"Heroes" calls a false flag attack on NYC as "being Presidential" in tonight's episode!

For those of you who watch "Heroes" on NBC, I could not believe that they were actually talking about
Nathan Petrelli stealing the Presidential Election and then destroying half of NYC to
accomplish their much larger goal! How killing thousands was perfectly OK for the
greater good...or whatever they perceive that to be.

They called it "being Presidential".

Were they alluding to 9/11 ??

I was almost cheering!

I'd post tonight's Episode link, but it's not available yet. Check http://www.nbc.com/Heroes/

If you watched tonight, did you pick up on that?

You're right

Nickaz, I meant to post about this 2 weeks ago but became lost in my lack of time. I noticed this 2 episodes ago, then 1 episode ago, and last night as well. The show went from being about people with cool powers to major political paradigm.

From what I have seen in the past 3 episodes, this is a DIRECT link to 9/11. You have the "evil" mutants (terrorists), a President who "wins" (steals) the election knowing that a bomb will go off in NYC so that he may "save" the city and lead them down a path they don't want to go (Bush). After the bomb went off in the last episode (after hiro traveled to the future), they blamed the attack on the mutants and began rounding them all up putting them in special camps (FEMA camps). When I first realized this, I was like HOLY CRAP, this is exactly what happened before, during, and after 9/11.

Whoever is writing this show know EXACTLY what they are doing. The premise is as old as time, good vs. evil, except they are relating it to modern day events. I went from liking the show a lot to loving the show.

Fals Flag Warning


There will be a national emergency broadcast tested today. The first of it's kind.

Also, this Thursday, the live nuke response exercise begins to simulate a nuke attack on Indianapolis. I'll be calling in sick, BTW. There will be over 4,000 participants, including the Joint Chiefs of staff and Canada.


Very scary that this episode coincides with this exercise. The power of suggestive marketing is HIGHLY influential.

See this blog entry for more detail:


you got that right.......

just ask the producers of "the Lone Gunman":

FOX TV show depicts a U.S. government plot to crash a
hijacked Boeing into the WTC six months before 9/11!

"The pilot episode, which first aired on March 4, 2001, concerned a terrorist
plot to fly a (remotely) hijacked airplane into the World Trade Center towers."

TV spinoff The Lone Gunmen comes to DVD with its prescient 9/11 episode
"The Lone Gunmen, the Complete Series (Fox) - Back in 2001, when The X-Files was breathing its last prime-time gasp, this oddball spinoff series hit the airwaves for 13 episodes. The three unlikely conspiracy investigators built their own little cult following with the show, still shot in Vancouver after the original fled to sunny California.
The most remarkable episode... aired just a few months before 9/11 with an incredibly prescient plot about terrorists hijacking an airliner and threatening to crash it into the World Trade Center. Except, in this plot, the terrorists were a cabal within the U.S. government itself.
On the episode's commentary track, the creators themselves cannot believe the irony. They recall how, in the immediate hours after the event when it wasn't known who was responsible, they feared their story might have inspired the real terrorists." -Canada.com (03/28/05)





BYERS SNR: What the hell are you doing? Why can't you stay out of this. Leave me buried.

BYERS: What is scenario 12-D?

BYERS: We know it's a war game scenario. That it has to do with airline counter-terrorism. Why is it important enough to kill for.

BYERS SNR: Because it's no longer a game.

BYERS: But if some terrorist group wants to act out this scenario, then why target you for assassination?

BYERS SNR: Depends on who your terrorists are.

BYERS: The men who conceived of it the first place. You're saying our government is planning to commit a terrorist act against a domestic airline?

BYERS SNR: There you go again. Blaming the entire government as usual. In fact, a small faction ...

BYERS: For what possible gain?

BYERS SNR: The Cold War's over, John. But with no clear enemy to stockpile against, the arms market's flat. But bring down a fully loaded 727 into the middle of New York City and you'll find a dozen tin-pot dictators all over the world just clamoring to take responsibility, and begging to be smart-bombed.

BYERS: I can't believe this. This is about increasing arms sales?

BYERS: When?

BYERS SNR: Tonight.

oops, i meant "The Lone

oops, i meant "The Lone Gunmen".

And just ask...

...the producers of Britain's top-rated "MI-5" (referred to as "Spooks" in the UK,).

"Is it art imitating life or life imitating art? That's the question viewers are likely to ask after watching the opening episodes of the fourth season of this British spy drama. Filmed before the 2005 London train bombings but aired after, they focus on an eerily similar string of attacks."

I guess I'm becoming an entertainment coinkydink theorist.

damn, i have to see a clip

damn, i have to see a clip of this. ive only seen Heroes maybe twice and thought it seemed like a pretty good show but sadly its on at the same time as my favorite "propaganda" show "24". though if you saw last season you would know that the producers of that show also know exactly what a false flag is.........

This is clearly inspired by 9/11 Truth

Just like last season's 24.

I don't think anyone here watches Jericho...

But it winds up the in the show that the head of the Dept of Homeland Security was the one behind 25 US cities getting nuked.

Jericho was an inside job.

I talked about the show here once. Someone told me not to watch it because it was "NWO Propaganda". I thought that was funny.

Well, if it's any consolation...

I took your recommendation seriously and plan to check it out when I have some tv watching time. I wouldn't stress about the NWO-believers -- they're very vocal, but they don't represent everyone at 911blogger.

I watch WAY too much TV

So I watch 24, Heroes and Jericho.

And they all have interesting parallels with 9/11 and other "evil government" themes.

24 is a bit heavy handed now, terrorist-wise and all that, plus "Jack's back", and my paranoia kicks in when they say and do some of the things they say and do. So far they have had not one, but TWO, terrorist-exploded nuclear detonations on American soil. (one with several thousand casualties) So that kind of freaks me out because I always wonder if they are planting seeds in the American psyche. (or is it really "just a TV show") And who was that Idiot Congressman who said something like, "People love Jack on '24' and the fact that he tortures terrorists to get information", as a justification for us torturing our so-called enemy combatants. Leave it to (some of) the RepCons to confuse reality with TV as a way of life and to make a point. And I don't remember anyone calling him on his asininity. (but there are good things on there, too, like the first two black presidents (more or less) on TV — now THAT's fantasy (I mean in the sense of it happening anytime soon, not that it shouldn't happen at all, because we are WAY past that need))

But I found the whole "Heroes" thing about "it's a good thing to kill thousands of New Yorkers (can't they get a break?) to accomplish what we need to accomplish" sub-theme a bit odd. Especially with the guy who is running for office going along with it. It just didn't feel right with the way the show has been going. So who knows why they are doing that. I think it's weak writing. And even though it isn't a traditional nuclear bomb that is being used (I don't want to spoil it for anyone who hasn't seen it), AGAIN we have a nuclear event on American soil. (in New York, no less) Down, Paranoia! Down, boy!

Third time's a charm for "Jericho" and their multiple city nuclear events, which, AT THIS POINT, look like "government"-sponsored homeland terror (or rogue elements inside and outside of the U.S. Gubmint), but we don't know exactly what's going on yet. The writing is pretty good (most of the time) so I think there are more plot twists in the wind. I think someone who MIGHT have been a "bad guy" might actually be a "good guy", but I wouldn't bet on it, because they are pretty good at keeping things from the viewers and eeking out the truth to keep people interested, and then throwing in yet another plot twist when you mostly least expect it.

I'll tell ya one thing, though — if "those idiots" pull another 9/11-ish coup on us, and this time it's 'nucular', I'm going to be mighty pissed off.

One of the stronger pieces of evidence for "9/11 being an inside job" and all that, is that we have not had ONE additional "attack" (except for the anthrax) since 9/11 on American soil, even though they STILL have not even come close to minimally protecting thousands of potential targets (which people quit even talking about), even though they created the Department of Homeland Security and threw hundreds of millions of dollars around.

So "they" screwed up by not having additional smaller attacks now and then. Because we KNOW that it is impossible to protect us 100%, and if some bad guy really wanted to get in and do a kamikaze bomb thing (suicide bomber, etc.), there's not one thing they can do to stop him/her, except get some of them, depending on how lucky they are. But we have not had ONE. (not even an attempt — although they did several times proclaim that they found and stopped some terrorists and cells, although ALL of those have proven to be false)

Although we did have the idiot who tried to give himself a hot foot (literally — that is ALL that it would have done) so now we have to take our shoes off when we fly (STILL!!!), and there was the joke/farce/hoax about the supposed "gel and liquid bombs" that was proven to be embarrassingly ridiculous to whatever idiot tried to make that fly (and some nut was on Democracy Now yesterday talking about that type of stuff AGAIN, at this late date), so I don't know if those were coincidental, or really stupid attempts, or maybe they thought the American public would fall for them (and maybe some have).

Now I've irritated myself. I need to go watch TV and mellow out.

Senior 9/11 Bureau Chief, Analyst, Correspondent


9/11 — GET rEVENge! (in a peaceful manner, of course)

I too noticed this...

The past few episodes seemed to have some 9/11 foreshadowing going on. Last week's episode was interesting when they had the president at Ground Zero for the remembrance ceremony for the nuke event.

Here's the link for the Heroes episode #21!!

The scene is about half way with Congressman Nathan Petrelli in his office when his
mother comes in.