9/11 War Crimes Tribunal Author on Dynamic Duo Mon. 6/18/07 3-5 pm CT gcnlive.com

I just got this from Alfred Webre, co-author of the 9/11 Independent Prosecutors Act, who will be on Dynamic Duo with me tomorrow (Monday 6/18) 3-5 pm CT, http://gcnlive.com He will be presenting the 9/11 IPA and the proposal for prosecuting it at the Vancouver Conference next weekend: http://v911truth.org
-Kevin Barrett

Kevin - Hi! MEDIA ADVISORY for your program Monday June 16 at 3-5 PM CT. Please distribute. Thanks, Alfred

MEDIA ADVISORY:
http://peaceinspace.blogs.com/911/2007/06/international_l.html

MEDIA ADVISORY: Independent Scientist Leuren Moret and International Lawyer Alfred Webre to call for International Citizen's 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal

International Citizen's 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal

VANCOUVER, B.C. - In order to prosecute the 9/11 perpetrators under the 9/11 Independent Prosecutors Act, Independent Scientist/DU Radiation Expert Leuren Moret and International Lawyer Alfred Webre will call for the establishment of an International Citizen's 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal, in a public announcement to be made at the Vancouver 9/11 Truth Conference on Sunday June 24, 2007.

Alfred Lambremont Webre JD, MEd, an international lawyer and Member of the Pro Tem Committee for the Kuala Lumpur International War Crimes Tribunal to be held in 2008, will make the announcement in an address to the Vancouver 9/11 Truth Conference, on the issue of "The International 9/11 Citizen's War Crimes Tribunal: The 9/11 False Flag Operation as a War Crime under International Law." According to Moret and Webre, 9/11 was a False Flag Operation by an international War Crimes Racketeering Organization, to provide a pretext to engage in Genocidal & Ecocidal Depleted Uranium (DU) bombing of Central Asia (Afghanistan and Iraq) in order to secure vast oil and uranium reserves; to roll out a Terror-based National Security state-system world-wide; and to implement the final stages of a world Depopulation policy.

DATE/TIME OF 9/11 WAR CRIMES TRIBUNAL ANNOUNCEMENT:

Sunday, June 24, 2007 at 6PM PDT @ Main Stage
The Maritime Labour Centre
1880 Triumph St., Vancouver, B.C. V5L 1K3
CANADA

The purpose of the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal is to prosecute the perpetrators of the False Flag Operation of September 11, 2001, under the 9/11 Independent Prosecutors Act for War Crimes, including Genocide, Crimes Against Humanity and Crimes Against Peace (now Aggressive War), as set out in the Nuremberg Principles, the Geneva Conventions, and the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.

The 9/11 Independent Prosecutor Act appoints an Independent Prosecutor under the authority of Article III(3) of the U.S. Constitution to prosecute Treason against the United States of America by U.S. President George W. Bush, U.S. Vice President Richard B. Cheney, U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld and other John and Jane Does for planning and carrying out the acts of treason, as defined in Article III(3) of the U.S. Constitution, by conspiring to carry out, carrying out, and/or causing to be carried out an armed attack upon these United States on September 11, 2001, as part of a False Flag Operation. Article III of the U.S. Constitution provides that, "Sect. 3. Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort...."

The main grounds for concluding that there is prima facie evidence that the named individuals - U.S. President George W. Bush, U.S. Vice President Richard B. Cheney, U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld - abused the power of their office and committed Article III Treason on September 11, 2001 are contained in a Legislative Memorandum to the U.S. Congress accompanying the 9/11 Independent Prosecutor Act. This Legislative Memorandum was co-authored by expert researcher David Ray Griffin, independent scientist Leuren Moret and attorney Alfred Webre.

The facts recited in the Congressional Memorandum constitute prima facie evidence that the named individuals---U.S. President George W. Bush, U.S. Vice President Richard B. Cheney, U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld---and other John and Jane Does are independently and jointly guilty of Treason against these United States under Article III(3) of the U.S. Constitution. For the full Congressional Memorandum, go to:

Congressional Memorandum: Summary of Prima Facie Evidence of Treason
http://peaceinspace.blogs.com/911/2007/04/memorandum_summ.html

A Summary of the threshold of prima facie evidence is as follows.

I. The attacks of 9/11, as portrayed in the official account, could not have succeeded if standard operating procedures between the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and NORAD had been followed. The Pentagon, under the leadership of Donald Rumsfeld, has provided three mutually inconsistent accounts of NORAD's response, which means that at least two of them are false. Moreover, the third account, articulated by the 9/11 Commission, is contradicted by a wide range of facts, including evidence that the FAA had notified NORAD in a timely fashion. There must have been stand-down orders, and these could have come only from the highest levels of the Pentagon and the White House.

II. Overwhelming evidence exists that the collapses of the Twin Towers and Building 7 were instances of controlled demolition, and/or of the application of exotic weapons such as land-based, air-based or possible space-based Directed Energy Weapons (DEW) or HAARP. But al-Qaeda operatives could not have obtained the needed access to the buildings to plant the explosives and would not have ensured that the buildings come straight down. Nor could al-Qaeda operatives have obtained command and control of advanced Directed Energy Weapons, 4th generation mini-nuclear weapons, bunker-busters, or other exotic weapons alternatives such as HAARP that are known to be in the deployment or testing phase in the US Defense arsenal. The controlled demolition and/or Directed Energy Weapons (DEW) or exotic weapons application such as HAARP, therefore, had to be the work of U.S. Government and other insiders. That President Bush was one of those insiders is suggested by the fact that his brother and cousin were principals in the company in charge of WTC security. Complicity at the highest levels of the federal government is also indicated by the removal of evidence (the collapsed steel), which at a crime scene is normally a federal offense. Finally, if the airplane strikes could have occurred only with the consent of the President and the Secretary of Defense (as suggested in the previous point), the coordination of these strikes with the demolition of the buildings - and/or with the use of exotic weapons such as Directed Energy Weapons or HAARP - implies their involvement in the latter as well.

III. Overwhelming evidence also exists for the conclusion that the attack on the Pentagon was an inside job. That the official story could not be true is evident from many facts: Alleged hijacker Hani Hanjour's incompetence; the choice of the Pentagon west wing as the target; the impossibility of a commercial airliner's coming back to Washington undetected and hitting the Pentagon unless permitted; and the lack of physical evidence consistent with an attack by a Boeing 757. That the strike was an inside job is implied by the falsity of the official story, the evidence that the strike was made by a military aircraft, the removal of evidence, and the government's refusal to release videos of the strike. This operation could hardly have been planned without the involvement of Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld.

9/11 & DU at the Pentagon

In April, 2007, Leuren Moret exposed the U.S. military's illegal use of Depleted Uranium (DU) weapons in target practice in Hawaii, in violation of U.S. military environmental regulations. The elevated radiation readings she recorded were carried by ABC-TV news in Hawaii on April 29 & 30, 2007.

Leuren Moret reported similar elevated radiation readings downwind from the Pentagon in Washington, D.C. on September 11, 2001. Two days after 9/11, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) confirmed that the Pentagon crash site rubble was radioactive and that the probable contaminant was Depleted Uranium (DU). The entry and exit holes through the Pentagon crash site were the signature of a kinetic energy penetrator, such as a Cruise missile, and the term "punch-out hole" was written by crash site investigators over the exit hole. This is a military term used for kinetic energy penetrators. Major Doug Rokke, former Director of the Gulf War I DU Cleanup Team, reported that an email from the Pentagon 30 minutes after impact confirmed a Cruise missile hit the Pentagon on 9/11. Recently vast Uranium deposits have been reported in Khazakhstan and Afghanistan. Khazakhstan is expected to out-produce Canada (now the world's top producer) in Uranium production within 12 years. This exposes the economic interests behind the events of 9/11, specifically the unjustified military attack by the U.S. on Afghanistan using 9/11 as a pretext.

IV. Complicity at the highest levels of the federal government is also indicated by President Bush's remaining at the Florida Elementary school after it was evident---given the truth of the official account---that the United States was experiencing a surprise attack. This behavior makes sense only if Bush and his lead Secret Service agent knew that there would be no attack on the school.

V. The complicity of Vice President Cheney in the attack on the Pentagon and the downing of Flight 93 is implied by the testimony of Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta in conjunction with the false claims of the 9/11 Commission, under the guidance of administration insider Philip Zelikow, as to when Cheney went to the Presidential Emergency Operations Center (PEOC) and when he issued the shoot-down authorization.

VI. The conclusion from the evidence that members of the Bush administration orchestrated the attacks of 9/11 is reinforced by the fact that they had some huge projects---prosecuting wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and obtaining funding to accelerate the technological transformation of the military---that would likely be possible only in the event of "a new Pearl Harbor."

The establishment of an International Citizen's 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal is justified, given that official institutions in the U.S. have failed to assign legal accountability for the False Flag Operation of 9/11. Representative John Conyers, Jr., Chairman of the U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary Committee and his senior staff personally reviewed the 9/11 Independent Prosecutor Act and Congressional Memorandum following the 2006 U.S. Mid-term Election and Senior Staff met twice with representatives of the 9/11 Independent Prosecutor Act. The Chairman refused to introduce the Act, despite support for the Act by his Senior Staff. The 9/11 Commission failed to take testimony under oath from Bush and Cheney, and reached fraudulent conclusions.

MEDIA ADVISORY:
http://peaceinspace.blogs.com/911/2007/06/international_l.html

International 9/11 Citizen's War Crimes Tribunal
http://peaceinspace.blogs.com/911/

References:

9/11 Independent Prosecutor Act - Executive Summary
http://peaceinspace.blogs.com/911/2007/04/executive_summa.html

Congressional Memorandum: Summary of Prima Facie Evidence of Treason
http://peaceinspace.blogs.com/911/2007/04/memorandum_summ.html

9/11 Disappearing Explosions - Brasscheck TV (Video)
http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/110.html

Leuren Moret – Bio
http://peaceinspace.blogs.com/nuclear_free_zone/2007/05/leuren_moret_bi.html

Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd - Bio
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Webre

KITV Hawaii - Depleted Uranium Hawaii (2 Mins 33 Seconds)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L94IUSw54pQ

Leuren Moret – Expert Testimony at the Tokyo International Tribunal for War Crimes in Afghanistan
http://peaceinspace.blogs.com/nuclear_free_zone/2007/05/du_depleted_ura.html

DU: Dirty Bombs, Missiles, Bullets by Leuren Moret
http://www.ratical.org/radiation/DU/DU_DBDMDB.html

CONTACT:

Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd
Campaign for Cooperation in Space
Tel: 604-733-8134
Email: peace@peaceinspace.org

Independent 9/11 Citizen's War Crimes Tribunal
http://peaceinspace.blogs.com/911/

# # # # #

URL of this article:

http://peaceinspace.blogs.com/911/2007/06/international_l.html

Looking forward to seeing you in Vancouver Mr. Barrett.

As for the citizen's tribunal, we're ahead of the game. Dr. Griffin got this ball rolling when he suggested it on May 16th after he presented here in Vancouver.

www.v911truth.org

Read the 'Tribunal' -- It's about DEW

Read the 'Tribunal' -

"II. Overwhelming evidence exists that the collapses of the Twin Towers and Building 7 were instances of controlled demolition, and/or of the application of exotic weapons such as land-based, air-based or possible space-based Directed Energy Weapons (DEW). But al-Qaeda operatives could not have obtained the needed access to the buildings to plant the explosives and would not have ensured that the buildings come straight down. Nor could al-Qaeda operatives have obtained command and control of advanced Directed Energy Weapons, Microfusion devices (4th generation mini-nuclear weapons), bunker-busters, or other exotic weapons alternatives that are known to be in the deployment or testing phase in the US Defense arsenal. The controlled demolition and/or Directed Energy Weapons (DEW) or exotic weapons application, therefore, had to be the work of U.S. Government and other insiders. "
http://peaceinspace.blogs.com/911/2007/06/international_l.html

Space weapons are hoaxes. Don't promote this effort. Speak out against it.

Watch the company you keep...

Mr. Barrett. I'm afraid that the people promoting DEW do not have a very high level of credibility. Promoting nonsense claims along with strongly supported claims can only discredit the 9/11 truth movement. Victoria Ashley says it best:

“One purpose of such disinformation is the bundling of bogus and real information to weigh down any serious questioning of the official story in nonsense.

9/11 Disinformation and Misinformation: Definitions and Examples
http://arabesque911.blogspot.com/2007/05/911-disinformation-and-misinfor...

“We're an empire now, and when we act we create our own reality."

Are space weapons a hoax?

Do you mean that the claim that space weapons were used on 9/11 is a hoax? Space weapons themselves are most assuredly not a hoax, at least as a goal and probably a current reality, unless the Air Force is lying and this conference finishing today was just an excuse to play golf:

http://www.spacewarfare.org/

This article says space weapons are only a goal and in the testing stage:

http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2006/03/14/pentagon_eyeing_we...

That doesn't mean they are a "hoax" nor does it necessarily show that these weapons are not already deployed.

This is not an argument for the use of DEW on 9/11. It is a response to the statement that "space weapons are a hoax." It also violates none of the guidelines so down-rating is improper.

Mr. Barrett

Would you, please, clarify all about this space beam stuff before I fall into dispare oooooh! I'll send a S.O.S to the world....

Police- Drummerboy
**********************************************************
You can't hide a lie for long. Truth shall come out.

Refuations

Please read the refutations of the nukes and DEW claims (which Moret & Webre are advocating as equal to all other theories for the destruction of the WTC for the public and press in Vancouver) here -

Were "mini-nukes" used at the World Trade Center?

"Hard Evidence Repudiates the Hypothesis that Mini-Nukes Were Used on the WTC Towers"
(January 16, 2007)
Steven Jones
http://www.journalof911studies.com/letters/a/Hard-Evidence-Rebudiates-th...

Was a "star-wars" beam weapon used at the WTC?

The Overwhelming Implausibility of Using Directed Energy Beams to Demolish the World Trade Center
Dr. Gregory S. Jenkins http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/200702/Implausibility-Directed...

"Scientific Critique of Judy Wood's Paper "The Star Wars Beam Weapon" (January 9, 2007)
James Gourley
http://www.journalof911studies.com/letters/b/scientific-critique-of-judy...

INTERVIEW WITH DR. JUDY WOOD AND DR. GREG JENKINS (May 15, 2007)
Analysis by Greg Jenkins and Arabesque
http://www.journalof911studies.com/letters/Wood-JenkinsInterview.pdf

.

.