Planned group chat?
highcard00 Thu, 04/12/2007 - 5:51pm
This came across on MySpace today, sounds like some people are planning a group discussion tonight @ 11pm EST. Anyone who wants to join along, more ideas and voices the merrier, anyway here's the post:
So tonight at 11:00pm eastern time, the truth chat is having a huge gathering, so you should repost this, and then come.
To all Truth Seekers, Light Bringers, and Info Warriors:
http://www.freedom-fight.net/chat
"In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot." ------- Mark Twain
- highcard00's blog
- Login to post comments
highcard00 -
I dropped by for about 30 minutes and it seemed to be nothing more than a dismal rhetorical food fight with some jrefers.
I hope I'm wrong, but what's the point?
I hope that you and yours are well.
The truth shall set us free. Love is the only way forward.
I stuck around for a while after you left and talked to them...
Even shared a few laughs about certain theories. But they were really troubled that I believed that the destruction of the towers was controlled demolition, they asked me specificially what would convince me otherwise... Which I thought was kinda weird but I went along with it, I said visual evidence that directly contradicted the video taken that day that appears to show controlled demolition. One gentleman went at great lengths describing how even though it -appears- to be controlled demolition, that in itself is proof that it is not. Belief in the official story (except for elements of the flight 93 timeframe) was close they said, as if all I had to do was make a religious leap of faith to their beliefs, literally doublethink.
I'm really sorry, but I can't do that. A speculative argument is always beaten by cumulative data in unbiased minds.
Better you than I
LOL
(I have no time for such nonsense online, on the street, yes, but not online)
I always refer to the Towers destruction as explosive demolition and to WTC 7 as a classic, textbook controlled demolition. This helps to avoid some of the rhetorical traps the debunkers try to use, such as "controlled demolitions ALWAYS start at the bottom and the Towers started at the top." (They completely ignore William Rodriguez's account, of course)
All three buildings clearly did not fail due to gravitational collapse as they would've had to violate just about every law of physics for that to be true. Anyone with a basic understanding of physics should immediately realize this after watching WTC 7 and then the Twin Towers be destroyed.
I hope that you and yours are well.
The truth shall set us free. Love is the only way forward.