Dr. David Ray Griffin interviewed on his new book

digg_url = "http://www.digg.com/politics/David_Ray_Griffin_interviewed_on_Electric_Politics_MP3";

Debunking 9/11 Debunking Electric Politics

George Kenney from Electric Politics interviews Dr. David Ray Griffin on his new book Debunking 9/11 Debunking.

Total runtime here of an hour and thirteen minutes:

MP3 (50.2MB) : http://www.electricpolitics.com/media/mp3/EP2007.05.11.mp3

Streaming : http://www.electricpolitics.com/podcast/2007/05/911_truth.html

Excellent Interview

George Kenney is a thoughtfully intelligent interviewer. He's also a former State Department attache. This broadcast, featuring a discussion with David Ray Griffin is one of his best. Over the last couple of years, Kenney has interviewed dozens of movers and shakers in the American military, and in DC political life. He is well regarded in these circles.

In this piece with David Ray Griffin, Kenney begins the interview with an apology to the theologian. It's one that every 911 Truther will understand and appreciate.

This is a very good and highly recommended listen.

Robert Baer is now a Truther!

How did I miss this?

DRG mentions early in this interview that Baer, on Thom Hartmann's radio show, that the evidence surrounding 9/11 points to an inside job!

(Apologies if this is common knowledge here)

Altered reviews?


Were'nt these reviews a bit more detailed before?

John V. Whitbeck, author of The World According to Whitbeck
After reading David Ray Griffin's previous books on the subject, I was over 90% convinced that 9/11 was an inside job. Now, after reading Debunking 9/11 Debunking, I am, I regret to say, 100% convinced.

Howard Zinn
Considering how the 9-ll tragedy has been used by the Bush administration to propel us into immoral wars again and again, I believe that David Ray Griffin's provocative questions about 9-ll deserve to be investigated and addressed.

Together in Truth!

Griffen is so bad at conspiracy thoeries!

I just heard Dr Griffen on CBC radio this morning saying all kinds of rubbish about there being explosives in the twin towers to melt the steel so they would collapse. I'm sure he must be hired by the neo-con administration to draw attention away from convincing evidence of conspiracies.

He said that no building has ever collapsed due to steel melting and that only explosives can cause steel to melt. At first I thought, what a complete nutter. There is so much scope for conspiracy theories related to 9/11. Why would he devote prime air time to talking about something so far-fetched and pointless? For christ-sakes, they hijacked four planes and flew two of them into the twin towers. Is he saying that they needed explosives to make that into a convincing terrorist threat? Aren't there enough questions here about how the hijackers managed to evade the FBI/CIA and hijack four planes to have to invent a story about explosives? The only rational explanation I can come up with (apart from the one that he is insane) is that he is trying to create the idea in the public's mind that people who create conspiracy theories are out of their minds. He's doing a good job at that.

Who are the real conspiracy theorists?

Here for 40 minutes and already making friends!

I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you just need to do some more research -- but I thought I'd point out that you're one of those special people who registers in order to post something negative about something potentially very helpful to 9/11 Truth and very au courant -- in this case, DRG's west coast tour. Kinda like the Rosie-haters, and the people who had a lot to say about the insignificance of the BBC cock-up.