911 Debunking article by long established magazine by some of the oldest "debunking experts" around

I have something to contribute that I think people will find interesting and, as far as I can tell, has not previously seen: A wonderful article from the fuddy-duddies at Skeptic Magazine. I had been wondered if they would ever dared to approach the subject of 9/11 truth. Apparently, with the eager help of Popular Mechanics they put together a doozy.

By the way, when I checked earlier today there was no mention of this article or any other article about 9/11 on their website ... I come by this with thanks and much gratitude to the fellow who created the site http://www.factinista.org/

Unfortunately, the poor guy confidently agrees with the article.



I stopped reading ...

I stopped reading when it said that the molten metal that was seen was far more likely to be Aluminium. This is another cleverly written article that glosses over or ignores the real points (e.g. dust analysis) with enough style and apparent knowlege of the science to dupe the uninformed reader.

It's in the last issue.


Also has the cover.

Does anybody read this rag? Should I bother?

70 Disturbing Facts About 9/11

John Doraemi publishes Crimes of the State Blog

johndoraemi --at-- yahoo.com.

Re: Should I bother?

Actually, you are right. These people are morons. The only reason to read this kind of article is if one sometimes gets some masochistic urge to torture one's psyche with reasoning that is so distorted and convoluted it can give one a headache. Sorry for subjecting you to it.

Also, thanks. The reason I couldn't find the reference on the site I was looking at was because I was looking at the site for Skeptical Inquirer Magazine - not Skeptic Magazine.