New 9/11 Study Has Direct Links To Government, Pentagon Black Ops: "Independent" study financed by Feds


New 9/11 Study Has Direct Links To Government, Pentagon Black Ops
"Independent" study financed by Feds

Steve Watson
Prison Planet
Friday, June 22, 2007

A newly released Purdue University animation showing how fire caused the collapse of the World Trade Center towers on 9/11 claims to be independent but in reality has been federally funded and was conducted by individuals with direct links to the Pentagon and the White House.

Earlier this week we covered the news that the new study roughly correlates with the findings of the 2005 National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) report and supports the official line that the airplanes stripped away crucial fireproofing material and that the weakened towers collapsed under their own weight.

While the New York Times today lauds the study as "a counterpoint to the conspiracy theories promulgated by such outspoken figures as Rosie O’Donnell", has actually done some research into the origins of the study.

In addition to the inerrant flaws and conflicts we pointed out in our previous article, it has now come to light that the so called "independent" structural engineers behind the study are anything but.

The Study was funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF), a federal agency created by Congress in 1950 "to promote the progress of science; to advance the national health, prosperity, and welfare; to secure the national defense…".

The board of the NSF was appointed by George W. Bush and confirmed by the United States Senate. Its director, Dr. Arden L. Bement Jr, has worked for the Department of defense, where he was under secretary for research and engineering, and DARPA (the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency), which is responsible for the development of new technology for use by the military and famed for its black op projects and offshoot offices.

Last year the Bush Administration doubled the NSF's budget to $6.02 billion.

At the time Arden L. Bement, Jr. stated:

"This is a great day for NSF, and that means it's a great day for the nation, there has been a lot of rhetoric about doubling the NSF budget, but now the Administration is behind it. The FY 2007 Budget Request is the first installment. We are grateful to the Administration for its recognition and leadership,"

In addition it turns out that structural engineer Mete Sozen, the lead investigator in the Purdue study, was also on the American Society of Civil Engineers research team that confirmed the government's story about the OKC bombing in 1995, despite the huge amounts of inconsistencies and conflicting testimony.


From the ASCE web site

Mete A. Sozen, Ph.D., S.E.
Kettlehut Distinguished Professor of Structural Engineering, Purdue University
Specialty: Behavior of reinforced-concrete structures

Dr. Sozen is currently the Kettlehut Distinguished Professor of Structural Engineering at Purdue University in West Lafayette, Ind. Prior to joining Purdue in 1994, Dr. Sozen was a professor of civil engineering at the University of Illinois for over 35 years. Dr. Sozen also served on the ASCE team that studied the Murrah Federal Office Building collapse.

So while it claims to be independent the study was in fact funded by the government and carried out by long time government hired hands. The study clearly set out not to attempt to discover anything new but to prove the preconceived official fire theory.

Again this underscores the fact that a truly independent investigation into 9/11 is the only way the mountains of evidence pointing towards a controlled demolition will even be considered.

Great Blog - That is complimented by Kevin Ryan's

most excellent blog...

Looking for Truth in Credentials: The WTC “Experts”


Another must see presentation is Kevin Ryan's New Standard of Deception ~ NIST & FEMA WTC Report Flaws Exposed

Google Video :


Many thanks and best wishes

Kevin Ryan's Masterwork

Kevin Ryan's presentation is masterful in it's dismemberment of the NIST report. He is going to receive one of the first Medals of Freedom after we take back our nation from the hijackers.

Aside, one of my arguments against fire destroying the WTC towers which is very successful is that I point out that each jet carried between 5000 and 10000 gallons of kerosene, then subtract the amount that burned off in the initial fire ball, at least half if not more. Each tower amounted to over 4,400,000 square feet of office space and over 400,000 tons of mega-steel infrastructure which if laid out in square footage would stretch for miles and miles. I ask people, if you wanted to put the thinnest coat of paint over such a mass how much paint would you need? No one ever has the answer. But it's a simple formula: 1 gallon of paint will cover 300 sq ft. At that rate you would need about 15,000 gallons just to cover the floor space and that's forgetting about the walls and ceilings, to cover the miles steel infrastructure you would need close to a hundred thousand gallons of paint. Given the speed at which the fuel would burn off it would also be quite impossible for the fuel to stay un-ignited long enough to cover hardly any of the towers' floor space or steel infrastructure. It's just absurd to think that the fuel was sufficient to have any serious effect other than igniting office fires. And office fires just don't burn hot enough to even weaken steel.

To many here it is a no brainer. I'm just sharing one of my ways of convincing people to recognize the absurdity of fires collapsing mega-steel skyscrapers.

I like to say

"freefall trumps all", which some of you may have seen me say here and there in various threads. Its a simple statement and it defeats any and all arguments, reasons, lies, misinfos, disinfos, etc etc etc adnauseum. Even if one were to accept everything and anything the liars, debunkers, and oct pushers say to be true, like "norad was lost that day" and "fire can sufficiently weaken structural steel" and yes lets even allow "jet fuel fire fire melts steel", even if ALL of these things were true, no one, and I mean absolutely no one, can explain the near freefall speeds at which the towers fell. Even if the planes cut thru the buildings like a laser beam, and lets say the impacted floors completely vanished, and the upper portions began to fall immediately, the buildings, even if they could fully collapse, would not hit the ground in 10 seconds - it is a physical impossibility. We cannot violate the laws of physics for a second, or a minute, or an hour, or a day in september.

freefall trumps all.

Physics/Science/Mathematics do not lie, only people do.
9/11 was an INSIDE JOB


I don't care what temp the black smoke fires were... let them be 4000F. Whatever. It's irrelevant. The buildings would not disintegrate from the top down at virtual free fall.

Jumbo-Jets Can Not Demolish Skyscrapers.

The Gravity Hole

Freefall trumps all, enough said. Knowing that, I scan the propaganda matrix in search of television programs on the Science Channel or others which will try and state that in rare cases the earth experiences phenomenon which cause the Laws of Physics to be suspended momentarily. I imagine they will title it it something like The Gravity Hole or When the World Defies Physics. I should keep quiet. I bet I've given them an idea for their defense.

I've already noticed how in some Demolition clips for similar shows they have buildings being knocked on their sides as opposed to coming straight down (straight down is the most typical type of Demolition).


I scan the propaganda matrix in search of television programs on the Science Channel or others
The Science channel isnt too bad, give Discovery Times Channel a try (113 on Time Warner Cable NY - for reference)
Those guys are propaganda central, seriously.

Physics/Science/Mathematics do not lie, only people do.
9/11 was an INSIDE JOB