to me is easier to believe than some closed circuit transmission where Bush got to watch the first plane hit. I think Bush was in the dark. I think he was caught off guard by all this. think about it--if you were the perps, would YOU let this jackass in on your plans? or would you make sure that the one man who could pardon your sorry ass had plausible deniability and also a good reason to act in a convincing manner? that look on his face was quite literally cluelessness, i think.


Real Truther a.k.a. Verdadero Verdadero - Harvard Task Force


That Bush misspoke about watching the first plane hit is....

...highly possible, IMO.....and I agree with much of this, but I don't think he was left entirely out of the loop....look closely at his face after he is told by Card....he looks to the right, then kind of SUPPRESSES A SMALL SMILE......

My interpretation is that he knew something was going to happen, he just didn't know when until that moment.

yes, he may be an idiot, but :

He says that he actually SAW the first plane hit WTC on TV.
That is impossible since the footage of the first attack
( filmed by the Naudet-brothers who just happened to be there
because of a non-existing "gas-leak" ) wasn't released until the following day .
" I was sitting outside the classroom waiting to go in, and I saw an airplane hit the tower -- the TV was obviously on "

and he has said it TWICE; there is a video of him saying the
same thing before an audience .
Why make up excuses for him ? I don't buy the incompetence
excuse. If anything is a red herring it is the claim that it all
happened due to incompetence . This is just another example
of the outright lies they feed us . Are we to believe that the SS
just ignored the first attack and let him sit as a lame duck
at a pre-disclosed location ?
A point everyone seems to be missing about the stand-down is the fact that the UN held meetings in NYC .
High-ranking Government officials (both elected and non-elected) from every single country in the World participated and where prevented to return to their countries
for days ( unlike the Royal Saudis and the Bin-Ladins who
where at the Carlyle-groups annual investor-meeting )
Are we to believe that the US chose to hold multiple "drills"
making security non-existent while NYC is filled with
representatives from all Governments in the World ?


Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Last frame, Calvin says... "I'm not going to think about that". (Right-click to view image)

Calvin and Hobbes

That says it all so perfectly. Great find. By the way the historical Calvin and Hobbes are very interesting and influential characters.

4:20 p.m.: U.S. Sen. Bob

4:20 p.m.: U.S. Sen. Bob Graham, D-Florida, chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, says he was "not surprised there was an attack (but) was surprised at the specificity." He says he was "shocked at what actually happened -- the extent of it."

Considering who he was meeting with, I wouldn't be surprised either.

///////////////////// - $1 DVDs shipped - email for info

O'Reilly is just about ready to slam Rosie again...

and asks... "What will ABC do about her?"

///////////////////// - $1 DVDs shipped - email for info

Don't spoil it for me!

I'm on the West coast and I like to go into these things fresh.

Why is Olbermann not covering the Rosie stuff?

Bill O'reilly is all over rosie and the 9/11 stuff.
Since olbermann positions himself as the anti-o'reilly, shouldn't he cover it and give his side of the story?

that is a GREAT point

why don't any left gatekeeping shills stick up for Rosie?

bastards. in jail--every one of em.


Real Truther a.k.a. Verdadero Verdadero - Harvard Task Force


Left gatekeeepers are worse than the GOP brownshirts

This is painful to admit, but the left gatekeepers have done even more damage to the US than the obvious administration brownshirts.

Here is my point. There is a certain faction of people in the US who have been yearning for fascism for a long time. I know. My brother is one, my sister's husband is another. These folks would gladly continue marching behind Bush even if 9/11 was revealed to be an inside job done "for the good of the country". They don't really need Beck, Limbaugh, Savage, O'Reilly, Coulter, etc. The ugly Americans had rascist, xenophobic, and even genocidal tendencies long before any of those media personalities emerged. They will back any war, any domestic repressions.

On the other hand, there is a large group of people naturally opposed to aggressive war, genocide, and loss of civil liberties. It was vital to get these folks to buy into the 9/11 mythology. If the left wasn't fooled, the domestic chaos would be much worse than the 1960s. So the role of the left gatekeepers was crucial. They built credibility with wit and opposition to many obvious GOP stupidities. Then they spent their political capital selling the administration's biggest lies. Without the hard work of Maher, Olbermann, Colbert, Stewart, and yes, even Michael Moore, the 9/11 myth couldn't have lasted so long. These traitors deserve the same fate as the obvious administration minions, when Nuremberg II is convened.

you've nailed it, my friend

the idiots are easy to manipulate by the millions with a Limbaugh and OReilly. Those who think a little more need the concerted efforts of the witty and more nuanced pros you listed. In the end, they are all on the same team. Let's never forget Al Franken either. What a scumbag. And Dennis Miller--what is UP with all these SNL people??


Real Truther a.k.a. Verdadero Verdadero - Harvard Task Force


In defense of SNL

Their stock market skit from 2003 (!) is teh shitz:

Straight Talk About Today's Stock Markets


interns < internets

he can't cover it because to

he can't cover it because to cover the questions fairly would expose the 9/11 lie. That's why the mainstream news only has the Bushites covering 9/11 truth. What is Keith Olbermann going to do? Bring up the fact that the government STILL hasn't explained how WTC 7 fell? Is he going to show the clip and say hey, that does look like controlled demolition, maybe these conspiracy theorists aren't so crazy after all. Is he going to rebut O'Reilly's point that all 9/11 truth people are crazy liberals by showing all of the former government officials from the right that have gone public? Is he going to put Paul Craig Roberts on air? No, because it would eviscerate the credibility of the official story. These MSM gatekeepers have to just ignore it because they realize how weak the government's story is.

News editor at The Watchman Report,, delivering 9/11 truth to the Christian community

Hey folks, if you haven't

Hey folks, if you haven't can you vote for the Rosie story on Netscape here:

Also leave a few messages while you are there and vote up the positive posts.  Netscape plays a little nicer than Digg, so this is worth doing.


Total gatekeeper, i remember him specifically addressing the 911 truth movement and calling us dumb, because how could we ever think the administration is so COMPETENT enough to pull it off. Dumbass.

"I will not withdraw from this war even if Laura and Barney are the only ones supporting me." -George W. Bush

Bill Maher is weak.

I totally agree with you Abby. He is a lazy minded fool on this topic. The COMPETENT story is stupid in my opinion. They had no incentive to get New Orleans right or to help those people, you can call it incompetent if you want, which is also true, but.. the had every incentive to get 9/11 right. Their war on terror, middle east oil, patriot act, etc all depended on it. Geez. I get so pissed at people who act tough like Bill Maher and can't handle the truth.

Off Topic

I hate to be off topic but I've been posting here long enough to give me ONE random plug, right?
The Seattle Truth site needs some support. I'm new in Washington state and I attended my first Seattle 9/11 Truth meeting tonight. Please help support us:

Tonight in Seattle, at the Douglas Truth Library, around twenty 9/11 Truthers met to discuss the best ways to spread 9/11 Truth and prepare for future terror attacks. The meeting was well organized and the passions were high as the core members of 9/11 Truth Seattle prepped for the upcoming visit from David Ray Griffin and shared their most effective strategies in the library's conference room.
I urge you all to check out their website and show them some much needed support. Just simply registering to their site and participating in the 9/11 chat would be a huge boon for 9/11 in the state of Washington.
Keep spreading the truth!

Bush knew…

On 9/11 Bush’s elementary school photo-op was know in advance…how hard would it be to drive a van full of explosives into the school?
Why didn’t the SS act?