Support 911Blogger


Wreckage from Flight 93 Under Armed Guard?

[GW's comment: This reminds me of the way that the steel from the World Trade Center was tracked with GPS and put under VERY tight security to make sure it got hauled off to China before anyone could test it. What are they hiding?]

PrisonPlanet has the following story from a clip from KOMO 4 News:

Flight 93 Wreckage Under Armed Guard Buried Deep Inside Iron Mountain

KOMO 4 News
Thursday, May 31, 2007

This local news report discusses secret records, files and material that is buried deep underground at a facility called Iron Mountain in Pittsburgh Pennsylvania - including the wreckage of Flight 93 which is now under armed guard.

What gives?

Front page?

why not? "The Central

why not?

"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." ~ William Colby, Former Director, CIA

DIGG ME

Show "No Wreckage At All!" by Inphoman

Isn't a more logical explanation

to the "no Boeing in Shanksville" argument that the Boeing was shot down by a fighter jet, and so the wreckage was widely scattered?

Remember the pictures of widely-scattered debris?

That would be logical if at least ONE person witnessed that

but so far I haven't seen any witnesses describing a big commercial airliner breaking up in mid-air.

--------------------------------------------------------

Focus on the botched crash scene at Shanksville.

why no witnesses?

Accepting your statement (that there are no such witnesses) the question would be why not? In trying to answer that, the first 2 things which come to mind are the altitude at shootdown and the remoteness of the location. The altitude was 30k+ feet, right? I don't think anyone would see a shootdown at that altitude from the ground, especially if they had no reason to already be looking at the plane at that moment. Remoteness is unknown to me; I'd have to study the area, which I haven't done.

Want to figure out 9/11? Ponder the 9/11 "Mineta Stone"

There were dozens of people who claimed to see a plane

Not ONE described it breaking up in mid-air.

In fact:

"It's not true," said Shepley of the persistent rumors. "If it had been shot down, there would have been pieces flying, but it was intact - there was nothing wrong with it." - Philadelphia Daily News (11/18/01)

--------------------------------------------------------

Focus on the botched crash scene at Shanksville.

"Remember the pictures of widely-scattered debris?"

Actually no I don't. Care to share?

--------------------------------------------------------

Focus on the botched crash scene at Shanksville.

"widely scattered"?

The majority of the debris was confined to a 100-yard radius. Is this "widely scattered"?

///A new debris site has been found this morning (Thursday) about 6 miles north of the crater where United Airlines Flight 93 crashed in Somerset County, Pennsylvania. Considering that the majority of the debris at the primary crash site is confined to a 100 yard radius, it was a surprise to investigators when they found the second area.///

http://pittsburgh.about.com/library/weekly/aa091101a.htm

And what about the hitherto unknown debris site six miles north of the crash site?

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&add...

The shootdown of Flight 93 is a limited hangout to distract people. Sorry to say that.

"The shootdown of Flight 93 is a limited hangout to distract"

I whole-heartedly agree!

And all started by this "non-spook" site.

--------------------------------------------------------

Focus on the botched crash scene at Shanksville.

My personal theory...

Flight 93, or whatever plane that actually was, was shot down because something went wrong with the plan. It may have been destined for the White House, Congress, even WTC7. Who knows? But when whatever went wrong--passenger uprising, or something else--the fighter jets that were tracking the planes the whole way to their targets were ordered to shoot it down.

Rather than having to explain why they shot it down, they faked a crash scene in a remote area.

This is very

This is very interesting.

Why is the wreckage from this flight secret?

What is the law that allows it to be kept secret?

Why can't the public see it? Where is AA 77?

Is there any way the public can gain access to this?

Think of all of the other 9/11 evidence held in secret. Where is Atta's suitcase? The passport found in NYC? There must be an "official" justification for keeping this stuff secret. Does anyone know what it is or where we can find it? Is there a legal appraoch to getting it released to the public?

what about the steel from

what about the steel from WTC 1 2 and 7???? You should of put that in your stupid hole in the ground.

We should hire shaggy and scooby to get the flight 93 parts from IRON MOUNTAIN

FOIA request do the work in IRON MOUNTAIN;

WHAT is so damn important ohhhh!!!! evidence proof cant have the stupid dumb asses figure this shit out ABOUT 93

WHO OWNS IRON MOUNTAIN???????????????????????

Who owns this mountain??

Who owns this mountain?? Don't we the taxpayers?

FYI also...these mountain hideaways are where these guys are gonna run when the rest of us are glowing green and eating dead pigeons. Anyone else notice that the guys "in charge" are just getting more and more arrogant? They're showing us stuff right in our faces and taunting us.

Poking their fingers in our chests now and daring us. They wanna box with us. Where's the bell? DING DING

Who owns this mountain?? Don't we the taxpayers?

...and nontaxpayers, too. ;-)

Want to figure out 9/11? Ponder the 9/11 "Mineta Stone"

How about FOIA?

Wouldn't the Freedom of Information Act cover this? The pilotsfor911truth group got the flight data recorder data that way.

everyone is missing something here

Watch the video again. Listen carefully to Nam's comment about 93. Notice her choice of wording.

Want to figure out 9/11? Ponder the 9/11 "Mineta Stone"

i caught it :-) "The Central

i caught it :-)

"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." ~ William Colby, Former Director, CIA

Wasn't Rumsfeld was the

Wasn't Rumsfeld was the originator of the accidental "shot down" slip psy-OP? The plane shot down psy-OP fits the official Arab Hijack cover story perfectly! Your uncritical acceptance of phony 9/11 truth arguments will be used to hang you later on. This is a battle of intelligence. 9/11 wasn't just partially staged, it was completely scripted from start to finish. If you don't realize that you will walk right into the counterintelligence traps.

you may be right

...and my point stands in any case. ;-)

Want to figure out 9/11? Ponder the 9/11 "Mineta Stone"

Dark secrets...

and "if it isn't vital...". So there is some vital reason that 93's wreckage must be kept secret. What a surprise.

I also found it interesting that "companies" have plans to relocate into the mountain in case of "emergency".

------------------
"Peace comes from within. Do not seek it without." - Buddha
"What you do will be insignificant, but it is very important that you do it." - Gandhi
"The Sun never shined on a cause of greater worth." - Thomas Paine

93's wreckage

Why do you assert that there is "wreckage" being kept there?

Want to figure out 9/11? Ponder the 9/11 "Mineta Stone"

This gives me goosebumps

and made me ill to my stomach. It's so much deeper than your wildest imagination! Do you think we could dig a tunnel from the other side? =P

I think a bomb went off and

I think a bomb went off and it blew up in the air.

If you listen to the Air Traffic Recordings they say there is a bomb on board.

It would explain the debris field and lack of substantial debris

See this Cindy Sheehan / Controlled Demolition article?
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/may2007/310507cindysheehan.htm

/////////////////////
911dvds@gmail.com - $1 DVDs shipped - email for info

It would definitely appear something was shot down or

blown up, most likely an aircraft. However, until the evidence is examined by real experts in an open investigation, the "wreckage" cannot be positively asserted to be the remains of flight 93 even though this would seem to be the most likely explanation.

Doubt about evidence is the central feature of the 9/11 production.

Remember the phone calls and radio

communications are disinfo injected after the fact. The plane was shot down, then they injected "bomb" into the disinfo so as to have plausible deniability, if anyone ever examined the wreckage. They have made sure this wont happen. The psyop of 9/11 was partially built on the "heroic passengers that stormed the cockpit..." etc. If it ever came out that the plane didnt crash in tact then they could simply say "well, we have new evidence to believe that the hijackers exploded a bomb on board, after the passengers began to storm the cockpit"

its all transparent bs that they are feeding us

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Physics/Science/Mathematics do not lie, only people do.
9/11 was an INSIDE JOB

I don't get it?

Wouldn't...doesn't ... the government have it's own secret secure underground bunkers to hide the really good stuff? Why would they risk any possible interference by other parties involved in a publicly traded corporation, or being exposed by some local TV news entertainment story? Since when does our gov do things on the cheap (rent space next to Elvis recordings)...or maybe they decided to use the closest underground storage place they could find near Shanksville to save gas money on transportation? Yeah right.
Interesting story, but it doesn't make much sense to me....why would they feed conspiracy theories this way ...unless.....??
What's next - they announce they are hiding the missing black box flight recorders in a chamber under the Pyramids of Giza - but are not going to tell us which pyramid - for reasons of national security?!

"All that is necessary for evil to succeed is for good men to do nothing."
- Edmund Burke, 1729 - 1797

We will cover this in Chapter Three

Chalk up another conflict with the official story.

http://z9.invisionfree.com/Pilots_For_Truth/index.php?showtopic=7074

"Evidence-gathering was halted Saturday afternoon and the pieces of United Airlines Flight 93 that had been recovered were turned over Sunday to the airline, with the exception of the flight data recorder and the voice recorder, which are being held and analyzed by the FBI, according to FBI agent Bill Crowley

archives.cnn.com/2001/US/09/24/inv.pennsylvania.site/index.html

Since it had no more use for it, the FBI turned the airliner debris -- but not the data and voice recorders -- over to United Airlines yesterday. Asked what United will do with the debris, airline spokeswoman Whitney Staley said, "I don't think a decision has been made ... but we're not commenting."

www.post-gazette.com/headlines/20010925scene0925p2.asp "

Pandora's Black Box - Chapter Three (Trailer)
http://www.911blogger.com/node/8979

http://pilotsfor911truth.org
http://forums.pilotsfor911truth.org

The government has been privatized.

...in case you hadn't noticed.
------------------
"Peace comes from within. Do not seek it without." - Buddha
"What you do will be insignificant, but it is very important that you do it." - Gandhi
"The Sun never shined on a cause of greater worth." - Thomas Paine

Yeup - I had considered that

Yeup - I had considered that the gov is also privatizing everything, but I was just wondering if this was possibly such top secret damning evidence to the CIA or DOD or whatever - I would think they would have their own secret hiding places already - that aren't prone to popping up on local TV news. And why keep such evidence around anywhere - wouldn't it be better to destroy it and say it got lost with the emails (or for that matter just "say" it is hidden in Iron Mountain), etc. if it really was a smoking gun?

BTW - my apologies if I may have sounded critical of this post - that was not my intent. Thank you for posting this article - it is very interesting news - I'm just not convinced what it all really means, because it doesn't make a lot of sense, unless the debris is completely legit according to the "official" story and therefore storage of it requires nothing more than a secure location for historical archiving so that it would be available for review by any new truly independent 911 Investigation that might come along one day. (NOT)

In other words - did the big piece of "something" carried under the blue tarp by white collar guys with and without gloves at the Pentagon end up at Iron Mountain too?

"All that is necessary for evil to succeed is for good men to do nothing."
- Edmund Burke, 1729 - 1797

Elvis' records?

I wonder, what important national secrets do Elvis' lyrics contain?

This thing looks like Noah's ark for some apocalyptic nuclear depopulation scenario!... Some businesses have a reserved space there? Very interesting indeed...

How about the planted wreckage and wreckage from the missile

that crashed and formed most of the crater there? I'm pretty sure THAT is the wreckage that is kept secret there.

--------------------------------------------------------

Focus on the botched crash scene at Shanksville.

wreckage?

Why does everyone keep talking about wreckage? The reporter didn't mention any wreckage. This is what I was hinting at earlier. Listen to the story more carefully. The word used was "evidence". (Of course I know that may include wreckage, but it's not the same word.)

Want to figure out 9/11? Ponder the 9/11 "Mineta Stone"

"Charred evidence"

What but wreckage would they keep in secret that was "charred".

--------------------------------------------------------

Focus on the botched crash scene at Shanksville.

I do NOT believe that 100%

I do NOT believe that 100% of 9/11 was scripted.
Maybe 90% was.

Perps were fully aware of a future 911truth movement
and are naturally silent about
"what exactly happened that day".

The perps are feeding us bullshit and combined
with the strange weapons that were, in fact, used,
we wouldn't know the truth if we were reading it
plaintext. We simply wouldn't recognise it
amongst all the crap theories.

Regarding UA93 ... many of you may not know this .... in:

http://u2r2h.blogspot.com/2006/09/who-did-911-drg-calmly-explains.html

DRG tells us that the Canadian NORAD command shot it down.

It just doesn't make sens!

Iron Mountain seems to be the most secret and controled place on earth and they are allowing a "journalist" in so she could sneek at Elvis, Jackson and Sinatra recording. What she saw was bullshit. Just like most journalist she played the role they wanted her to play. I just don't get it. It's more like "Look at us. you truthers. We have the biggest fortress in the world. And we've got the power."

Drummerboy
**********************************************************
You can't hide a lie for long. Truth shall come out.

"Heavily guarded"?

The "charred evidence" from 93 is "heavily guarded" in a vault inside of an already secure facility? They don't even want the Iron Mountain employees with security clearances to see it. That should tell us everything. It's a straight up cover up.