*** 2nd UPDATE! *** Luke Rudkowski and Matt Lepacek Live from Ed and Elaine's Brown house: Feed Begins 2:00 AM, Friday, June 8


Posted: Thursday, June 7, 2007

Another Road Trip

Currently I Luke Rudkowski and Matt lepacek are on route to Ed and Elaine's Brown house reporting for infowars. Please pray for Ed and Elaine Brown, and us ofcourse as we make this journey for truth and justice.

We will be going live from Ed And Elaine's House 2am eastern time with our live video feed, please stay tuned to see as the events unfold.
Luke Rudkowski and Matt lepacek will be spending the night and the upcoming days at the Brown's House, If anything breaks you know where we will be.

Prayers and blessings to Luke, Matt, and the Browns

**** UPDATE:

AFTF (America: Freedom To Fascism) interview with the Browns recorded June 7, 2007, posted on Google Video today June 8, 2007:


**** 2nd UPDATE:

Media reports that Feds Tried to kill Brown - reports that supporter was shot at:


Dear Shorebreak

.........I am glad to see this post.Although it's not related to 9/11, it is relevant . It shows just how much BS us Americans have been fed.
I admire the Browns on their stand, and thank them for bringing light to this . Do you know if Aaron Russo is up to date on this?
P.S. Thanks Luke

I Don't Know

....for certain, but I'm sure that Russo's very aware. At least one representative from "Freedom to Fascism" was in New Hampshire two days ago and was in contact with both Luke and Matt.

I don't know any of them but I try to stay current on their inspiring efforts.

Russo is aware

Aaron called in to AJ during yesterday's broadcast when this was all breaking. Ed Brown called into the Power Hour radio show (Dave Von Kliest's show) this morning, and he will be calling into AJ's show today

Physics/Science/Mathematics do not lie, only people do.
9/11 was an INSIDE JOB

Yesterday's seige a psyop...

...says former lawman, Jack McLamb.

Could a seige against the Brown's home have effects on the 9/11 truth movement? Emphatically, YES.

Please read these two links. I believe that yesterday's seige was a trial run to determine what, if any, response would be forthcoming from Americans. Jack McLamb gives very good reasons why an incident of this type can and will be used against us

McLamb thinks that "they" are looking for an incident, an excuse, anything that can be used to justify THE CLAMPDOWN they so desparately want to impose. Listen to McLamb on Alex's show 20070607.

First, an article from WMUR, Channel 9 in New Hampshire:

Officials: No Raid Planned On Tax Evaders, Supporter Detained

Some select cuts:

"Neighbors spotted heavily armed police near the 110-acre property Thursday morning, but officials said that they were just there to serve a warrant on a dental office owned by the couple in Lebanon."

Heavily armed police that included:

"U.S. Marshal Stephen Monier said that the fire trucks, SWAT tanks and bomb disposal unit that were sent to the Plainsfield property were there only to do surveillance of the area."

OoooooooKay. SWAT tanks????? So, just what iss the difference between law enforcement and the military anymore? But, you might be a threat or a terrorist if you walk dogs.

""A gentleman was walking a dog," Monier said. "Unfortunately, it required U.S. Marshal Service personnel during that encounter to take him into custody."

Failure to obtain proper federal dog permits? Where does a US Marshal derive authority to take someone walking a dog into custody? Where is the individual who was taken into custody? That person was said to have been a guest at the Brown's home.

"Heavily armed agents seized the dental office run by Elaine Brown in Lebanon. Authorities said the show of force there was precautionary."

Were they afraid that a dental office was going to flee or start a shooting war? Were thaey afraid of incendiary Crest flouride bombs? They also like to refer to the Brown's home as a "compound", not a home. It's easier to get Americans to believe that the Brown's are psychos when they live in a "compound" and not in a home.

Former Arizona lawman, Jack McLamb, had this to say:

""What I think it is, they are looking for an event to push us in to a violent confrontation so they can suspend the first amendment and we cannot reach any more people. This may be the event to push towards that war.

We're winning and if they can push us now into starting a war, we lose and they win. If they can't push us into starting a violent revolution at the moment then they lose." Stated McLamb.

McLamb continued "If I were in that position I know that if they came in and killed me, we would win in the freedom movement. They want to push us into martial law and end our growth of waking people up. This could be the way they are trying to shut us down.

I am a warrior, I would like to go clean house and take our country back but I know their plan and I don't want to be a part of their plan to initiate the shut down of the wonderful wake up that is going on in America today. If they kill this family we will have more people with us next week than they can even imagine.

McLamb warned "This could be is a psy op, it is not over until we fire our guns and there is no more first amendment and that is exactly what they want.""

McLamb's comments on Alex's show yesterday were echoed here:

Lawman: Brown Siege May Be Psy Op


"But truthfully, I don't really know. We've had trouble getting a handle on Building No. 7."
~~ Dr. Shyam Sunder - Acting Director Building and Fire Research Laboratory (NIST)

Good Post

That's the reason I posted the story. Whatever goes down in New Hampshire could effect the 9/11 movement and much more.

The nation knows that something is seriously wrong with the big picture. Most simply don't know how to express it, don't understand it, or they don't have time. I used to believe that most people don't care. I followed the "they'd rather watch American Idol or Survivor" belief. I'm beginning to reject that now. They DO care. But they're lost in terms of comprehending what's going on and in believing that they can make a difference.

It's not apathy. It's slumber.

The problem that the globalists are facing is that many are on the verge of waking up. I have coworkers who complain regularly that something is seriously wrong. They think we need to form watchdog groups and advocacy forums for citizens rights. I don't discuss 9/11 with them (for very good reasons) but I do discuss sovereignty, globalization, and imminent threats to our Bill of Rights. They are waking up.

The cabal who controls our government is aware of this and they know that if they don't take action soon, they won't prevent it becoming broad public knowledge. The veil will be lifted and they'll loose the hegemonic economic based of the US if the people act together to remove them. When that happens, everything they've worked for over the last century will be at risk, if not lost.

So they need to act. They're shifting gears from ridicule to attack. They'll work to silence 9/11 Truth, silence IRS protestors, silence NAU critics, and promote fear, danger, hatred, pre-emption, and global integration.

Again, that's why I posted the article. Whether the 9/11 movement understands it or not, we're all part of the same movement - working to prevent the corporate globalists from maintaining the yoke of authority.

I just received the

I just received the following from someone who, just a few short years ago, was the victim of an armed invasion of his home by federal "authorities", not as massive but, not unlike the rehearsal in New Hampshire yesterday.

From Larken Rose:

Dear Subscriber,

The belief in "authority" drastically warps the way most people
view reality. Oddly, people like to think the belief is a
civilizing influence, when the exact opposite is true: the most
heinous evils because generally accepted as legitimate and good
when done by a perceived "authority." Most people are utterly
incapable of viewing the world without their authority-colored
glasses dramatically twisting what they see. The belief in
"government," man-made "law," and "authority" in general, make most
people unable to see the literal truth of what is going on.

For years now the government and the media have been condemning the
evils of "terrorists." Who are they talking about? Well, if you use
the government's definition, a "terrorist" is one who uses
violence, or the threat of violence, to achieve a political end.

As many of you have heard by now, a collection of several vehicles,
apparently including an armed vehicle, filled with heavily armed
state and federal "law enforcement" personnel, was seen yesterday
heading towards the New Hampshire home of Ed and Elaine Brown. As I
understand it, those "authorities" have now laid seige to the
place, and cut the phone lines, but it sounds like there has been
no raid and no arrest as of yet. (Incidentally, I'm just getting
this from various internet posts, so don't expect me to have any
special inside info.) In one newspaper article, one of the "law
enforcement" personnel said that they had no intention whatsoever
of having a violent conflict with the Browns. Yeah, sure. I guess
they brought along the armored vehicle to do some fun off-roading
in their spare time.

Can anyone tell me, with a straight face, that the government is
NOT using violence, or the threat of violence, to achieve a
political end? Mr. and Mrs. Brown did not assault anyone, or rob
anyone, or defraud anyone. Their "sin" was to not pay the federal
terrorists their "protection" money, which (as far as I can tell)
the Browns had good reason to believe they didn't even "legally"

But whether a terrorist passes a "law" before committing his
violence makes no difference to whether his actions are righteous
or justified. Unfortunately, it does make a huge difference to
whether people PERCEIVE the actions as justified. If not for the
belief in "authority," any moron could see that the Browns are now
surrounded by a gang of terrorists. But when the terrorism is
"legal" (whatever that means), the vast majority of people suddenly
see the VICTIM as the bad guy, and the perpetrators as noble "law

There is one up-side to the current thuggery being used against the
Browns: it is happening in the open. Normally the terrorism
perpetrated by American "authorities" is only implied, which helps
people not think of it as terrorism. EVERY demand by government is
backed by the ability and willingness to use force, including
deadly force. Because most people comply long before such a threat
ever becomes blatant, we rarely see the true nature of the beast.
Only when people like the Browns refuse to comply with the veiled
threats dressed up as "requests" do we get to see the NON-veiled
threats, which show the true nature of the American terrorists.

If you want a taste of what lies behind the euphemism of American
"law enforcement," go rent "Waco: Rules of Engagement." These
people are murderers and terrorists. Behind their uniforms and
pretended legitimacy, they are despicable, power-happy, authority-
worshiping fascists, who will not hesitate to injure, torture, or
kill their fellow man if the "government" myth tells them to.

I very much hope that the Browns have a better end result than the
Branch Davidians did. One advantage they have is that a lot more
people are paying attention to what is really going on up there
(though it sounds like the terrorists, who like their sins to be
done in secret, have cut their phone lines).

It was only a few short years ago that I considered myself to be a
supporter of "law enforcement." After a few first-hand experiences
(a lot more tame than what the Browns are going through) showed me
who and what these people really are, I am proud to say that I will
forever be an enemy of the state, as any decent person should be.
You cannot be pro-government and anti-terrorism. The two are one in
the same.


Larken Rose

"But truthfully, I don't really know. We've had trouble getting a handle on Building No. 7."
~~ Dr. Shyam Sunder - Acting Director Building and Fire Research Laboratory (NIST)


Exclusive: Federal Assault On Brown Home Was Aborted
Man fired upon and captured tells story of being ordered to lie to media by FBI and cover up botched raid

Danny Riley, the man who was shot at and arrested after he discovered U.S. Marshals stalking Ed Brown's home, has revealed the amazing truth behind how he was threatened with 15 years in jail by the FBI unless he lied to the media to cover-up the fact that yesterday's events were a planned siege and not merely to serve a warrant as authorities had claimed.

Riley related in a video blog late yesterday how he had unwittingly stumbled across U.S. Marshals preparing to raid the Brown property as he left the house to take Ed Brown's dog for a walk. Riley was confronted by two men in camouflage who fired two shots at him as he attempted to run away, but was then tackled by 12 other armed Marshals who tasered and handcuffed him.

What happened after was carried in our article this morning, but the whole story exposes how the FBI had planned to orchestrate a violent raid on the Brown's property, before aborting the siege and attempting to use Riley, under intimidation that he would be jailed or even killed, as a go-between to sell the cover-story to the media that the authorities were merely serving a warrant.

Riley now fears for his life but has shown tremendous courage in coming forward to lift the lid and expose the lies that the New Hampshire police told the media in downplaying yesterday's events and hiding the fact that they were planning a raid.

Riley was interrogated by two FBI officials who called themselves Phil and Mark, and was threatened with 15 years imprisonment if he told the media that the FBI were involved in the aborted raid on the Brown's property.

Riley was then ordered to lie to the media and tell them that during his morning walk, he had not seen armed U.S. Marshals but plain clothed police officers who were merely serving a warrant for the seizure of the Brown's dental office 10 miles away, and that the officers had simply tackled and not shot at or tasered him after he ran. Riley was told that if he didn't lie to the media he was facing certain prison time or even death.

Riley was then dropped off back at the Brown's home after the media had been allowed to approach the house. In an act of astounding courage, Riley ignored the media as they yelled questions at him and headed straight into the house to tell Ed Brown that the FBI had ordered him to lie.

Riley then emerged from the house and told the authorities what they wanted to hear - that he had relayed the cover story to the media. Riley was then dropped off at a bus station and told by authorities that if he returned to the scene he would either be imprisoned or killed.

Danny Riley is risking his life by telling the truth - that New Hampshire police, led by the FBI, had conducted prior surveillance of the property and were in place about to launch a violent siege against Ed and Elaine Brown before Riley's chance encounter with U.S. Marshals led officials to abort the raid and manufacture a cover-story which they then tried to intimidate Riley into selling to the local media.


"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." ~ William Colby, Former Director, CIA

Is Anyone Surprised?

Nice Post, Chris.

Like I posted earlier, the cabal is desperate. They came close to murdering Riley yesterday in order to cover their assault.

Let's see if anyone in the mainstream has the cajones to cover this.

With regards to Luke, Matt, and the Browns, I hope that they keep their wits about them. This is hardly a skirmish compared to what's coming in the next several years, and probably won't register significantly on the controlled media radar. The cabal has learned how to control the spin and fallout since Waco and Ruby Ridge.

Any significant stand might not be noticed outside the local community and those of us who have enough sense to disagree with corporate controlled government.. Even the local reports would be twisted as if it was O'Reilly's Full Spin Zone.

I admire their position, but I worry for their safety.

i doubt it will be covered

i doubt it will be covered until the Brown's are executed, and when that happens(god forbid) it will be time to blame the victims as far as the MSM is concerned. im very worried as well and dont know how smart it is of Luke and Matt to be there.

"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." ~ William Colby, Former Director, CIA