VIDEO: Definitive Proof that 9/11 was an INSIDE JOB!

This video is EXCELLENT! It is the most definitive proof of the fact that 9/11 was an INSIDE JOB that I have seen. Please spread this around FAR and WIDE.

(NOTE: If anybody has a YouTube link on this, please post. Otherwise I will be uploading to YouTube tonight).

-Chris Rose

Good video!

It sounds like the guy who did the 'Bush Jr. killed JFK Jr.' video (which I also liked even though it was highly speculative). This 9/11 video is persuasive and touches most of the points that I like to see. I'm not sure the contrails-for-anthrax-delivery bit at the end is a good idea; I like to avoid paranoid speculation even though I'm inclined to believe it myself.
Too bad the url at the end,, just goes to a 'coming soon' empty site. Otherwise, great work, thanks.

You're right! This is one of the best 9/11 inside-job videos

I've yet seen! It should be front page on 9/11 Blogger, IMO!

Superb video, 20 minutes is

Superb video, 20 minutes is also a good length of time to ask someone to watch a video on internet. People are sometimes too overwhelmed to sit and watch a 2 hour video on their computer, but for a 20 minute video this is brilliant.

Excellent Video - Thanks

If someone says not to have 20 minutes to watch -
show this before

how to show 911-videos to the public ?

go in a TV-shop at the rush our, and ask someone, you want to test the DVD-Player.
Then insert the DVD with this videos.

be creative !!!

"... a somewhat unfamiliar conception for the average mind." (mp3)
Albert Einstein

Excellent not proof

I agree that this is an excellent video that concisely argues the case that 911 was an inside job. I agree with that conclusion.

HOWEVER, "proof" is a very sharp blade, and you should not use it when it is not appropriate because you weaken your greatest tool on that day you really do have proof. This video is convincing, but it is not proof.

Neither can we yet say "the fact that". Although I agree with you 100% that 911 was an inside job, we have still not proven this in a Court of Law. We DO have many facts with regard to what happened on that day (like the molten metal). Those ARE facts.

But as of today, we cannot say that it is a fact that 911 was an inside job. That is something we firmly believe, and aim to prove.

the definition of "proof" has changed some years ago

in a lot of countries in the last years.
in this new definition, that video is not only proof, this video is an undeniable fact of truth.

"... a somewhat unfamiliar conception for the average mind." (mp3)
Albert Einstein


Without detriment to what is a very good film, if you change the definition of "proof" so that you include what is "convincing" (what you may find compelling is not what someone else does), then you have also degraded the word "proof".

In fact you are then making a pretence, to wit that things are what you say they are - end of discussion - whereas in fact, you have not "proved" anything at all. All you do is weaken the meaning of the word "proof", and since you mention it what is "an undeniable fact of truth".

That this is so can be seen from the comment below, showing the different definitions of the word "proof". The word is weaker because it becomes clear that we are not talking about the same thing. Your "proof" may not me mine, nor mine yours.

So if it is true, what you say, then I very much regret it.


proof (prf)
1. The evidence or argument that compels the mind to accept an assertion as true.
a. The validation of a proposition by application of specified rules, as of induction or deduction, to assumptions, axioms, and sequentially derived conclusions.
b. A statement or argument used in such a validation.
a. Convincing or persuasive demonstration: was asked for proof of his identity; an employment history that was proof of her dependability.
b. The state of being convinced or persuaded by consideration of evidence.
"Cogito ergo sum"