FOX attacks Rosie and 9/11 Truthers

Michelle Malkin said we wear tin foil Hats. Trys to Kill/Weaken 9/11 Truth Movement

Remember, it's a "3-D study" or a "simulation"....

.....ooh, ooh (fake shudder).....not a "cartoon".....

I wonder if Disney is having trouble finding state-of-the-art animators now that they have to compete with the military-industrial-complex for employees....

These apologists for the OCT at Faux just get more and more laughable....unintentional self-satire......I confess, they're a guilty pleasure of mine....can't wait for the next installment...

Why doesn't Malkin go on the Thom Hartmann show (for the debate he wants) an represent for the OCT, if it's so authoritative?..... I'm not holding my breath.....

Reason Prevail?????

.....Let's rephrase Fire can melt steel. Fire can weaken steel. In the bogus computer simulation from Purdue answers to these key questions are left out.
#1 What reason did your computer give for the thousands of tons of concrete to be pulverized?
#2 What caused the buildings to fall at close to freefall speed?
# 3 When can we see you computer simulation on the collapse of building #7? ( This should require less effort because it was'nt hit by a plane, and jet fuel is'nt an issue.
#4 What is your reason for the pools of molten steel under all three towers? (This was proven by eyewitness accounts , and thermal sat. images?
#5 Why do you run from public debate of our experts, such as Dr. Ray Griffin, Dr. Steven Jones, Kevin Ryan, and all the other experts we have?
Let's all send Malkin some chapstick, and a set of knee pads. Nothing like kissing ass for job advancement.

In addition...

Fiction: Fire alone can collapse a steel-framed building.

Fiction: Jet grade fuel burns hot enough to weaken steel.

Fiction: 1 million tons of steel and concrete can collapse on itself at free-fall speed.

Fiction: The subsequent War on Terror and loss of our freedoms has made the world safer.

Fact: 9-11 was an assault on world consciousness designed to create fear and mistrust.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Spread the word! Many hands make light work! EMA: educate, motivate, activate.
Improve your activist toolkit and get your free RCFPs here

New "GOVERNMENT" findings...

Like we should trust the Government.

Show "New York Times Hit Piece" by gothamite
Show "Dupe" by gothamite


10'000 gallons of jet fuel turned into "basically a massive liquid lava flow", michelle tells us!
ha! yea, that can easily do what would require 'over 2 tons of explosives per floor' (as we learned in that recent 'paper' )
massive liquid lava flow! hmmmmm

We should look on the bright side . . .

At least they're calling us by our true name: 9/11 truthers (as opposed to 9/11 conspiracy theorists).

It's progress, though not much.

Sent email to Michelle Malkin...


"9/11 Truth is gaining publicity because of you, thanks.

Focus on this?

Truth Jukebox - Music & Commentary

Don't miss Hugh Downs Drug War Expose on Track #1 here:

Debunking 9/11 Debunking by DRG
Checkout the reviews/ranks on Amazon.

Yellow journalism is so easy to expose these days.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Spread the word! Many hands make light work! EMA: educate, motivate, activate.
Improve your activist toolkit and get your free RCFPs here

I sent the following:


WTC7 - Fires have never dropped a building into its own footprint at almost free fall speed. This building wasn't completely engulfed in flames, yet it dropped straight down without any hindrance from lower floors. A concrete reinforced STEEL Building with plenty of fireproofing...dropped at almost free fall speed.

What about that fact does not deserve more scrutiny by our investigative journalists? Additionally, never in the history of our world has a concrete reinforced steel skyscraper collapsed in such a manner without a demolition team. Additionally, the probability that 3 concrete reinforced steel skyscrapers would come down at that speed within 9 hours of one another is most likely impossible.

You might be able to pull the wool over the eyes of the TV Zombies out there but America is waking up and individuals such as yourself who claim to be journalists will be out a job for having lied to the American people so grossly.

Be an independent journalist and a true patriot. Maybe you should look up what a "patriot" really is before you say you are one.

Defend our constitution.

Don't sell out to the Corporations.


For the record, and we should be clear...

WTC 1 and 2 were NOT "Concrete reinforced steel skyscrapers". There are such things as Steel reinforced concrete structures, but wtc 1 and 2 were NEITHER of these things. WTC 1 and 2 were FULLY steel structures, no masonry whatsoever was load-bearing as it pertained to structural integrity of 1 and 2. This is a very important point and it must not be confused. The only concrete used in the towers was the special light weight mix that was poured in the steel floor pans, to form the floors of the towers. The concrete and even the steel floor pans themselves were not vertical load-bearing items. The floor pan assemblies did contribute to lateral integrity aspects of the structure, however.

I just think we need to be careful how things are worded.

Physics/Science/Mathematics do not lie, only people do.
9/11 was an INSIDE JOB

For the record

Thanks Cattlerustler- You made a very essential point. Facts are important in this business of changing opinion.

Didn't know that...

So all the concrete dust was from only the floor pours? and the Elevator shafts? What were they composed of? Sorry for my ignorance...nonetheless, Michelle can figure that out when/if she looks into it herself. And...Thanks for the correx.

One more question, would this "light mix" concrete pulverize / crush more simply than heavy?

There was also hundreds of tons of dryrock wall (gypsum)

type "fire-resistant" plasterboard. I would expect this to "powderize" even easier than the lightweight concrete flooring.

This was the main walling for the stairwells, interior and perimeter walls backing on the the exterior columns.

Best wishes

I sent a 2nd letter

I sent a 2nd letter to Michelle Malkin with your correction quoted, for the record.

Thank You for taking the time to correct me and others who might have misunderstood.

What about WTC7?

Since we are here...discussing these structures in this you know about WTC7? I am just trying to be clear about these things. Was WTC7 a concrete reinforced structure? or just a steel beam structure?

WTC7 was a structural steel structure...

No reinforced concrete there either...

I remember reading (don't have the source at the moment) that it was incredibly strong in design and construction.


yep, 7 was a...

...fully steel framed building as well, altho iirc the outter walls were masonry and the floors were concrete slab, but like the towers these masonry aspects were not load-bearing in relation to the building's structural integrity.

Speaking of 7 and steel, and the integrity of the building, watch this short video:

fire? ha! pffft!

Physics/Science/Mathematics do not lie, only people do.
9/11 was an INSIDE JOB

WTC7 Outer Walls were Slim Steel Sheets...

covered in a brown colored cladding material...

Can see in this picture (click to enlarge), have more if needed...

Free Image Hosting at

Best wishes

That's one of the pics that shows a column cut by explosives

That's what it looks like to me anyway...

Scroll down to "medium's" post for more info on these pics...

"If I had just paid $20 million for the NIST report, I'd be asking for a refund!"

-Dr. Frank Greening

Nice one stallion4... I totally confer...

It's pictures like this that are giving NIST the migrane of the century :-))

Their so called experts having to sub-contract to A.R.A after 5+ years have their work cut-out to concoct an explanation that fits all evidence out there (sweat or be honest)...

Best wishes dude, good to see ya around :-)

Here's a great picture of the outer steel walling of WTC7...

with cladding on and off, along with some "cleanly" cut steel beams...

(Click to enlarge)

Free Image Hosting at

Best wishes

IMPORTANT.... Just realized...

That the above image had been mirrored (not by me) was in the WTC Transit Police Picture Sets (disk2)...

It makes sense when corrected (gap to US Post Office, was no such gap next to Verizon), plus you can now read what's on the back of the workers vest.

It was this pic from 13-Sep-2001 that made me realize (notice burnt out van removed).

Free Image Hosting at


Below is "corrected image" - zoom in to rubble pile, near line of four open windows to see what looks like two "hot spots"

Free Image Hosting at


That's like removing a thorn from my finger, something never quite sat right with that picture...

Why it was mirrored is a mystery, could it be the angles of the steel "cuts"....

Just glad it's now corrected...

Best wishes

OK You Guys...I get it fully now.

Sorry I sounded so ignorant and kept asking questions but overall it will help others others who might have described the structures incorrectly. So, much appreciated! By the way, great photos!

no need for apologies

9/11 research is a massive undertaking, and some of us have been at it for years, so no worries. We all help each other learn the facts, and how to steer clear of the disinfo and lies that surround us, like a plague. And you emailed that lying skank Malkin, to set her straight, even if the terminology was a bit off you still pwnd her, so you get kudos in my book :)

Thanks for posting those pics above guys.

Physics/Science/Mathematics do not lie, only people do.
9/11 was an INSIDE JOB

Video Solo Piano Music?

Wim Mertens?, Ludovico Einaudi?, Yann Tiersen?

7 was a fortress built over a power generating station.

7man, stayreal, 911Veritas...all good work

and cheers! :)

Physics/Science/Mathematics do not lie, only people do.
9/11 was an INSIDE JOB

Malkin is so sad. she wants

Malkin is so sad. she wants to be accepted so bad.

"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." ~ William Colby, Former Director, CIA

Michelle Malkin was a 9/11 Truther before she sold out

Send that traitorous BIYATCH a link to this thread...

"If I had just paid $20 million for the NIST report, I'd be asking for a refund!"

-Dr. Frank Greening