Google video "What we saw - Bob and Bri"
4truth Mon, 04/09/2007 - 3:16pm
Check out this newly released home video made on 9/11. It was taken from a 36th floor apartment window 500 yards from the WTC complex.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5370762387415552903
Two things stood out:
1) At about 7 minutes and 44 seconds into it, notice what appears to be several flashes occurring on the lower floors of the north face of the north tower.
2) At 19 minutes and 42 seconds into the video when the north tower is collapsing, it doesn't appear that WTC7 was hit by enough debris to cause the building to later collapse.
In any case, it was taken from a most interesting vantage point and experienced researchers may find a bit of useful info contained within this 26 minute clip.
- 4truth's blog
- Login to post comments
and at 7:54 look at the
and at 7:54 look at the portion right above the topmost of the dark bands (sky lobby)
____
♠
Real Truther a.k.a. Verdadero Verdadero
WTCdemolition.com - Harvard Task Force
It would be interesting to
It would be interesting to compare it to the Naudet Brothers documentary. I'm sure there's something fishy about that one,
Here's an interesting perspective on the Naudet Brothers film:
JULES NAUDET'S 9/11 FILM WAS STAGED, By Leslie Raphael:
http://72.14.253.104/search?q=cache:Syx1kxDad2sJ:911foreknowledge.com/st...
i first saw that
on a no-planer site, but I do think that the Naudets were plants... the perps wanted to make sure they had good footage for some heart-wrenching propaganda.
____
♠
Real Truther a.k.a. Verdadero Verdadero
WTCdemolition.com - Harvard Task Force
I think it's worth looking at the Raphael piece
on its own merits -- even though it's posted at Serendipity, it's arguing something I find much more believable than no-planery. There are just one hell of a lot of weird coincidences with that film.
i look at EVERYTHING
only then do the different pieces start to come together and make sense. the knowledge is out there, it's just encrypted in BS... :)
____
♠
Real Truther a.k.a. Verdadero Verdadero
WTCdemolition.com - Harvard Task Force
Think about it. It's daring,
Think about it. It's daring, perfect propaganda and it's always possible to do what nobody will believe...
and hey, check out the part of the Naudets Brother documentary where they meet each other back at the firestation, after they thought each other were dead. They just stand next to each other , not saying anything for a while, then they hug, but still , it's seems so odd to me. Then they say something in French which I cannot hear properly, even though I speak French.
Oh, and notice, that famous shot of the second plane hitting the south tower, the one where the plane comes from the back and over the right shoulder: this filmer cleary says: "Ah, Oui! " Is this French speaking person one of the Naudets? Did anyone look into it?
That's either some very fine acting...
or, what I believe is more likely, the brothers signed on to something they had not been given the full story about. They could have been maneuvered into the right place at the right time. OTOH, the Naudets=Duane St thing is pretty weird.
Weird
The firefighters from that house were the first on scene.... and not one of them died.
The Naudets cooked them a fine french dinner the evening before 911?
They were both in exactly the right place at the right time to catch all the perfect shots.
they went to the WTC in the days before to film the lobby just in case they needed the footage.
They were there for 6 months prior and hadn't gotten anyhting firefighting related on film.
This was their first and last film project?
Who was funding them?
Lots of weird stuff but they captured amny shot which help with our cause
___________________
Together in Truth!
no, it was not their first
no, it was not their first project. They made one prior to this one:
from : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jules_Naudet_and_Gedeon_Naudet
Their first film, "Hope, Gloves and Redemption," (2000) on boxers in the Bronx, included coverage of the 1998 New York Daily News Golden Gloves tournament.
Not newly released
It's been out for quite awhile.
I wish they would have gotten the second plane hit on film. I guess they quit filming for awhile and started filming again after the second hit.
It's interesting that the woman (Brianna?) states that the second plane was a military plane. But, I suppose we have to take that with a grain of salt since she's a civilian who may or may not know much about airplanes, military, or commercial, or otherwise.
----
Senior 9/11 Bureau Chief Correspondent
http://www.chico911truth.org/
"When the game is over, the king and the pawn go into the same box."
9/11 Truth is the Path to Peace
"I guess they quit filming
"I guess they quit filming for awhile and started filming again after the second hit." - don't just pay attention to the dramatic parts, but notice what the woman filming says. She clearly says that she will go to the hospital and see if she can help with something. I am sure such a helpful person turned this video over to the police and that's why you don't see the second hit and why it took 5 years for this video to be released.
I have absolutely no doubt that she filmed the second impact, but we are not allowed to see it for some reason. They admitted that the video was edited by them and they had promised an unedited version, but they now say they have no time for it. Yes, that is the explanation. Oh, so 2800 people die on that video, but they don't have time for it. BS!
I hadn't heard that
I always thought the "editing" at the point where they show after the second plane hit looked a little odd. At first, my paranoia kicked in and I screamed, "Conspiracy!" and "They must be hiding something!", etc., but it is possible, and maybe even (more) probable, given the time period between plane one and plane two, that they simply stopped filming, and then quickly grabbed the camera again after the second plane hit. (or even jerked it up and around, or whatever, and missed the shot)
The "we're too busy" comment doesn't hold water, though. Although, if they know that there isn't really much on the tape that is of any value than what they showed, then that could be the reason for their not thinking it's a big deal. However, just in case they are wrong, they should release it "for posterity", and the like.
I also suggest that there are MANY more videos and photos that we have never seen. Camcorders, cameras, both film and electronic, cell phone cams, etc., are SO prevalent, that there pretty much has to be more out there that we have not seen, some of which is probably important.
----
Senior 9/11 Bureau Chief Correspondent
http://www.chico911truth.org/
"When the game is over, the king and the pawn go into the same box."
9/11 Truth is the Path to Peace
i disagree that she stopped
i disagree that she stopped filming, but that's just my oppinion,
but I totally agree that there must be many videos out there , that we haven't seen yet. The question is, how to get people to release them?
Quality
does anyone know where to find a higher quality copy of this film? divx or xvid... the "flashes" look like glints of light of the lens. the same glints can be seen throughout the film.
i disagree
the flashes look like they're coming from the building and are consistent with what eyewitnesses reported. if they were glints of light on the lens wouldn't tehre be some lens flare? And I don't see anywhere else in the vide where flashes such as the ones at 7:44 and 7:54 occur. If anything maybe they were edited in, but..... I dunno--doesn't seem likely...
____
♠
Real Truther a.k.a. Verdadero Verdadero
WTCdemolition.com - Harvard Task Force
There are higher-quality versions around
I don't remember where, but they exist, or used to, because I saw them. Do a Google search. (for "bob and bri" and variations)
----
Senior 9/11 Bureau Chief Correspondent
http://www.chico911truth.org/
"When the game is over, the king and the pawn go into the same box."
9/11 Truth is the Path to Peace