Are you a mind-reader now?

Cool.

Although I think you raise a good point. The problem with that technique is they can easily say, "so you're saying that if these people told you to jump off a bridge, you would do it?"

Also, when the Times Herald interviewed me, I cited some individuals, and they wrote it as such...

When asked for proof, he calmly rattles off a long list of like-minded people, and what he called a growing body of "evidence" that the government orchestrated the attacks as a pretext for the global war on terror.

Granted, television interviews are different, but like minded people aren't proof of complicity.

I HIGHLY recommend getting whichever pundit you're talking to, to get away from the topic they were supposed to talk about (ex... Kerry said WTC7 was CD), and once you've done that, start reciting any of the following talking points.

• Mention the families' call for a new investigation.
  
• Mention the families' petition for the declassification of pertinent information regarding the 9/11 attacks.
  
• Mention the families' petition with NIST.
  
• Mention the first responders that are sick and dying as a result of the White House, and Lower-Level Government's actions.
  
• Mention the obstruction of justice by the Administration into investigating the 9/11 attacks.
  
• Mention the number of whistle-blowers that have come forward, and were turned away by the 9/11 Commission.
  
• Mention the 2004 Zogby Poll of NY residents. Mention the 2006 Zogby poll of 70,000 eligible voters. Mention the CBS/NYTimes Poll. Mention the Scripps Howard Poll.
  
• Mention the fact that Eliot Spitzer ignored a petition from the family members, and citizens of these United States to re-open the 9/11 investigation.
  
• Mention the fact that a documentary endorsed by the family members that fought for the creation of the 9/11 Commission was released that calls into question the entire 9/11 Report.
  
• Mention the fact that Philip Zelikow, a man the families insisted on resigning his position as Executive Director of the 9/11 Commission, is a self described expert at creating "public myths", is a good friend of Condoleeza Rice's, was a member of the Bush Transition Team, and recently refused to comment on the fact that he was briefed on the July 10th Meeting between Tenet, Black, & Rice that never made it into the 9/11 Report.
  
• Mention the fact that the 9/11 Commission considered filing criminal charges against NORAD.
  
• Mention the fact that Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton admitted to the fact that they were "set up to fail."
  
• Mention the fact that Max Cleland, a former 9/11 Commissioner, said the commission itself was a "sham."
  
• Mention the fact that the 9/11 Report itself, has become "Exhibit A" because of all of the blatant cover-ups, the blatant omissions, the blatant distortions, and the blatant lies it represents.
  
• Mention how going to war was at the top of this Administration's list upon coming into office, and how they WOULD NOT have been able to do so without 9/11.
  

The list goes on and on... Most importantly, ask ________ when he or she covered ANY of this information.

Listen carefully. The next time you're on TV, remember a few things:

1. Never, ever say something you can't back up, and back up in one sentence.

Tarpley blew this by essentially relying on a fake bin Laden confession angle. Colmes called him on it. There was no back up. Bin Laden may have been involved with 9/11, maybe not -- it really doesn't matter -- but we didn't get that from the interview. We got that Tarpley believes there's an acting troupe of fake bin Ladens running around. Bad approach.

2. Stick with known facts, and facts that people can look up. Prompt them to "google" them.

3. Push the 9/11 Truth vs. 9/11 Lies dichotomy. There would not be a need for a 9/11 truth movement if the government did not tell so many lies about this event.

4. COVER UP, COVER UP, COVER UP. Our job is uncovering the cover up. Whatever you can do to instill doubt in the viewer's mind is a plus.

5. If you're going to talk about controlled demolition, refer to OUR experts: Kevin Ryan, William Rice, Danny Jowenko, etc. Damage to one face of WTC7 would not produce a symmetrical collapse into its footprint. Other steel framed towers have fallen: IN ONE PIECE, OVER ONTO THEIR SIDES. Reiterate that fire cannot account for all of the columns failing simultaneously. Fire can only attack a small number of columns, and has never produced a total global collapse scenario, either before or after 9/11. That makes it highly suspicious.

5. Many witnesses reported explosions, and firefighters told of demolition, "like they were prepared to take down the building. Boom, boom, boom..." Check Youtube and Google video for world trade center explosions and bombs.

We need fast, one liners that can get around the sneering Nazi tactics of Fox et al. Preparation is key.

70 Disturbing Facts About 9/11

John Doraemi publishes Crimes of the State Blog
http://crimesofthestate.blogspot.com/

johndoraemi --at-- yahoo.com.