LET'S USE TALK RADIO TO THE MAX!

Eric Anderson posted a transcript of a call I made to Michael Medved's national
radio talk show last Thursday the 12th of July, during MM's weekly "Disagreement
Day."

Earlier in the show, MM had called people "nutbergers" who hold the WTC buildings
came down as controlled demolitions. I disagreed with that and challenged him to
have as a guest Richard Gage of the Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth.
MM was having none of that but we talked for some five minutes and I believe I
made some good points.

I hope some of you who read this will call Michael and dlsagree with him. You need
to refer to a specific statement he has made. In my conversation he said that the
top of Building 7 tipped over. He must have been referring to the South Tower but
I didn't catch it. He buys the official story completely. Don't expect to convert him.
Just use a civil conversation with him to inform and intrigue his large audience.

He is on the air from noon till 3PM Pacific Daylight Time. In Los Angeles he is on
KRLA, 870 AM. His Thursday "Disagreement Day" segment is on any one of the
three hours. Listen in or call in at the beginning of the show and ask the hour.

I wrote an article on calling in to talk radio called "Something For Nothing." You can
find it on 911Scholars.org in a section about "What You Can Do." Even if you have
called in a lot, you might find some good tips in the article.

At the end of the call, I goaded him into making an amazing statement. In refusing
to have Gage on the show he said: "...I do not want to publicize people who are
deeply, deeply demented or are demagogues and trying to exploit this for their
personal gain." (Are any of you getting rich from 9/11 activism?) A few months ago
he said we were "deeply, deeply disturbed." We must be sinking fast.

By the way, the Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth use the term "explosive
demolitions." I am going to start using that term. It's more descriptive and powerful.
.....They are putting together postcards making the case for explosive demolitions.
I have seen one. Terrific! We will be using them, I am sure.

Zan Overall.

very grassy of you

nice work.

explosive"explosive demolitions"

Phraseology is so important... consider the information contained the following simple statement:

Jumbo Jets Can Not Demolish Skyscrapers.

at the bare minimum:
1. the buildings were demolished
2. the planes didn't do it, something else did
3 demolish evokes "demolition" and controlled demolition
4. 911 was an inside job

Onward.

Great work and ideas Zan!!