State-Sponsored Terror in the Western World
State-Sponsored Terror in the Western World
Extracted from Nexus Magazine, Volume 14, Number 2 (February - March 2007)
by Philip Coppens
Inner Terror: Your Government Doesn't Mind Killing You
One of the most controversial and least discussed aspects of Western society is the notion that Western governments would be able to, let alone actually, kill their own civilians. But is reality far worse than what we seem incapable of imagining?
In the movie V for Vendetta, a police detective ponders: "I want to ask a question. I don't care whether you answer me or not. I just need to ask this aloud... The question that I have to ask is: what if the worst and most horrifying attack in this country's history was not the work of religious extremists?" His assistant objects: "We know it was. They were caught. They confessed." The detective adds: "And they were executed. I know. And maybe that's really what happened... What if someone else killed all those people? Would you really want to know who that was? Even if it was someone working for this government? That's my question. If our own government was responsible... was responsible for the deaths of almost 100,000 people, would you really want to know?"
On 31 December 2006, three people were killed in the Thai capital Bangkok. The military-backed interim regime blamed the ousted prime minister, Thaksin Shinawatra, and his supporters as prime suspects. But US security expert Zachary Abuza said that "it could be the military trying to justify further crackdowns", thus demonizing the former prime minister so that it could continue to enforce martial law. Whom to believe?
One of the major stumbling blocks to accepting a major conspiracy (such as the claim that 9/11 was an "inside job" performed or allowed by the authorities) is the unwillingness to believe that a nation's institutions would kill its own civilians. Thailand is not a stable Western nation and many believe that the Western world is free of such atrocious acts, whereas the sad truth is that since World War II many Western nations have seen a long series of state-sponsored terrorism-directed against its own citizens...
Continued...
http://nexusmagazine.com/articles/StateTerror.html
- Login to post comments
hey duncan roads (publisher of nexus)...
i'd classify this as limited hangout. then again, maybe you were too busy emailing david icke about the shape-shifting reptiles and ufos again to properly research the subject at hand.
http://www.whale.to/b/wilder3.html
is this the kind of internet magazine deserving of a front page spot? yeah, if you prefer the doggy paddle to the breaststroke.
___________________________________________
"Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And when you look long into an abyss, the abyss also looks into you."Friedrich Nietzsche, Beyond Good and Evil 89 (1886).
http://anti-neocons.com/
NEXUS Magazine
Nexus Magazine describes itself as "an international bi-monthly alternative news magazine, covering the fields of: Health Alternatives; Suppressed Science; Earth's Ancient Past; UFOs & the Unexplained; and Government Cover-Ups." Not the part about UFOs.
The bottom line: The more connections we at 9/11 Truth make with UFO nutters, the weaker our case becomes.
Well, the case doesn't
Well, the case doesn't become weaker, but the unwillingness for newcomers to take the case seriously might go up. This isn't to say that having an interest in "ETs" is unacceptable...there's nothing wrong with it...especially considering that there are zillions of galaxies in the universe. However to lump it in with the 9/11 truth movement is feeding the propaganda machine that seeks to stifle our movement.
So, just think of it in terms of 'apples and horses'. Nothing to do with one another. As long as this publication discusses the 2 topics seperately at all times, I see nothing wrong with it. David Icke on the other hand, is a sketchy one. One of the greatest speakers on 9/11 I've ever heard, but the lizard thing leaves me relying on people like David Ray Griffin and Webster Tarpley.
So...nothing to see here folks! (seriously though)
Nexus
I came across this article myself just yesterday, and I thought what a wonderfully well written overview for those who don't know what's happening to them now.
So, until you can claim to provide ultimate clarity to those in the abyss, I wouldn't liken Nexus to your contrived mind-lock concerning UFO's.
Lastly, I have personally seen a 350' black triangle craft float about 600ft above my car, and whether it was built at Area 51 or not, you're in no position to debunk their existance.
No, the real problem here is "mind-control," and some of the bloggers are so far up the river of hype that they don't remember what our country was built on. And, rather than criticize that which others are doing to awaken the masses...
-You get the picture.
1968
seen a UFO close 25 feet
silver metallic with bright blinking multi colored lts .
It was hovering and observing us
We were stunned and observed it.
It began to move so I fired up my 62 Corvair and followed thrugh the burbs a short distance and it disappeared behind a big old oak tree
The newspapers received a few calls that nite and some related strange stuff
I have a living witness and would be happy to offer testimony
Whats funny is MOST of my pals believe me
BUT I do NOT expect to be believed
sorry to be off topic
http://rigorousintuition.ca/board/viewforum.php?f=8
ts gordon, aka 9/11 insider leaving the country soon
anyhooooo, i don't have any particular aversion to UFOs or mind control.
i have common sense.
associating with UFOs helps 9/11 truth as much as chupacabras and space beams do.
oh yeah, that "wonderfully well written overview"...zero mention of israel, hence, the limited hangout.
just ask victor ostrovsky what an honest article it is.
hey tom, one more thing before i call it a night, good luck with that US air force account. i hear they have bottomless pockets.
___________________________________________
"Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And when you look long into an abyss, the abyss also looks into you."Friedrich Nietzsche, Beyond Good and Evil 89 (1886).
http://anti-neocons.com/
but ...WHO DID 7/7?? and
but ...WHO DID 7/7?? and why?
7/7 like Bali and 11march spain and the placing of Mohammed ATTA in Hamburg, Germany
all done to implicate the local intelligence services (THEY) and force their continued silence.
Here is how:
I (WE) am the CIA or Mossad and I need the foreign spy-agencies help to keep quiet about my 911 atrocity and other evil false flag murder in Iraq and around the world.
How do we achieve this?
Easy. WE find out which muslims they are having undercover contact with, and "help" THEM to justify ever higher budgets by supplying THEM with info about how dangerous the muslims are. WE let THEM give us documents that show how THEY are in contact with the "muslim terrorists" ...
Next, WE make the muslim terrorists throw bombs and kill many innocents in a most public bloodbath. WE do this activly, we supply the bombs, we even organize drills etc... no matter how WE do it, we are safe. THEY will never be able to implicate us, because they risk a public outcry if WE go public with the documents.
The only way THEY can get out of this is to wait a generation.
In the 7/7 case:
MI5 and MI6 must now make a believable case against muslims, however contrived,
to keep up the veneer of "honest fight against terrorism" and stop the CIA from feeding the documents to newspapers, documents that show how MI5 INSTIGATED DOMESTIC TERRORISM.
As they did. Kind of. MI5 did not plant the bombs, the CIA did. But they will not sound believable should THEY claim it in their defense.
Does this make sense to you?
Solution? IMHO for us PEOPLE the solution is to get rid of ALL INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES.
It is better to HAVE NO SPIES that have employ spies that work against OUR COMMON GOOD.
We may have to suffer some consequences, but a government can never have the trust of the people, worse, can never really achieve any human progress, if it can be blackmailed.