Spreading the Truth

Many websites, such as Digg, don't allow hmtl coding in comments. And it seems that whenever a 9/11 truther posts a piece of information, defenders of the official story try to pretend that your source isn't credible, or that you are not addressing another issue.

So I wrote the following to be able to cut and paste anywhere, even in the many websites which don't allow html. Let's see the conservatives say that 9/11 truthers are "nutty liberals" or liberals say we're "nutty right-wingers". Let's see people say "no real scientists back your claims" or "the military doesn't work that way" or "no one with a legal understanding agrees" or "no congress people agree with you" or "that's anti-semitic" or "that's the devil's work" or "that's just plain nuts". After posting this list, that will be alot harder to do.

Before you can come to an informed decision about 9/11, you should read why the following HIGHLY CREDIBLE people question the government's story about 9/11:

Military leaders: http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/2007/04/military-leaders-question-911.html

Legal scholars:

Scientists :

Members of Congress:

9/11 Commissioners:

Psychiatrists and psychologists:

Prominent liberals:

Prominent conservatives:


Jews and Muslims: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1566566606/104-4302294-7530306?v=glance&n=283155

Haven't heard of all of these credible people? Here's why:


Excellent list. I will

Excellent list. I will definately be using this, thanks.

More sites that come to mind:

ae911truth.org - Achitects & Engineers
v911t.org - Vets
pilotsfor911truth.org - Pilots, etc
stj911.org - Scholars
mujca.net - Religious
911oz.com - Australia
stoplying.ca - Canada

This is great

I'm making my own top 10 "smoking guns" list with over 150 footnotes at the moment. I am definitely going to quote some of your blogs, such as this one.

“We're an empire now, and when we act we create our own reality."