New 9/11 Truth Statement from Daniel Sunjata

Daniel Sunjata, co-star of the critically-acclaimed FX Network television series, Rescue Me, spoke out today for 9/11 Truth. In a lengthy statement to the website, Sunjata offered his thoughts about how a small group within our military and government could have been complicit in the terrible events of 9/11.

Sunjata is a versatile actor who received a Tony Award nomination for Best Actor for his starring role in the Broadway play, Take Me Out. He appeared in Woody Allen's 2004 film, Melinda and Melinda and in the 2006 movie The Devil Wears Prada with Meryl Streep. He plays the starring role of Reggie Jackson in the upcoming ESPN mini-series, The Bronx is Burning.

Here's Sunjata's statement (the rest of this post is Sunjata's direct quote; note that the Patriots Question 9/11 web page will be updated later tonight to include the quote):

I would like to respond to the question, "How could a small group within our military and government have been complicit in the terrible events of 9/11 without the entire government being aware of it?"

My response is that the whole government would not have to be in on the alleged conspiracy for the following reason; our government is a hierarchy in which compartmentalization of knowledge is a given. As suggested by the symbol of the pyramid, the tier below does not necessarily know everything that the tier above knows, and the tiers above that are privy to even more sensitive and "classified" intelligence and so on. Even within common tiers you see this compartmentalization where "the left hand knows not what the right hand is doing."

Sounds dark and conspiratorial but that's the fact. In fact it is the official excuse given by the establishment for how such a thing as 9/11 could have happened on their watch. It is therefore quite possible (even probable) that an operation of this magnitude could be carried out without the willful participation of the entire government.

For instance, the NORAD and FAA air-traffic controllers could well have been ignorant of the alleged plot, yet innocently participated in its being carried out. The commonly accepted stance of those urging for a truly independent reinvestigation of 9/11, is that it is a rogue faction within our government and military who hatched and perpetrated this unholy atrocity through the agency of our ISI funded assets like Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaeda (ISI is the Pakistani version of our CIA, created and funded by our CIA). One strong piece of evidence in this regard (albeit circumstantial, though one would expect that FEMA, NIST and The 9/11 Commission would have probed this with duly diligent scrutiny) is the fact that India's press and subsequently the FBI both reported that Mohammed Atta had received a $100,000.00 money transfer from the head of Pakistani ISI, Chief Lt. General Mahmoud Ahmed, three days before the attack. Also General Ahmed was in the U.S. from approximately Sept 9th to Sept. 13th (DURING THE ATTACK) meeting with (among others) George J. Tenet, the then CIA Director, and Porter Goss, the future Director of the CIA.

Isn't it reasonable to subpoena General Ahmed and those he secretly met with during the 9/11 attacks and question them under oath regarding the substance of their discussions and the nature of their relationships? Especially given the public record of ISI's dealings with and funding of known terrorist organizations, one of which happens to be Al Qaeda, and the revelation of the general's $100,000 "donation" just before the murder of 2972 souls?

It is the avoidance of such obvious questions as these, of which there are literally hundreds (most of them posed by The Family Steering Committee during the 9/11 Commission's so called investigation) which begs greater scrutiny of the official story. When a 7 year old girl is found raped and dead in the cellar of her family home, as painful and politically incorrect as it may be to question and treat as suspects the parents who claim to have been sleeping soundly during the rape and strangulation of their loved one...such protocols are standard procedure in homicidal investigations. Shouldn't the same protocols be followed in the case of domestic mass slaughter, where a government who claims to have been asleep at the wheel during the said atrocity is partially staffed and run by people who have published a document outlining a 30 year plan for global economic and military hegemony and "full spectrum dominance" characterized by a permanent military presence in the middle east and cheap access to that regions oil reserves? Especially when the same document states that "this process of transformation is likely to be a long and arduous one, absent some cataclysmic and catalyzing event like A NEW PEARL HARBOR?"

Speaks to possible motive, no? I say yes. What say you?

Here is a link to the documentary, 9/11: Press For Truth, the first-person account of The Jersey Girls [Kristen Breitweiser, Patty Casazza, Monica Gabrielle, Mindy Kleinberg, and Lorie Van Auken] ; four widows who lobbied 441 days to get the Bush administration to open an investigation into the events on (and leading up to) 9/11. They helped spearhead The Family Steering Committee, did years of research in the process, and felt that 70% of the burning questions they had posed on behalf of the victim's families went completely unanswered, since to address them would have lead the Commission into "painful and politically incorrect" territory. Do their words carry any weight, or are they just crazy conspiracy theorists as well? You decide..."


Get this service

And do a cold call blitz to get 100 more of them on record re: 9/11.

Since we're on the verge of critical mass regarding 9/11, now would be the time to do this.

Now that we're on "the cusp"..

We need to be feeding this community, who also happen to be the most infuencial people in the world..

Better yet,

the stars who HAVE come out for 9/11 truth should lobby the other stars on the set, at parties, over lunch, etc...

I'm sure, everybody, by now, has sent an e mail...

to ABC, Rosie, Barbara, The View, etc. That's all we can do, stuck here at our desk. Alex Jones is right, We need all the people in the spotlight to speak up. It's time to quit being afraid, and ask questions. Make the whole thing news that cannot be ignored.

We can do much more..!

see my post above yours..

You're right....

It's our job, to do. Nobody else is going to do it for us. Thank you Robert.

Just think how satisfying it will be...

as you drop the requested info pac with a couple DVD's in the local mailbox, knowing who you are sending it to ;-)

Their "sphere of influence" each one of them is vast. Just look at what Rosie O'Donnell just accomplished with a mere mention of it on "The View".

There are about 50,000 of them altogether.

Let's DIG IN then eh?




Don't forget that sending people to patriotsquestion means you are telling them that these people are 911 patriots (without telling them what they really advocate) -

Morgan Reynolds - no planes hit the WTC
Judy Wood - energy beams destroyed the WTC
David Shayler - holograms covered missiles hit the WTC
Jim Fetzer - promoting all of the above directly to millions of viewers in any way he possibly can (listed front and center on the professors page).

There is no reason for these people to be on that site.

The value of the credentials

The value of the credentials of people on that site far outweigh the unfortunate fact that people who seem to be hurting the movement are inlcuded.

A different problem

Do all the people listed on that site really understand what it means to question the official story? I'm beginning to wonder. What, for example, is Peter Lance doing there? Sure, the information which he has researched is valuable for truthers to know, but he still uses his interpretation to buttress the official story all the way. Even his statement on this website--which is supposedly devoted to 'question[ing] 9/11'--makes reference to 'intelligence failures' and the 'failure to stop bin Laden's 12 year juggernaut'. What's up with that? How does this constantly regurgitated pseudo-critical critique amount to 'questioning' the official story? Isn't that, too, a way of misleading visitors to the site regarding what it means to seek the truth about 9/11? That may have amounted to skepticism back in, say, 2002, but we've moved way beyond that by now. Even for those who aren't yet fully convinced that 9/11 was an inside job--they should at least not swallow huge chunks of the official story in their entirety and treat them as beyond question.

Really glad to have this guy on board...

I heard his interviews on Gary Franchi's Lone Lantern radio show on the Genesis World Report, and the guy is really articulate and knows his shit....

And, as an added bonus, he's telegenic...get a camera on him going over 9/11 and let's get every sorority girl in America on board.... :)

I want that "middle third" of the population, both sides are fighting for, one demographic at a time.... :)

Scroll about a third of the

Scroll about a third of the way down this page to download his newest 2-part interview on Lone Lantern Society:

(I'm betting on his selection as the cover model for a "9/11 Truther Studs" calendar.)

"9/11 Truther Studs" & "9/11 Truther Dolls"

I like the sound of that! That's really not a bad idea LEH. Maybe we could throw something together and sell it for charity money to help the 1st responders. I'll volunteer my mug for it >; ) ! Jon Gold, make it so!

"... In questions of science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of a single individual." (Galileo Galilei, 1564 - 1642)

Girls Gone Wild

I created a flyer and posted it in the laundry room . . . the ladies stopped and looked.

This is the best

...the best statement I've heard from a star yet. He says it right and doesn't enter into territory that might turn people away or against... and he seems to know his stuff, he's done some checking and wasn't just wowed by watching one flick.

THIS is the guy we want in any debates. He'll eat them alive.

Though I'm sure Alex Jones... while not my favorite, would be an awesome debater... he seems to have some kind of perfect memory for all sorts of ridiculous facts and figures and details.

Thank you Daniel!

Yes!! Thank you!!

(Listen to Friday, April 13th Alex Jones Interview 8 minute clip)