No conspiracy


No conspiracy

Chico Enterprise-Record

Article Launched:06/12/2007 12:00:00 AM PDT

I am not a propagandist. I have no agenda. I have faithfully reported what I have observed. And I share some of letter writer and 9/11 Truther Paul Ellcessor's exasperation.

Shame on the Fox News Channel for abusing Ellcessor's intellectual peer Rosie O'Donnell over her bold statement, "It's the first time in history that fire has ever melted steel." Fox lowering the bar on rational, scientific discussion is entirely unhelpful.

In typical Truther imposture Ellcessor complains that I do not argue the "merits" of 9/11 "Truth" propaganda before implying that I am blindly obedient or completely naive. Ellcessor's complaint is as ridiculous as Roberts Braden's infamous cavil over the lack of civil discourse preceding his personal attack on Thomas Sowell. Parroting a remarkable sophistry that has become a Truther cliché, Ellcessor attempts to bestow a false glow of merit on Truther assertions by suggesting there is an equivalence between "the official conspiracy theory" and Truther propaganda. This silly argument suggests bin Laden's avowed conspiracy, extensive bragging about the deed, and continuing attack threats comprise merely another "conspiracy theory" no different from 9/11 Truth group gibberish.

I have already read Ellcessor's book suggestions and can report that they are well crafted constructions of misrepresentation, half-truth and outright lie. I won't accuse Ellcessor of conspiracy. My sources indicate he is small potatoes in Truther circles, has no access to the machinations of the inner core, and is probably just another ignorant dupe.

— David Walton, Chico

The archetypal 9/11 Perp apologist recipe:

....100% ad hominem attacks.....

....0% evidence discussion....

that wasnt typical or

that wasnt typical or anything.......

"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." ~ William Colby, Former Director, CIA

Self-important, pseudo-intellectual putz

He needs to give his thesaurus a break. It's embarrassing they even print his stupid letters.
It's been an exchange between him and a 9/11 Truth person over the last few weeks.
If I read that worthless paper I'd know more about what's going on.
I thought about writing a letter and ripping the idiot to shreds, but it's not even worth it.
Plus, the fact that he even used a word like "imposture" is so comical I can't stop laughing long enough,
at him, not with him, like I'm sure most people are doing, to get myself together enough to respond.
What a joke.

Senior 9/11 Bureau Chief, Analyst, Correspondent

9/11 — GET rEVENge! (in a peaceful manner, of course)

Bin Laden denied any

Bin Laden denied any involvement in 9/11 and all sources where he admitted involvement have been proven to be fake.Why doesn,t he know that.Ayman al Zawahiri is a CIA asset who was allowed into America in 1999 to go on an Al Qaeda fund raising tour.Considering he was involved in the 1993 trade centre bombing thats unbelievable isn,t it.Bin Laden died in December 2001 according to high ranking British politician Robin Cook.No evidence of a conspiracy,there is an absolute mountain of evidence you moron.

"proven" / not exactly

"and all sources where [bin Laden] admitted involvement have been proven to be fake"

Muckraker Report has a good deal of info rendering this line of thought something short of "proven."

Too many people bet the farm on specific claims that aren't proven, and could very well be false. This has demolished our credibility over the years and continues to do so.

I've ranted before about how you need to check everything twice and not claim anything that isn't corroborated. It's difficult, admittedly.

Still, this is so far from "proven" that this post shouldn't have been necessary. There's a good chance bin Laden was involved. He did declare war against the United States in 1996.

Accept it. Learn.

70 Disturbing Facts About 9/11

John Doraemi publishes Crimes of the State Blog

johndoraemi --at--