140+ Engineers and Architects Added to PatriotsQuestion911.com
Alan Miller Mon, 06/18/2007 - 1:42am
A new page containing more than 140 Engineers and Architects was added to http://www.PatriotsQuestion911.com on Monday, June 18, 2007. A majority of these new additions are the result of the outstanding work being done by Richard Gage and his colleagues at ae911truth.org.
The direct link to the new page is http://PatriotsQuestion911.com/engineers.html
If you find this information useful, please share it with your friends, family, colleagues, elected representative in government, and people in the media.
Thanks, Alan Miller
- Alan Miller's blog
- Login to post comments
This is great
PatriotsQuestion911 has become one of the fastest ways to make people snap out of it, and change their way of thinking that the 911 Truth Movement is filled with tin foil hatters. My 911 Truth snapshot includes David Ray Griffin, 911 Mysteries, and PatriotsQuestion911. I've had excellent results.
Agreed
One of the best websites to introduce people to 9/11 Truth in my opinion.
Strongly agreed...
... I especially like that he moved military and intelligence officials to the top before politicians. Smart move! Considering their avoidance of any serious action re 9-11, it is hard to view most politicians as patriots, so it was a good idea to move them down the bench. It is is still good to have their statements available for those who still consider them authority figures, along with the 9-11 Commission members.
This site is becoming the best attention grabber, imho...
However, with so many good websites and videos out there (and so few links provided), I am dumbfounded to have found crap like "In Plane Site" promoted there... Why???
The traitors on Patriotsquestion . . .
While the website patriotsquestion911.com lists a lot of interesting and prominent people who challenge the official version of the events of 9/11/01 and appears to be a great effort, unfortunately it also lists several people claiming to advocate the truth of 9/11 who are openly rejected by the vast majority WITHIN the 9/11 Truth Movement. Yet this fact is ignored. The theories advocated by these people have been refuted repeatedly on the Journal of 9/11 Studies in at least 10 different letters and essays.
Why are they featured as "Patriots" on the site? Can you please explain, Alan, why you list these people on your website along with the sincere and legitimate researchers and scientists? I understand that one of them - JF - has even been banned from this site, so why is he featured so prominently on your site?
The primary mode of the cover-up is to inject looney theories to discredit challenges to the official story with one broad stroke.
These people do not belong on ANY of our legitimate 9/11 websites -
DAVID SHAYLER - "missiles surrounded by holograms" destroyed the WTC towers
http://www.enterstageright.com/archive/articles/1006/1006debunking.htm
http://patriotsquestion911.com/# Shayler
MORGAN REYNOLDS - "no Big Boeings crashed" into the WTC towers
http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=911&subpage1=exploding_the_airline...
http://patriotsquestion911.com/#Reynolds
JUDY WOOD - "Star Wars Beam Weapon" destroyed the WTC (her own words!)
http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/StarWarsBeam1.html
http://patriotsquestion911.com/professors.html#Wood
JAMES FETZER - claims that the above people are the "scholars" of 9/11 to over 800 websites via links, ongoing promotional press releases, appearances on major media programs reaching millions, etc.
http://911scholars.org/Scholarsfilechallenges.html
http://patriotsquestion911.com/professors.html#Fetzer
The website Patriotsquestion911.com mentions NONE of this information about these people, meaning that newbies will assume they are important members of the 9/11 Truth Movement. By these people promoting nonsense directly the mainstream media and organizations like NIST, we are discredited by association since they claim to represent the movement.
http://911review.com/denial/bigtent.html
http://911review.com/disinfo/index.html
http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/reynolds/
http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/st911/fetzer.html
http://journalof911studies.com/letters/Wood-JenkinsInterview.pdf
http://journalof911studies.com/letters/LetterAddedtoACriticalReviewofWTC...
Where is Fetzer featured
Where is Fetzer featured prominently on the site? He is given space just like everyone else. The website features all known personalities who question 9/11. Even if Hitler was alive and said 9/11 was an inside job, he should be featured on the site since he is a well known, although unsavory, person. If Hitler believes that humans breathe oxygen would that "theory" be put to rest?
This site is not going to exclude someone because he has been banned from a website. And I really don't think they should be labeled as "traitors".
They have a few senators on there who wouldn't claim to be truthers as well.
He's featured here . .
>>Where is Fetzer featured prominently on the site? He is given space just like everyone else.
Not really. Take a look at this page -
http://patriotsquestion911.com/professors.html
Number 1 is Griffin, and number 2 is Fetzer. It isn't alphabetical! It isn't random.
>>well known, although unsavory
Doesn't make it right to highlight him or feature him at all. This is a man who promotes the hardcore hoaxes and makes it his life's goal to attack Steven Jones at every possible opportunity. I am getting emails of his attacks even as I write this. It never ends. He should not be supported
Agreed, 100% - They are
Agreed, 100% - They are cancerous....
Why are you bitchin' here?
I see that you have addressed yout complaint to Alan in you rant but, have you asked him directly? Just curious.
http://patriotsquestion911.com/#About
Alan Miller
Email: alan.miller@PatriotsQuestion911.com
There are over 540 individuals featured on Alan's site. You express issues with 4 of them, who represent less than 1% of the entire assemblage. I understand your issues and sympathize. However, with more and more "credentialed", and hopefully sane, folks coming out of the closet, trying to eliminate the crazies from all discussion is probably as productive as trying to pick fly shit out of pepper.
Helping people to get over their fear and confront the facts is the hardest part of what we must do. Not everyone will immediately see their entire belief system at risk. And, most of them probably won't ever accept theories about some sort of weird magnetic rays from outer space.
It is unlikely that expending so much energy fretting over the crazies will have any real effect anyway. Maybe it's best to just simply ignore them or just laugh. We don't have to fight them. So we lose a a few to the crazies. They were all meant to find each other somehow.
--
"But truthfully, I don't really know. We've had trouble getting a handle on Building No. 7."
~~ Dr. Shyam Sunder - Acting Director Building and Fire Research Laboratory (NIST)
I thought I had heard it all...
...as productive as trying to pick fly shit out of pepper.
That is most definitely a new one to me!! LOL!!! : D
------------------
"Peace comes from within. Do not seek it without." - Buddha
"What you do will be insignificant, but it is very important that you do it." - Gandhi
"The Sun never shined on a cause of greater worth." - Thomas Paine
A classic COINTELPRO technique is . . .
sowing division. Not an accusation, but an observation.
Victronix has also attacked the coming international citizens tribunal in Vancouver, endorsed by DRG, because they don't take a position on whether explosives or some other device was used to pulverize the tower, but say that either is circumstantial evidence because Al Qaeda could not have done either. I think this is a pragmatic position that can help unite.
Victronix prefers division. She also propagates the mind-numbing, inquiry-suppressing, official-inaction-excusing, defensive meme that the movement will be discredited by speculating about the cause of the pulverization.
"Victronix prefers division.
"Victronix prefers division. She also propagates the mind-numbing, inquiry-suppressing, official-inaction-excusing, defensive meme that the movement will be discredited by speculating about the cause of the pulverization."
Wrong. We will not be discredited by speculating about the cause of the pulverisation, and Victronix is not suggesting this to be the case. In case you hadn't noticed, that's what people have been doing since day one. We WILL, however, be discredited by allowing the work of Wood and Fetzer to be elevated to a status equal to that of serious researchers who rely on empirical evidence. This is cannon fodder for "debunkers" who rely on, among other logical fallacies, guilt by association. They've done it with the pod, hologram and Pentagon missile theories, and they will do it again with this, if they haven't done so already.
Yes, I have contacted him, as have others
>>I see that you have addressed yout complaint to Alan in you rant but, have you asked him directly? Just curious.
Yes, I have. And I have also posted enough times here, in fact, that an editor wrote to me about it. Many have tried to get through to him on this issue and he has not budged. I hope that he will soon as his website is important.
Yes, I have contacted him, as have others
>>I see that you have addressed yout complaint to Alan in you rant but, have you asked him directly? Just curious.
Yes, I have. And I have also posted enough times here, in fact, that an editor wrote to me about it. Many have tried to get through to him on this issue and he has not budged. I hope that he will soon as his website is important.