Hero Of 9/11 Inspires Crowd At Franklin Pierce

Source: keenefreepress.com

Sunday, 20 May 2007
By Jack Shimek

William Rodriguez spoke to a crowd of around 150 Friday night at Franklin Pierce College. From his bio posted on http://www.911keymaster.com/:

William Rodriguez, is a native of Puerto Rico, a citizen of the United States, and a resident of the State of New Jersey. On September 11, 2001, and for approximately nineteen years prior thereto, Rodriguez was employed as a maintenance worker at the World Trade Center (WTC) in New York, New York.

On 9/11, Rodriguez single-handedly rescued fifteen (15) persons from the WTC, and as Rodriguez was the only person at the site with the master key to the North Tower stairwells, he bravely led firefighters up the stairwell, unlocking doors as they ascended, thereby aiding in the successful evacuation of unknown hundreds of those who survived. Rodriguez, at great risk to his own life, re-entered the Towers three times after the first, North Tower impact at about 8:46 A.M., and is believed to be the last person to exit the North Tower alive, surviving the building's collapse by diving beneath a fire truck. After receiving medical attention at the WTC site for his injuries, Rodriguez spent the rest of 9/11 aiding as a volunteer in the rescue efforts, and at dawn the following morning, was back at Ground Zero continuing his heroic efforts.

Rodriguez lost his employment of 19 years and his means of earning a living as a direct result of the attacks on the WTC on 9/11. Deeply affected, as one might imagine, by his experiences of 9/11, Rodriguez has, in a variety of capacities and through several different organizations, worked ever since that terrible day to help others who were affected by the atrocities committed. He has continued in these labors, notwithstanding the fact that, due to the loss of his employment, he has been unable to earn a living, and was even homeless for a time.

William Rodriguez's talk was absolutely stirring! He told, in pretty graphic detail what he experienced and saw on that day. Luckily for him, he had called in a half hour late that day or he would have been up on the 106th floor having breakfast with his friends from the building. He pulled injured and trapped people from the B2 basement level where there was an explosion 6 or 7 seconds before the plane hit above. In addition, he had one of only 5 master keys to all the stairwell doors and let the firemen in at each level up to about the 43rd floor. He was helping carry a handicapped man out from the 27th floor and was about to go back in when the building started to go. Police across the street yelled for him to RUN, so he ran and dove under a fire truck where he became buried under debris for 4-1/2 hours before he was rescued.

Casualties were higher than first reported because many undocumented immigrants (Hispanics, usually) worked in the WTC, either in cleaning or kitchen areas (and were in the building early that morning, as always), and companies (that had hired them) didn't want to report them, since they'd get in trouble for having hired them in the first place. He fought for a law to compensate their families, but ran into a brick wall, since they weren't here legally. He threatened to raise a stink and rally thousands of people around the federal building in NYC, so got a deal. If he would give them the names, they'd give them amnesty and a stipend for the families. He went that afternoon to broadcast that over Telemundo and within 2 weeks had a list of all the names.

He has told his story many times, but the mainstream media doesn't pick up on it much here, though he was interviewed on Fox25 out of Boston yesterday and it was pretty solid. He has been covered extensively on Univision and Telemundo, the Spanish TV channels. He has also spoken often overseas, as other countries are very interested in what really happened on 9/11.

Willie, as he likes to be called, was instrumental, with the Jersey Girls, in putting pressure on the administration to get the commission established and instrumental in getting Henry Kissinger off of it (by merely asking him to disclose his client list!). He has also led massive peace marches in NYC with US military joining in.

He gave a stirring closing where he implored us all to get involved in seeking the truth, since this was the pivotal event which led to war and the loss of civil liberties at home.

He admits to financial difficulties because what he does, doesn't actually pay, so he operates on donations. There may actually be some opportunities for him ahead. He does have a DVD out now, which can be purchased on his website.

He, and others, are calling for an international investigation. He doesn't have the answers, but he's determined that the victims' families deserve the truth. He insists on an investigation that is not under the thumb of the Bush administration.

The Student Scholars for 911 Truth (http://sst911.org/), Justin Martell and Mike Jackman, founders, are to be commended for organizing a very informative and successful event. Our own New-Hampshire students have started an international student movement! Another thing to be proud of from our Granite State. They've even got a conservative nemesis at FPC called "Students Against Student Scholars for 911 Truth" - a sure sign they're making waves.

I have a question...

regarding what Willie said about the first explosion. He said that right before the first plane crashed in to the tower, there was an explosion coming from below; what id like to ask anybody who has any knowledge in explosives or CD is, why detonate this first device so early on, i mean, the tower would still stand for another hour after the crash, so what was the purpose of this first explosion? did it weaken the foundations or something? wasn't there more of a risk of having something go wrong with the CD by having the explosions so far apart? why not detonate it at the same time as the rest of the charges that finally brought down the building? I'm just curious, it´s something that i´ve wondered for some time now, i hope somebody can help me understand.

(excuse my english, its not my native language :) )

911 was an Inside Job

lo que creo yo

hi cualcrees--we're a very international movement so welcome! my theory on this is that because several explosions were necessary to complete the demolition, they had to be spaced out so as to not be noticeable to the public at large. The basement explosion was pretty big, so it was timed to coincide with the first airplane strike. That way, everyone would be looking UP, and the process of shock and awe having begun, they would be very easy to manipulate.

You'll notice in one video ( http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-933663323038237308&q=tell+the+t... ) that when the plane hit the south tower, there is an explosion visible happening in the north tower in the impact area, again, I think, timed to go off under cover of the more spectacular plane crash.

because they are difficult to conceal before the actual collapse, these explosions were kept to a minimum, and relatively quiet and unnoticeable (from the outside) thermate cutter charges were at work weakening the thick core columns at the impact zones and elsewhere.

Saludos cordiales,

Verdadero Verdadero


Real Truther a.k.a. Verdadero Verdadero

WTCdemolition.com - Harvard Task Force


Muchas gracias amigo!

I agree, that could very well be the cause, and while we're in the subject, i have another question I'd like to hear your opinion on, but this time regarding wtc7, why do you think they waited so long, (7 hours or so?) to bring down building 7? wouldn't it have been easier to bring it down right after the collapse of the towers? that way, the dust and the "shock and awe" from those buildings would have hidden (partially at least) the CD of WTC7 and made it easier to sell the "official version" of debris and the shock waves from the towers as responsible for the collapse of WTC7. wouldn't?

"911 was an Inside Job"

Perhaps the implosion of WTC-7 was delayed due to malfunction

of the incendiaries/explosives or that a 3rd drone was to hit the building but that part of the operation failed.

another possibility

is that the whole 9/11 operation center was housed in WTC7 and it took them awhile to get out. And maybe it took them awhile to remove sensitive documents (for use later as blackmail). Maybe flight #93 was supposed to hit WTC7, got shot down instead, and it just took them awhile to decide what to do instead.

My fervent wish is that someday someone comes out and confesses! And then we learn the entire story, from soup to nuts.

(I spend a great deal of time in fantasy land. It's nice here!)

I agree

Some individual fires were set inside WTC7 for no apparent reason. They had to destroy the evidence. They couldn't just let the building fall down. The equipment used to control 1 and 2 had to be destroyed completely. Firemen weren't allowed in to put out the fires because they were set on purpose and the destruction had to be complete or at least not traceable.

Not to mention...

WTC 7 housed offices for the SEC, CIA, FBI, and so on. They had to make sure all of their cronies were out as well. As the story goes, no one died in WTC 7 - except for one or two secret service officers I believe.

If intial charges didn't go off as planned, a few hours of work would be needed to check all the charges and/or set new ones, if there was a malfunction. Remember that the FDNY was not in that building. Who would have known that a handful of people were running about in WTC 7 in those few hours??? - 6 or 7 if my estimation is correct?

no drones

Sorry to say but drones do not have pasengers onbord.
The planes did have passengers on them. Photos taken in october of recovery do not prove your point
Also since rodreguze was in the basement supposed ly how did he survive the firey explosion of jet fue as it came down the service elevator shaft. He was not in that area very straight forward.
try explaining why the core collums at the base are still inteact of both WTC south and north.

There's another theory..

You'll notice that this plot and cover-up are actually monumentally incompetent, bungled, and easy to expose once you get some logic working on the problem. It is possible that we were MEANT to figure it out. Bush is to become the new Hitler, and the world reacts by destroying the U.S. and further augmenting the structures of one-world government, so that we can be safe from such monsters.

It's a problem-reaction-solution within a problem-reaction-solution. Even if the truth does go fully mainstream, we are going to have one hell of a time figuring out how to back away from this precipice. NAU is coming, economic collapse is imminent, China is rising and its intentions aren't clear, US democracy/capitalism are totally corrupt and in need of a complete overhaul, police state/surveilance/biometrics...

Big troubles for many years to come. They were probably right, this might be a hundred year war. Just not against terrorists. The people Vs. the "elite" and their robot thugs.

"Peace comes from within. Do not seek it without." - Buddha
"What you do will be insignificant, but it is very important that you do it." - Gandhi
"The Sun never shined on a cause of greater worth." - Thomas Paine

And still another...predictable mass denial

If we were meant to see it, then leaving clues wouldn't be 'bungled' or 'incompetent' at all, but instead part of a well-executed plan.

But in any case, I don't buy the 'it's so obvious it was an inside job, they must have meant for us to see it' argument. I think that's overcomplicating matters. Meaning for us to see it is not the same as not giving a damn whether or not we see it. It's really very simple--false-flag terror, and psy-ops in general, don't necessarily have to go off without a hitch, precisely because they have the effect (as intended) of causing the rational faculties of most people to shut down, such that the perps know that even if they leave many loose threads exposed, they'll likely never wind up being exposed themselves. Then, once the initial trauma has subsided somewhat, with the major media dutifully reinforcing the official story, which crystallized within hours of the events themselves, most of society will a.) continue dutifully swallowing that story and all that's being done in 'response' to it. Others will b.) feel uneasy and begin to turn over questions in their mind, but they pull back from the implications of all the loose threads in the official story--once they are made aware of them--because they dread not only the horrible reality of false-flag terror, but the even deeper horror of not being able to do anything about it--of having to watch as the bastards get away with the original crime and all that follows, while any effort made to expose them is bound to get them painted as 'nutty' by many of their fellow citizens. Better to play along, outwardly, and perhaps even inwardly on some level--limit the talk (and perhaps even their own thoughts) to 'blow back' and 'incompetence'. Such is the typical mentality of the liberal/left 'gatekeeper'. Then there are those like us, who c.) push on regardless, trying to expose the falsity of the official story notwithstanding the monsters who stand astride our path--corporate media as wedded to the official story as the administration itself; fraudulent gatekeeping 'alternative' media which ceaselessly shill for that same official story and heap scorn on all who would cast doubt upon it; and fellow citizens who continue to put their trust in such sources, and are accordingly unwilling to confront either the disturbing implications of all the evidence on our side (because...well, because they'd rather not feel disturbed) or the ridicule and wrath of others, particularly from 'respectable' circles. We're not giving up, of course--but there the obstacles remain.

And thus, the perps remain ensconced and still essentially untouched by 9/11, all the evidence exposing the falsity of the official story notwithstanding. This is not some lucky accident for them, but rather the foreseeable--indeed foreseen (anticipated, for example, in the 'new Pearl Harbor' language of PNAC)--results of a successful psy-op, effects which are still there, ripe for being manipulated to our disadvantage even six years later, ever forestalling our achievment of critical mass. And look at all they've gotten away with in the meantime. Think they care that millions have figured out it was an inside job? Not while millions still haven't, while millions more have but don't seem likely ever to get the courage to come out and say it. And still others who say, 'it's too late to do anything about it now anyway.'

Not that I am without optimism--but much as I'd like to, I don't see that we can yet treat victory as a foregone conclusion. Hardly.

And this notion that those elites looking to set up one-world government want the truth of 9/11 to come to light--I don't buy that either. Neocon militarists and Wall Street internationalists alike don't want the common folk of the world to get a glimpse behind the mask of covert ops and false-flag terror, period--otherwise, they could have easily used their trusty corporate news outlets to expose the truth long ago. Instead, we see the neocons' foes using every means BUT 9/11 truth to undermine them (Abu Ghraib, Katrina, the Plame case, etc.). Whatever faction of elites we're talking about, the target is not the dominant institutions of the U.S., but rather the U.S. domestic population itself. It isn't 'the world' plotting against 'the U.S.', but domestic and foreign ruling elites vs. the common folk, here and elsewhere.


Why didn't they just tell us that the terrorists had parked a van full of explosives in the basement?

Would have stopped many questions
Together in Truth!

saying like does not equate to actual explosions

Saying it was like an explosion does not state it was an explosion. In no way does it correspond with standard methods or materials, nor is there a body of experience in doing that kind of demolitions under those kind of conditions. There is a body of experience in expedient combat demolitions, and there is a body of experience in booby-trap rigging, and there is a body of experience in the demolitions of buildings. There is no group, set of skills, manuals, specialized tools, or any of the other baggage of a body of experience and practice in secretly wiring a building to unexpectedly collapse in a manner superficially similar to a controlled demolitions but leaving little or no evidence of the work having occurred.

What are Rodriguez’s motives for embellishing what happened that morning? My best guess is a desire for fame and fortune especially the former.

And the following ....

then after 9/11 he was proclaimed a national hero honored by the president and congress of the United States. But then like many other people who became well know for their actions that morning his “15 minutes of fame” faded. He was unemployed for three years and was even homeless for a while having to sleep in his car . Then he discovered the “ ‘truth’ movement” or the “ ‘truth’ movement” discovered him and he became well known in the movement but he was just one of many “truthers” of note, his tale of a pre-impact explosion however turned him into one of the movements stars. He went on speaking tours around the world and even met high level government officials in countries such as Venezuela and Malaysia; to millions of “truthers” he is a hero, sure beats being a homeless unemployed ex-janitor sleeping in your car under a bridge.

In a nutshell, you argue that "his “15 minutes of fame” faded" was quickly followed up with three long years of great personal hardship. Then, most likely due to his "desire for fame and fortune", he "discovered the “ ‘truth’ movement” , or vice versa - which he envisioned (or hoped) would become the ideal path towards his ultimate goal of fame and fortune.

So - if fame and fortune was always his main goal....why didn't he simply take the easy route? Just go along for the ride, as a nationally recognized hero of 9/11, and stick with the official version?

Go on all the big-time talk shows. Write a book (with a pro scribe), flog it on TV and the web, detailing his amazing heroic story. It soon becomes a #1 best seller. Then it becomes a major motion picture, bigger than Flight 93 or Stone's flick.

He would have become a huge celebrity and a multimillionaire by now. Mainstream media would eat it all up.

time vrs actual impact

El problema es que él no sabía sobre el plano hasta cerca de cinco minutos después initial impact. Así la explosión era más que aprovisiona de combustible probablemente del avión no un dispositivo explosivo.


I can't believe this guy was a janitor. He's smart, well spoken and informed. It's just another example of good hard working people working several levels below some asshole who thinks Bush is a strong, decisive leader.

As an educator...

I can speak for janitors. They are the eyes and ears of our learning institutions. They know quite a bit.

Remember, he wasn't just a

Remember, he wasn't just a janitor. He was one of the head janitors in the biggest, most important buildings in the world. He had one of only five master keys.

We're AGAINST the Truth!

The Student Scholars for 911 Truth (http://sst911.org/), Justin Martell and Mike Jackman, founders, are to be commended for organizing a very informative and successful event. Our own New-Hampshire students have started an international student movement! Another thing to be proud of from our Granite State. They've even got a conservative nemesis at FPC called "Students Against Student Scholars for 911 Truth" - a sure sign they're making waves.

Student Scholars FOR9/11TRUTH

Students AGAINST Student ScholarsFOR9/11TRUTH

LOL!!! That's a club I want to be a member of. "We're AGAINST the guys who are FOR TRUTH." Idiots. Right in their name. "We're liars!"

"Peace comes from within. Do not seek it without." - Buddha
"What you do will be insignificant, but it is very important that you do it." - Gandhi
"The Sun never shined on a cause of greater worth." - Thomas Paine

Oliver Stone missed an opportunity

to make a docudrama about another living American hero. Willie's story is every bit as interesting and compelling as Ron Kovic's -- not only because of the events of 9/11 but as a result of his tireless efforts reveal the truth of that day to the American people and people of the world. "Hero" hardly covers it -- he is a truly great human being!


Willie for Prez on the Truth ticket!

Nimmo nails it as usual......

Corporate Media Embraces 9/11 Blowback Theory

Kurt Nimmo
Sunday May 20, 2007

Now that Ron Paul has reaffirmed the neocon fantasy version of nine eleven events, stating during the so-called debate earlier this week that we were attacked by “al-Qaeda” and Osama bin Laden, when in fact there is no evidence to validate this fairy tale, the “liberal” corporate media, as represented by CNN’s Roland S. Martin, has decided to give the “blowback” theory legs.

“Granted, Americans were severely damaged by the hijacking of U.S. planes, and it has resulted in a worldwide fight against terror,” writes Martin. “Was it proper for the United States to respond to the attack? Of course! But should we, as a matter of policy, and moral decency, learn to think and comprehend that our actions in one part of the world could very well come back to hurt us, or, as Paul would say, blow back in our face? Absolutely. His real problem wasn’t his analysis, but how it came out of his mouth.”

In fact, the problem was indeed “his analysis,” as it accepts as conclusive the mendacious fairy tale contrived by the neocons. From the obvious demolition of Building Seven, not mentioned in the official “faith-based” 9-11 Omission Report, to the plethora of scientific evidence indicating it was impossible for jets alone to bring down the WTC buildings, and beyond to the glossed over testimony of Norman Mineta implicating Dick Cheney and the highly unlikely NORAD and National Reconnaissance Office exercises and war games coinciding with the events, it should be apparent to a grade school kid there is something rotten with the official version.

And yet both Ron Paul and Roland S. Martin accept it as fact.
Both Paul and Martin tell us it was “proper for the United States to respond to the attack,” even though the government offered no compelling evidence of who might be the culprit.

Indeed, the “realm of speculation” is the only “evidence” we have, and it was offered by a coterie of neocons who have since demonstrated their skill at manufacturing lies and cobbling together fantastic fabrications in order to invade and occupy Iraq, killing nearly a million human beings in the process. It is, to say the least, remarkable Ron Paul would believe such people.

It is also remarkable the so-called truth and patriot movements have not bothered to call Ron Paul out on any of this. It would seem they are so desperate for a presidential candidate, one who plays footsy with the likes of the nine eleven criminal Rudy Giuliani, they have swept aside the glaring incongruities of the “blowback” theory.

But then, I suppose, elections do funny things to the best of us, including the spectacle of having good people once again allow themselves to be so easily played for fools by our rulers.

"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." ~ William Colby, Former Director, CIA


Starting a huge debate, in regards to, "have not bothered to call Ron Paul out..." If I thought that I had to "call him out", I would. I think, however, he's being what's considered "smart." I have, however, commented in most of my Ron Paul postings about how I don't agree with "blowback", etc... in regards to 9/11. To think that our policies around the world haven't pissed a lot of people off would be foolish I think. I'm sure there are plenty of people out there who if they attacked us, would be considered legitimate "blowback." Not in the case of 9/11 though.

It's Not The Crime That Kills You, But The Cover-Up

We've all heard Ron Paul's

We've all heard Ron Paul's statements on 9/11. He's in Matrix of Evil, for Pete's sake!
It would be POLITICAL SUICIDE to say anything other than the official story at this stage in the selection process. You saw how the neo cons reacted when he suggested that blowback was the cause of the attacks, a theory that was been repeated at nausem by the MSM.


I always see him prominently displayed on most respectable sites having to do with truth.

It's Not The Crime That Kills You, But The Cover-Up

same thing i said to Jon, it

same thing i said to Jon, it may be political suicide but what happens when the campaign ends, Hillary or Romney are president and the ball hasnt moved forward? thats all my point is. he has a chance to make some major waves and cause people to think. hes doing that on some level now but not like he could be. so because the neocons jump down his throat he should back down and be more timid? in my opinion that means he should turn it up and really OWN the debate and shape the argument. he could.

"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." ~ William Colby, Former Director, CIA

all valid points but lets

all valid points but lets see if those "smarts" land him in the White House. at the same time imagine if he DID make clear statements about the absurdity of the 9/11 Commission etc. at one of these debates at this point in the campaign. talk about a HUGE impact. i would never claim that blowback doesnt exist and as far as i know, Nimmo doesnt either. thats his point though, that 9/11 clearly isnt a result of blowback. Paul is validating the official story by even engaging in that argument with Giuliani. HE needs to shape the argument and not let scum like Giuliani or whatever hack moderator they get to host the debates shape it. instead he validates theirs. im not bashing Ron Paul though, im just being honest. out of all of the 2 party candidates i want Ron Paul to be the next president. thats not gonna keep me from being realistic about him though, not that you're not.

"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." ~ William Colby, Former Director, CIA

I think Nimmo is wrong

9/11 being an inside job, and 'blowback' can be, and are, BOTH TRUE. There are radicalized Muslims as the result of western policy in the middle east. The number one reason that Muslims are pissed off is the Israel-Palestinian situation and the Western one sided support of Israel. This anger was tapped into in the recruitment of 35,000 Muslims throughout the middle east, but mainly from Saudi Arabia and Egypt, to help the mujahideen fight against the Soviets in Afghanistan 1980-1988. Pakistan was very much a big supporter of this effort because they could utilize radicalized militants in their battle with India over the region of Kashmir. That is why 'al queda' camps basically were Pakistani ISI camps. Then following The first Gulf War, many of the radicalized Muslims, especially from Saudi Arabia, were PISSED OFF by American troops on their holy land (Saudi Arabia, where Mecca and Medina are. They also were very pissed at the collective punishment to Iraqi civilians.
During the 1990s, the terror networks now called al queda weren't just thinking the whole time, "this is all bullshit backstory for a CIA inside job coming up several years later". As the U.S. one-sided support of Israel became more and more brazen in the early to mid-90s, we became more the object of the anger related to the Israel issue. Many people here in America became more angry, including Pat Buchanan and his run for president in 1992, and Ron Paul, who comes from the same school of foreign policy. Now, western intelligence services continued to utilize what is now known as al queda in the mid 90s through directing their anger and providing resources for conflicts such as in the newly independent former Soviet Union countries, and the Balkan conflict. When Bin Laden issued his fatwa in 1996 against the U.S., he may have been entirely truthful. He may have just been responding to the sentiments of the radicalized guys coming out of Saudi Arabia at that point. Remember, the leadership of Saudi Arabia were actually, truly worried about the anger that came from having U.S. bases on their land. That didn't mean that these terror networks weren't useful to western intelligence services. Now they could be the 'bad guy' for the American empire, along with Saddam Hussein. Remember, Bush Sr. announced a new post-Cold War order basically made up with the world behind the U.S. going up against 'rogue states'. Clinton closely followed that same policy. Now they had networks of pissed off Muslims they could use to help label countries as rogue nations. (i.e. Somalia, Sudan, Taliban, etc.). Maybe Osama wasn't sure when he issued the fatwa in 1996 that western intelligence would still work with those same networks as they had in the past, but it would be apparant based on the balkans and other things that we would.
The bottom line is, over the 90s the U.S. DID become enemy #1 of radicalized muslims in Saudi Arabia and Egypt, etc. That was the blowback. That fact was used to recruit them into the terror networks. The militant networks we set up and worked with became useful to the United States, however, as a managed adversary, when in 1979-1988 they were a manged ally (i.e. the mujahideen propaganda film, Rambo III). Having an adversary actually was extremely important for the military industrial complex, which faced an industry crisis with the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1989. It's hard to dupe the public into agreeing to spend so much money when you say your biggest problem is what tribe in Somalia or Sudan or Afghanistan weilds power. Most of the public will say, who really cares? We aren't the world's police, its not worth our money and lives. But if you are able to attach the conflict of what tribe controls some backwater nation to TERRORISM that could strike the West, you get your money, big time. Some time in the mid to late 90s, this strategy was decided upon, and the powers that be (whatever name you want to call them) felt that one big successful terrorist attack on the West would be needed to really make this world order stick. The world order following WWII was the West vs. Communists (U.S.S.R.). That lasted 45 years. Then there was a transition period in the 90s, and then the world order was going to be the West vs. Terrorists. They also wanted this to last decades, which is why they tried calling it the long war from the start. Al queda was a useful asset to really usher in this world order, but a significant event was needed, much in the same way that Hiroshima and Nagasaki not only ended WWII, but ushered in the West vs. Communists world order. And that's where the inside job comes in. And the rest is the nightmare we've been living in ever since.

Yep. It all comes out in the wash.

That must have been the plan with Hiroshima/Nagasaki... Do a live demonstration, then say "Hey, Russia's got one too! We better spend all our money to have more nukes and better countermeasures if we don't want to end up like Japan!!" Sell weapons/secrets to the "enemy", just to convince your own people that there IS an enemy. Big business. Everybody gets fat. (Except 95% if the citizens of course.)

"Peace comes from within. Do not seek it without." - Buddha
"What you do will be insignificant, but it is very important that you do it." - Gandhi
"The Sun never shined on a cause of greater worth." - Thomas Paine

you just made my point for

you just made my point for me and Nimmo by not mentioning 9/11 once in that entire write up except for in the first sentence. no offense dude, but 9/11 wasnt blowback and calling it such only plays right into the true perps hands. im glad there are people out there like Nimmo who call bullshit when it needs to be called. Ron Paul is the best candidate but that shouldnt mean that we should pretend that hes not wrong about 9/11. he is. he may be talking the best talk right now but he is still preserving the myth. blowback is VERY real. 9/11 was NOT blowback. thank you Kurt Nimmo for calling Paul on this while most other "truth movement" folks dont seem to be willing to. al qaeda is real on some level and islamic radicalism is very real as well but both are small fries compared to the true perps of 9/11. playing into the blowback argument only validates their position on 9/11. thats the last thing we need to do is to validate that bullshit theory.

"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." ~ William Colby, Former Director, CIA

inaccyracy surounding building wtc 7


Try looking at the shots of brodway on 91201