The International Citizen's 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal
"The International Citizen's 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal: The 9/11 False Flag Operation as a War Crime under International Law."
by ALFRED LAMBREMONT WEBRE, JD, MEd
9/11 was a False Flag Operation designed to trigger Genocidal & Ecocidal Depleted Uranium (DU) bombing of Central Asia (Afghanistan and Iraq), to roll-out a Terror-based National Security state system world-wide, and to implement the final stages of a world Depopulation policy. In order to prosecute the 9/11 perpetrators under the 9/11 Independent Prosecutors Act, we are calling for the establishment of an International Citizen's 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal to prosecute President George W. Bush, Vice President Richard B. Cheney, Secretary of Defense, Donald H. Rumsfeld and other Jane and John Does for War Crimes under the Geneva Conventions, including Genocide, Crimes Against Humanity and Crimes Against Peace. The International Citizen's 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal would be convened under the jurisdiction of the Kuala Lumpur International War Crimes Tribunal, established in February 2007 as a permanent citizen's Tribunal by The Perdana Global Peace Organization, chaired by Tun Dr. Mahathir bin Mohamad, former Prime Minister of Malaysia, who is the first prominent world leader to take up the DU radiation issue.
To be presented at:
The Vancouver 9/11 Truth Conference
Sunday, June 24, 2007 at 6PM PDT
The Maritime Labour Centre
1880 Triumph St., Vancouver,
B.C. V5L 1K3
CANADA
Full details of the presentaion at
http://peaceinspace.blogs.com/911/2007/06/international_l.html
- adanac's blog
- Login to post comments
So Now Griffin's Signing Onto Star Wars Beam Weapons?
"Overwhelming evidence exists that the collapses of the Twin Towers and Building 7 were instances of controlled demolition, and/or of the application of exotic weapons such as land-based, air-based or possible space-based Directed Energy Weapons (DEW). But al-Qaeda operatives could not have obtained the needed access to the buildings to plant the explosives and would not have ensured that the buildings come straight down. Nor could al-Qaeda operatives have obtained command and control of advanced Directed Energy Weapons, Microfusion devices (4th generation mini-nuclear weapons), bunker-busters, or other exotic weapons alternatives that are known to be in the deployment or testing phase in the US Defense arsenal. The controlled demolition and/or Directed Energy Weapons (DEW) or exotic weapons application, therefore, had to be the work of U.S. Government and other insiders."
How long before he endorses the "no planes" theory?
Immediate thoughts on "peaceinspace.blogs.com" website...
Just looking at the "9/11 Breaking News"...
Not the sort of website I would recommend...
Best wishes
See, the problem is...
The U.S. Government probably REALLY IS developing these types of "non-conventional weapons", and it REALLY IS moving to weaponize outer-space. Were these technologies used on 9/11? ABSOLUTELY NOT. But let's not get fooled into thinking this stuff is just sci-fi, because it isn't.
I read this site yesterday. I would be surprised if Griffin is really supporting any of Woods' or Fetzer's nonsense. Surprised and disappointed.
"OH HO-HO-HO-HO!!! Judy!!"
------------------
"Peace comes from within. Do not seek it without." - Buddha
"What you do will be insignificant, but it is very important that you do it." - Gandhi
"The Sun never shined on a cause of greater worth." - Thomas Paine
Totally agree... It would be good if "Brainster"...
actually sourced where Griffin "supposedly" said this...
Somehow I don't reckon he can !!!
Best wishes
Here's the Source
http://peaceinspace.blogs.com/911/2007/06/international_l.html
"The main grounds for concluding that there is prima facie evidence that the named individuals - U.S. President George W. Bush, U.S. Vice President Richard B. Cheney, U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld - abused the power of their office and committed Article III Treason on September 11, 2001 are contained in a Legislative Memorandum to the U.S. Congress accompanying the 9/11 Independent Prosecutor Act. This Legislative Memorandum was co-authored by expert researcher David Ray Griffin, independent scientist Leuren Moret and attorney Alfred Webre."
The part previously quoted comes from Section II of the Legislative Memorandum.
The linked article is the source
Why give Brainster the satisfaction of providing what is right there?
I think this is a smart move, given the division in this movement over how it was done. It removes the question of how it was done and focuses on the fact that it was done and needs to be explained. Forget whether there is evidence for DEW, micro-nukes, etc. I'm not saying there is. The point is that many people in this movement think there is. Rather than attacking them and worrying about how it will be perceived, it's better to unite with them around the obvious fact that energy was added in some way.
I'm not endorsing this document, as I have not reviewed it carefully. I'm just commenting on the decision to include all the theories.
Wow
I'm surprised to get downrated for agreeing with David Ray Griffin.
We need citoyen(Jew/Christian/Muslim) 911 International tribunal
John A MITCHELL
Herblay FRANCE
bonsoir ,
tthe flowers of our societies will not go against their class. We need a citizen ( Jew / Christian / Muslim ) intervention on this problem. Forming in each country (United States , Canada , United Kingdom , France, Gernany , Russia , China , India , Japon , ... ) groups to promote and international Tribunal for the 911 , Afghanistan , Iraqi , Guantanamera , etc ... murderers. What is the the United Nations waiting to take an initiative on this ?
Let us use the eleventh of each month rendez-vous, to create the pressure groups for this project. Here in France our group “Onze Bouge” met up for the first time in the heart of Paris the 11th of June2007.
http://911blogger.com/node/9276#comment-149805
Yours John
UN is infiltrated.
All the major organizations, The UN, WTO, IMF, World Bank, are run by globalists. These are the same behind the scenes people that brought us 9/11. They are not going to do anything. This is 100%, TOTALLY, COMPLETELY on the backs of the citizens. But you're right, every naiton should form movements to demand justice. And start looking into what your own governments are doing at home. This New World Order crap is coming down all over the globe. Did Sarkosy steal the election over there, or what? I heard he's a "conservative". I can't imagine France electing a "Bush-ite" in the current political climate. Seems fishy.
------------------
"Peace comes from within. Do not seek it without." - Buddha
"What you do will be insignificant, but it is very important that you do it." - Gandhi
"The Sun never shined on a cause of greater worth." - Thomas Paine
Space Beam Hoax to Sink Real Investigations
The International Tribunal is a great tool and now we risk losing it to extreme disinfo of "space weapons." Please speak up against this effort. Each time the most lunatic stuff is promoted to people in powerful positions, we lose those people and we lose the tools. Similar to the hoax submitted as a Request for Correction to NIST -- once they get that in there, the people on the other end have likely turned off to us 100%. That's just human nature and the hoax promoters know how to exploit it.
Wrong
It's done, so get over it. If ths tribunal is such a great tool, why tell people to speak up against it?
There's plenty of common ground -- why throw around the word "disinfo"? Even if unconventional weapons is wrong, and even if it's intentionally wrong, it's out there, and it's nothing to be ashamed of. If you think the towers were pulverized another way, tell that to people.
It's not us that has the explaining to do, so quit acting like those who question 9/11 are a minority on the defensive. That's not true.
And why do you excuse people in powerful positions from responding because exotic weapons are included? It's no excuse. They have plenty of evidence that the buildings were pulverized by added energy, whether from explosives or not. THEY have the explaining to do, and can't hide behind mockery.
The shallower thinkers among you may take this as an argument in favor of DEW or mini-nukes. It's not. It's a pragmatic argument, based on basic agreement that the towers did not collapse but were pulverized. The shills won't like that, because division is their game.