A 9/11 "Smoking Gun" Hidden In Plain Sight

Source: Oped News

Let's face it, if the 9/11 attacks were "legitimate", they would have been accompanied by "legitimate" statements and claims of responsibility.

You don't pull off the most spectacular "terrorist" attack in history, especially against largely symbolic targets, and then hide.

You don't put yourself through the expense, trouble, risk, etc., of carrying out the most daring "terrorist" attack in world history, only to let a panel of fatuous government apologists tell the world what your ostensible motive was; e.g., "they hate us because of our 'freedom'", or some such puerile nonsense.

Moreover, someone totally committed to the idea of stopping U.S. imperialism/aggression against his people, country, etc., and willing to die to do it, obviously wouldn't have to be tortured into admitting it. I mean, contrary to what the U.S. government would apparently have us believe, an ideologue doing a 9/11 would be different than, say, a greedy person doing in his rich uncle to collect the inheritance money.

Lastly, any group sophisticated and resourceful enough to have pulled off the 9/11 attack, would be sophisticated enough to get their message across, exactly as they wanted it to come across. Perhaps by sending (a few days in advance), an encrypted message, "open on 9/11", to a few dozen newspapers and government agencies in several countries, the UN, the Red Cross, the Vatican, various internet sites, etc., and then, immediately after the attack, have an associate release the encryption key.

Let's face it, the whole point of "terrorism" is to make a point. What good is "terrorism" to the "terrorists" if the "terrorists" don't get to make their point? That would be like robbing a bank, and then giving the money back.

Thus, like many other aspects of the official government conspiracy theory of 9/11, it simply doesn't make sense.

...

Yes, & they wouldn't make statements like this.

"The United States should try to trace the perpetrators of these attacks within itself; the people who are a part of the U.S. system, but are dissenting against it." - Osama Bin-Ladin

http://www.911review.com/articles/usamah/khilafah.html

Notice that his complete statement never made / makes the 'news' reports.

http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/09/16/inv.binladen.denial/

http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2001/09/12/binladen-happy.htm

Of course.

Claim of responsibility:

"At 9:43am on 9/11, "Abu Dhabi television reports it received a call from the Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine, claiming responsibility for crashing two planes into the WTC. However leading officials later deny the claim."

We know that Benjamin Netanyahu was the first to blame bin Laden on US television, immediately after the attacks. We know that A CLEAN BREAK, SECURING THE (ISRAELI) REALM was written for Netanyahu by Wolfowitz, Perle and Feith, who were working for the Israeli government at the time. That plan elaborates on breaking up the Middle East countries who challenge Israeli hegemony.

There were, of course, no Palestinians even accused by the US of being part of 9-11.

48. "Palestinians" were accused of committing the 9/11 attacks by Israeli MOSSAD operatives. One of the arrested MOSSAD agents told the police, “We are Israelis, we are not your problem. Your problems are our problem. Palestinians are the problem.” A phone call to the "Jersey City Police Department ...claimed 'Palestinians' in Arab clothes were seen celebrating the attacks." Was this MOSSAD referring to their own covert agents?

...
70 Disturbing Facts About 9/11

John Doraemi publishes Crimes of the State Blog
http://crimesofthestate.blogspot.com/

johndoraemi --at-- yahoo.com.

See other discussion

Please see the interesting discussion on truth and forgiveness after this same article posted at: http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_joseph_s_070414_a_9_2f11__22smok...