CNN discussing U.S. Military training of 9/11 Hijackers

oh, the irony

Physics/Science/Mathematics do not lie, only people do.
9/11 was an INSIDE JOB

It's hard to know...

What is disinfo, what is way-off speculation, and what is just leads that were investigated and found to be nothing more then someone with a similiar name or something like that. Then again it's hard to know what is real valuable and accurate information that is being covered-up.

Did they train at US bases? Who knows.

My opinion is that it doesn't really matter at this point. It might matter down the road but relative to a new investigation....

I think the destruction of the World Trade Center complex, the video, the witnesses, the physics....I believe that these things are the only key we need.

Watch WTC 7 fall down in under 7 seconds. It just has not been explained. UNDER 7 Seconds Guliani???

And to have that guy from Pop. Science on the radio telling me they got access to 'sekrit photos' that prove their assertions....but that the public is not able to view these images.....anyway.

Can't Stop 9/11 Fever

distraction as it is irrelevant

Whoever these people were who may or may not have trained at US military bases certainly did not hijack any planes on 9/11. They also did not plant the explosives in the towers I bet. Arrest the real criminals before they kill again!


Real Truther a.k.a. Verdadero Verdadero - Harvard Task Force

NEW---> the real truther repoRT!


Bush briefed on hijacking threat before September 11

President Bush's daily intelligence briefings in the weeks leading up to the September 11 terror attacks included a warning of the possibility that Osama bin Laden's al Qaeda network would attempt to hijack a U.S.-based airliner, senior administration officials said Wednesday.

The evidence is difficult to translate

I know it's a sin to post this URL, but 911myths has a discussion of this particular story:

The government line seems to be that the names from the US army bases were common names and not necessarily the same people as the alleged 9/11 hijackers. When Daniel Hopsicker asked if he could call one of the people in question, to see if there was a case of identity confusion, he was denied access to that individual.

It all sounds much like the BBC "hijackers are still alive" story. The government says, no, they're not alive -- it's just a case of mistaken or stolen identity.

Shouldn't the government find out which is the case? In the 911 Commission Report, such discrepancies are dismissed as proof that the hijackers used forged passports. But does the fact that Ql Qaeda forges passports prove that forged passports were used in this particular instance?