Sleight of Hand: A timed explosion and the psychology of diversion.

"In addition to manual dexterity, sleight of hand depends on the use of psychology, misdirection and natural choreography in accomplishing a magical effect. Misdirection is perhaps the most important component of the art of sleight of hand. Using misdirection, the skillful magician choreographs every movement in a routine so even the most critical and observant spectators are compelled to look where the magician wants them to. Two types of misdirection are time and movement. Time is simple; by allowing a small amount of time to pass after an action, events are skewed in the viewers mind. Movement is a little more complicated. A phrase often used is "A larger action covers a smaller action." - Wikipedia: "Sleight of Hand"

Example 1: Comment
Indeed, the perpetrators of 9/11 did not want you to see the coordinated and timed explosion set to occur exactly when the 2nd plane hit.
Certainly, fire and damage cannot coordinate explosions...

Example 1:

It is interesting to note that the "pod / missile" theories drew even the eyes of the skeptics away from this extremely strong evidence by focusing our attention elsewhere.

Example 2: Comment
"A larger action covers a smaller action" - Here as the South tower is collapsing - watch the NORTH tower as a huge explosion is coordinated with another diversionary event. Certainly random fire and damage couldn't have coordinated another explosion...

Example 2:

Example 3: Comment
Finally the largest misdirection of all. World Trade Center 7 is dropped from most peoples memories. Why? (From above) "By allowing a small amount of time to pass after an action, events are skewed in the viewers mind." World Trade Center 7 collapsed 7 hours later at 5:20 p.m. in the exact manner of a controlled demolition.

Example 3:

Elements of collapse congruent with controlled demoliton:
1) Squibs on the upper right hand side (See below)
2) Kink or Fault in the top
3) Free fall collapse (6.6. seconds)
4) Collapse into it's own footprint
5) Molten Steel at the bottom (See below)
6) Metallurgic examination showed sulfidation and potassium permanganate.
*Diluted sulfuric acid reacts with KMnO4 (potassium permanganate) to give Mn2O7, which can be explosive.[6][7][8]" -Wikipedia "potassium permanganate)

Thank you and good night.


Molten Steel


Good correlation between events very technologically done. These people who did this were communication experts, to have this in a sequenced events (implosion Thermate). All choreographed for mass media consumption. They did a good job.

They had to have trained for this event where?
Who would Lucky Larry trust to do this?
Who in government could Lucky Larry Trust?
Who in the media would back Larry up and put the control mechism in place for this to succeed ?

Fuck Larry

Larry had no say in this - NONE WHATSOEVER - he was told ahead of time "something was going to occur", just like all of the puppets in the regime. You want to know when Bush first new? Certainly not anytime beforehand. He knew when A1 took off from florida and he was in the air... ANGEL IS NEXT. 9/11 was a coup, but they didnt need to kill the gov't, they just threatened it into acquiesence. Why did bush not fly to dc like he wanted, why did a1 go to offut air force base? The same base where the E4B's are housed. Whats an e4b? The giant 747 white flying pentagons that show up in pics/films from 911 over NY and dc. There he is told what happened, and what he is going to do next, and for the remainder of his term.

Angel is next.

Physics/Science/Mathematics do not lie, only people do.
9/11 was an INSIDE JOB

CattleRustler the Bush lover

If you dont think lucky larry had nothing to do with 9/11 or you eather ignoring the facts our your dis info Bush had nothing to do with 9/11 your falling in the blame Bush Box which will not go anywhere so keep promoting that nonsense. How about this I will get my facts and you get yours and lets compare. (Bush couldnt organize a wet dream)

P.S. Who are the people that threatened the Government? Who is pulling Bush stings I want names Families groups ?

I said

Larry had no "say" in what was happening, I didnt say "he wasnt involved" - huge difference you need to grasp before asailing me with "bush lover" statements. Where I am from thems is fightin' words.

Reread your post, it contradicts itself.

Family names? I'd start with Cheney and work upwards following the money thru the federal reserve into the world banks.

Physics/Science/Mathematics do not lie, only people do.
9/11 was an INSIDE JOB

ya got that right


Post it as a blog if you can

CattleRustler, these are strong statements by you, and interesting ones too. Do you have evidence, or is this just guesswork based on gut feeling? If you have anything resembling evidence, or a fact trail, could you post it as a blog?

It could even be that you have nothing more than strong hunches. How were these formed? Even that sort of account would make for a blog entry that I would want to read, and I presume others too.

It would seem inconcievable

It would seem inconcievable (although not impossible) that Larry would be unaware of his buildings being wired for demolition weeks in advance of the attack. As for the presidential shrub the totally vacuous look on his face sitting in that classroom confirms that he had no raging clue at all.
"Hope doesn't come from calculating whether the good news is winning out over the bad. It's simply a choice to take action."
- Anna Lappe

What about the previous owner?

I also find it hard to imagine Silverstein being out of the loop. My logic tells me that he probably was (and is) very much in the information loop, if not in on the planning stages. For whatever value my logic has.

But Silverstein did not own the place for long. It is conceivable that the previous owner presided over the actual wiring for demolition.

I wonder why we never look into that? In fact, who was the previous owner?

The point that Cattlerustler makes, that even these folks --Silverstein, Bush -- learned of this atrocity only after it was already in progress, puts oddly different possibilities out there.

Cattlerustler seems to be suggesting that Bush himself was told, "Go along with this if you want to stay alive. It is happening right now so get used to it. And do eveything we tell you to do."

I'd like to see his reasoning on that. Is it just blowing smoke or does he have some reason for saying it? Who is the 'we' in that equation? Who is running that show?

Silverstein built WTC 7, Student

He and his partners were the original owners/leaseholders on that building. It was the rest of the WTC complex that they had just leased from the Port Authority.

I have heard that some buildings are pre-wired for demolition at the time of construction to lower the cost when they have to be taken down. As an electrician I find this a little hard to believe as the connections would degrade over the decades of the building's life and would have to be tested and repaired before use. Also, the pre-wiring would be an obstacle to other work done in the utility areas, such as upgrading communication wiring. It might make sense to put in a basic cable infrastructure such as risers in multiple locations as this would be quick and relatively inexpensive.

That said, it is possible that when they built the building in the 1980's they knew they would be taking it down in 20 years and wired it for demolition from the get go.

I'd love to see the original building documents, as would many others.

As much as I avoid the "pull it" comment, I think it is a dead giveaway that Mr. Silverstein knew the building was ready to go on 9/11.

Be well and spread the truth daily.

The truth shall set us free. Love is the only way forward.

He had to know.

The world trade center would be a horrible investment. It was full of asbestos that was going to cost millions to remove, and it was losing the Port Authority money because it cost so much to power it.

Would have been kind of embarassing to have to demolish it the "conventional" way, especially with all that asbestos having to be removed before that.

They probably saved a few bucks that way.


I seem to remember a price tag of some billions -- that's $$billions, maybe 2 or 3 of them -- for removing the asbestos. Can't say where I saw that. Was it 911Mysteries?

@ Student: I should have

(and usually do) preface my posts with a "speculation" clause, when warranted, I guess I should have this time. But thats only regarding who-knew-what-when.

Regarding "Angel Is Next", here is what Bush says on the topic:

I first heard about it from following Webster Tarpley's work. Here's an example:

If you search tarpley's name on google vids you can watch any of his stunning 9/11 talks. I'll pass on the blog at the moment, thanks.

Physics/Science/Mathematics do not lie, only people do.
9/11 was an INSIDE JOB

Yo Rustler

If your criticss here on not up to date with Webster Tarpley, they have a long way to go still on getting to the bottom of 911; or should I say, the top of 911. Because, as you say, Bush was not the head of this organized crime group which carried out the attacks, it goes above him on the real chain of command of power.


Exactly my point, greenback

Physics/Science/Mathematics do not lie, only people do.
9/11 was an INSIDE JOB

"Public myths", Zelikow, etc...

Excellent Article

Poker Players

Poker players can probably get a really good "read" on what exactly the president was thinking.

The bigger queston is:
Why did the secret service not follow standard procedure and remove him?

Most likely answer?
They knew he wasn't a target.

Why did George W. say he saw the first plane hit before he went into the classroom when NO ONE saw the first plane hit untl the following day, when the video was released?

although I don't

necessarily agree with the conclusion, the Ann Arbor 9/11 truth site has that video that talks about these events intelligently.