GOP insider: 9/11 fit White House plan

The attacks of 9/11 fit in well with a White House plan for war against Iraq, says a former speechwriter
for George H.W. Bush in a scathing denunciation of the current Bush administration.

In his book, "Invasion of the Party Snatchers: How the holy rollers and neo-cons destroyed the GOP"
[Sourcebooks, 2007], Victor Gold says the war hawks around Bush were highly motivated to arrange a
pretext for war and drew comparisons to the use of the explosion on the Maine to instigate the Spanish-American
war and President Lyndon Johnson's use of a minor incident in the Gulf of Tonkin to escalate the Vietnam conflict
into full-blown war.
Gold, a Goldwater conservative, does not directly accuse the neo-cons of complicity in the attacks of 9/11, but he leaves the reader
in little doubt about his suspicions.
For more, see my blog post:
If link fails, try

The fact that the US

The fact that the US government does it or not doesn't matter. What matter is that it wasn't the arabs, witch change everything we saw on TV since then. Someone knew that the governement was looking for an excuse, got some peoples who wanted more money and power, make the plan and gave then what they were seeking for.

anyone else

I wonder if the guilt is getting a little too heavy.

maybe some more "insiders" will cleanse themselves, St. Peter isn't going to look kindly on your silence.

Maybe you guys can form a therapy group and talk about your Facist Tendancies

Guilt may serve the cuase of truth,

but any suggestion of happenstance, or a LIHOP "golden opportunity," too good to pass up, avoids too many angles — the puzzle is vast but compellingly interlinked.

When the records destruction at both WTC7 and the Pentagon, all pertinent to the multi-trillion-dollar ongoing fraud investigations, is factored in, there leaves virtually no option for anything but a vast conspiracy reaching deeply into the finance oligarchy.

Risking repeating this too often for some; the 911 coup is an open secret in the corridors of power, but there is a struggle over where things are headed; ergo, numerous limited hangouts: "Target Iran" "Triple Cross" "Fiasco" "State of Denial" "On the Brink" “ Iraq Study Group Report,” to mention just a few, and now "Invasion of the Party Snatchers: How the holy rollers and neo-cons destroyed the GOP."

The scramble is on to undo the damage without blowing the cover up, triggering the biggest constitutional crisis since the Civil War and precipitate a global economic crash.

Any future historian

who writes this latest chapter of historic insanity - if they do not question 9/11, in light of the fact that these wars were planned and ready to roll PRE-9/11, particularly in light of everything known in hindsight, much of which is in the public record, isn't a historian at all, but a writer of Fox News style fiction.

All roads lead to 9/11 as the "casus belli" for everything that ensued in its wake. It's plain as day. In plain sight.

Hint - free falling twin towers, exploding, from the top down..

P.S. Why the hell does everyone think that 9/11 truth revealed will lead to a global meltdown and rioting in the streets?

To the contrary, it will offer the hope of a restoration of confidence, that the US can no longer function as a rogue nation hell bent on unilateral hegemonic domination..

It will offer hope for the beginning of the end of a totally corrupt and evil system.. and that's a good thing.

What we'd be looking at would be a re-correction, and a renewal of confidence, not a total meltdown.. that's a big assumption that everyone makes, based on no information.

9/11 truth revealed, would represent the beginning of a recovery process. Yeah it might be painful, but everything would work out just fine, except for the likes of Bush, Cheney and cabal, and/or those who executed on the evil deed, which those pricks then employed according to plan..and covered up after the fact.
On the 11th day, of every month.

I agree

that 911 Truth revealed will bring overwhelmingly positive changes, and that total meltdown (economic collapse, societal chaos, etc., is unlikely).

That is not to say that there won't be a significant correction that may be painful to many. But necessary.

TRUTH is in the process of transforming mankind into a better and more enlightened version of itself. The dark forces are desperately trying to hold back and control this tide of change. But it is already too late. The light is taking over.

Spread the Truth without fear, and enjoy the ride, folks!!

Former Bush Speechwriter

Former Bush Speechwriter Hints at 9/11 Inside Job
Says Neo-Cons would have created a false flag to justify war had it not been for WTC attack, questions official story
A GOP insider, former Bush 41 speechwriter and close friend of the Bush family writes in his new book that before 9/11, the Neo-Cons in control of the Bush administration were eager to seize upon a manufactured provocation to go to war - just as LBJ had done with the Gulf Of Tonkin in 1965, and questions the official 9/11 story
Gold confirms that war in Iraq was decided upon from day one, and that a fake pretext was readied and anticipated before 9/11 happened. Though Gold still pins the blame on Al-Qaeda, in acknowledging the fact that the Bush administration would have staged a false flag attack anyway had it not been for 9/11, he is one small step away from intimating that the attacks on the WTC and Pentagon were an inside job.

"There would be regime change in Iraq," writes Gold, "All that the Neo-Con war hawks, in the Bush administration and out, needed to bring it about was an excuse to invade. Looking back a half-decade and knowing what we now know, who could doubt that if al Qaeda hadn't obliged the Neo-Cons with 9/11, the Kristolites would have torn a page out of history and, with Rupert Murdoch playing the role of William Randolph Hearst, given us a reprise of the sinking of the Maine?"
For Gold, a lifetime Bush family friend and a GOP darling, to go turncoat and detail how the Neo-Cons were feverishly preparing for a false flag event to justify their pre-planned war, while questioning the official 9/11 story, is a resounding slap in the face to those who claim that 9/11 couldn't have been an inside job because whistleblowers would foil the conspiracy.
It took insiders like E. Howard Hunt nearly 50 years to spill the beans on the fact that Kennedy was killed by the government, and yet we already have a plethora of respected individuals sounding the clarion call about 9/11 being an inside job, and in the very least - as in the case of Victor Gold, slamming the fairy tale that is upheld as the government's official story.

good find

It also begs the question, "What would it take for Left gatekeepers to even consider the possibility of 9/11 being an inside job?"

I mean, there has never been a group in the White House as radicalized as the neocons. They make Nixon look like a hippie. In addition to all of the evidence that indicates 9/11 was an inside job, there is evidence such as Gold's observation. That is, the circumstantial evidence is overwhelming. They wrote about transforming the Middle East for years. They were prepared to invade Iraq and Afghanistan when they stole the 2000 election. The administration is stacked with radicalized hawks, Zionists, and Machiavellian types. And we're supposed to believe that 9/11 was just a happy accident?

Sorry, but that dog don't hunt.

I try to imagine 9/11 happening during any other presidency in history, and it makes no sense. It only makes sense under this presidency.

Even consider the timing, just months after the BBC and Jane's Defense reported the administration had already made plans to invade Afghanistan.

Quick Question

I haven't read the book, so I have a question. The way PrisonPlanet is covering the story:

"in his book Gold also, "Takes pains to point out the holes in the official line (of 9/11) and has some acerbic comments about Israel's peculiar responses."

Was Gold pointing out holes in the official account of 9/11? If so, what exactly did he say?

Or was he talking about holes in the official account of Iraq's wmds?