Time To Fight Back Against Online Disinfo Agents and Trolls

Online saboteurs threaten to edit 9/11 truth movement out of existence

Alex Jones & Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Saturday, July 28, 2007

You've heard of the Digg Bury Brigade and you've read countless comments from ill-informed Neo-Cons who engage in ad hominem attacks and smear jobs, but there's a new menace that threatens to hamstring the 9/11 truth movement and it needs to be confronted now - Wikipedia trolls who have initiated an organized campaign to deep-six our information from the Internet.

Whether they be CENTCOM disinfo government shills or just attention seeking morons, there's a battle in cyberspace for the hearts and minds and we need to act now to fight back against these saboteurs. We are declaring a cyber war on Internet trolls.

Meet Morton Devonshire, a Wikipedia troll that spends most of his sad little life deleting and vandalizing pages on the popular public encyclopedia website about the 9/11 truth movement and other related subjects.

Devonshire's stunted and worthless existence is given some token meaning by his involvement in an imaginary group called "The Counter-Propaganda Unit," who devote themselves to trolling Wikipedia, which is supposed to be an open source for a diverse spread of information, and deleting pages about so-called "conspiracy theories".

In between eating expensive cookies his Mommy bought him and playing video games in his parent's basement, Devonshire has amassed a sizable list of cyber scalps - research and biography pages that he has deep-sixed from Wikipedia.

Devonshire attacks so-called conspiracy theorists for spreading unsubstantiated claims, yet his substantial justification for defacing and deleting entire research pages from Wikipedia amounts to nothing more than sophomoric giggles and childish snipes.

"Heh heh," "You're goin' down CT'ers, down," chuckles Devonshire as his "reasons" for deleting dozens of pages.

Take a look at the list of pages he alone has deleted. They include such manifestly provable "conspiracy theories" as "List of Republican sex scandals," "People questioning the 9/11 Commission Report" and "Movement to impeach George W. Bush".

Also targeted is William Rodriguez, the courageous survivor of the WTC collapse and a worldwide personality that has appeared on mainstream television in scores of different countries.

Devonshire even deleted the Wiki page for Dylan Avery, who has appeared on Fox News, CNN and in hundreds of newspaper reports. Avery is the producer of the most watched documentary film in Internet history, he clearly merits a biography page on an online encyclopedia, but Wikipedia had no qualms in letting Devonshire deep six the entry.

As the Metroblogging website states, "In order to have a Wikipedia entry deleted from the site it needs to be "nominated for deletion" then voted on by other Wikipedia users."

Wikipedia's criteria for keeping a page on any one individual are as follows.

"The person has been the primary subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the person."

"The person made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in their specific field."

Dylan Avery fits both these criteria easily, and yet the trolls have deleted the page without opposition.

All these topics and dozens more have been successfully deleted by Devonshire as if they don't exist, all to satisfy the pathetic little ego trip that this punk gets from trolling the Internet and bashing the 9/11 truth movement.

Why is this important?

Devonshire and his cohorts, who like to adorn themselves with tin-foil hats, are ruining Wikipedia and essentially editing the 9/11 truth movement out of existence by flushing important topics and people down the memory hole. Wikipedia routinely performs well in search engine results and newcomers to the 9/11 truth movement are being denied access to information.

What can we do about it?

Wikipedia is open source, anyone can go in and edit any page or create new ones - we need people firstly to edit Morton Devonshire's page and inform the rest of the Wikipedia community that this punk troll is deleting legitimate research pages to fuel his own self-important immature vendetta. You don't need to register with Wikipedia to do this, but if you do create an account then your IP address will remain anonymous.

(Update - Devonshire has now locked his page so it can't be edited, but we should all complain to Wikipedia (info-en-v@wikimedia.org) that he is editing and removing pages with a clear vendetta and bias (his denial of Republican sex scandals being the obvious example) - and his administration and editing privileges, should be removed immediately.

Another Wiki troll with a similar agenda can be found at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:MONGO

Shortly after the release of this article, one of Devonshire's groupies responded by stating "We better start plotting more to keep the truth about 9/11 underwraps" - this is another example of clear bias and another reason why these people should have their administration rights revoked by Wikipedia.

Secondly, we need people to register with Wikipedia and create new pages to replace all the pages that Devonshire has deleted.

Thirdly, we need to populate Wikipedia in general and take on punks like Devonshire on a regular basis by voting against the deletion of web pages about 9/11 truth and associated topics.

Infowarriors - this is your mission should you choose to accept it!

We are sick and tired of disinfo agents, trolls and morons sabotaging our work and poisoning the well of open access to information. Our purpose is to put out the information that you won't hear on CNN or Fox News and let people judge it and come to their own conclusions. Their agenda is to destroy, defile, smear and slander our efforts with ad hominem attacks and insults - creating an unfair playing field while sullying open and honest discourse.

Over the next few days we will be creating a "War Room" where we will keep our readers updated on this campaign to take on the Wikipedia trolls, as well as adding new missions which we hope that all you budding Infowarriors out there will get involved in.

Feel free to e mail and inform us of your efforts to confront "Morton Devonshire" - we are sick of this punk sabotaging our work and it's time to fight back.

Remember - e mail info-en-v@wikimedia.org and complain that the user at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Morton_devonshire is deleting and editing pages against Wikipedia policy and with a clear political bias. Demand that his administration and editing privileges be removed immediately.

Another Wikipedia Troll

Another Wikipedia Troll Caught Editing Quotes To Smear 9/11 Truth

Prison Planet
Saturday, July 28, 2007

Taken from a comment on our Digg board for Time To Fight Back Against Online Disinfo Agents and Trolls

Here's one example of a "Wikipedia Troll" (discovered 29-Jan-2007), fortunately because of the change logging it's not too hard...

This was regarding the term "PULL" being used in demolitions, i.e. gravitational PULL...

When this was quoted on 28 April 2006 it said...

The term Building Implosion can be misleading to laymen, although its name includes the word implosion, it is not an implosion phenomenon. Implosion occurs when the difference between internal to external pressure is such that a structure collapses on itself. When external pressure on a structure is greater enough than its internal pressure, the structures implodes. The building implosion technique does not rely on the difference between internal and external pressure to pull the building down, but simply on the effect of gravitational pull.

The link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Building_implosion as of 29-Jan-2007

both references to PULL have been removed !!!

also, http://www.controlled-demolition.com/default.asp?reqLocId=6&reqItemId=20...

Utilizing a total of 137 pounds of linear shaped charges and 50 lbs of dynamite “kicker charges”, CDI worked in only the partial basement to the west, the Lobby Level and 4th floor of the structure. Placed in over 400 locations, the shaped charges were sequentially initiated over a period of 5.4 seconds, working from southwest to northeast through the structure. Following the seemingly endless 2.6 second natural pause in the non-electric initiation system, the structural charges detonated on cue, allowing the southwest wing of the structure to fail first, creating the desired lateral “pull” on the north and east curtain walls.

I then looked through the wikipedia change history to try and see if I can work out who's covering up, below are the results...

"The building implosion technique does not rely on the difference between internal and external pressure to push the building down, but simply on the effect of Gravitation."

Has replaced "PULL" with "PUSH" and "Gravitational PULL" with "Gravitation".

Tut-tut... naughty naughty


Tom Harrison - "9/11 Truth is the lowest form of conspiracy theory, because it doesn't offer an affirmative theory of the crime."


Page as of 10-Dec-2006 18:34 -- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Building_implosion&direction=

Page as of 10-Dec-2006 18:38 -- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Building_implosion&direction=

“No nation could preserve its freedom in the midst of continual warfare.”
-- President James Madison

Disinfo terrorism...

"Apparently, the Swedish Leftists think I am some kind of "Disinformation Terrorist""

Shame on Wikipedia, Google and all the other spooks for their dirty deeds against this Republic, The Constitution and the people.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Spread the word! Many hands make light work! EMA: educate, motivate, activate.
Improve your activist toolkit and get your free RCFPs here http://www.RockCreekFreePress.com

Why We Fight.

Contacted Wikipedia and look forward to fighting these bastards with the truth in both the the realm of the internet and the realm of the streets and general public and population. We will kick their asses. There's no other choice.

Wiki Wars

Hopefully, Prison Planet's wider readership will engage more people in the Wiki War than did my pleas on 911blogger last week. There were a few good comments to my post:


UPDATE: Bad News - since last week they have removed from the pro-Popular Mechanics Debunking 911 Myths site ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debunking_9/11_Myths ) the "See Also" section which contained my link to Debunking 911 Debunking ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debunking_9/11_Debunking ) However, they have kept the link to 911 Myths on the Debunking 911 Debunking site. So someone seeing D.R. Griffin material is redirected to Popular Mechanics, yet someone viewing Popular Mechanics material is NOT directed to Griffins. This is further evidence of a GROSS bias at Wiki.

Wiki may be a lost cause for now, as the CIA's resources to propogate disinformation on sites like Wiki might be vastly superior to the current 911 Truth movement. Perhaps we are reaching the point where grassroots activism reaches such a scale that the demand for truth and justice in America outscales disinformation trolls. We shall only know if this is so if we test the waters by supporting Prison Planet's calls for action on Wiki.


Wikipedia removed not only the main page, but all references to "Fighting for G.O.D." within 20 hours. These shills move fast.

The answer to 1984 is 1776!
(Gold, Oil, and Drugs)

Resolving disputes on Wikipedia

This page has all the tools for getting dickwipes like MONGO suspended from Wikipedia for good: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Resolving_disputes

According to Wikipedia, all the steps must be taken in order for you to be able to take the case to the Arbitration Committee (the guys with the real power). One important step is making sure all these overzealous deleters get listed on the 'Wikiquette' alerts page, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts

Honestly, I don't see how Wikipedia could tolerate an organized group of people who dedicated to deleting articles they don't agree with (rather than editing them to make the content more neutral). I think if people make a big enough stink about it through the formal channels, Wiki staff will have no choice other than to take action.

Wikipedia is a failed concept

This should have been evident long ago.

Senior 9/11 Bureau Chief, Analyst, Correspondent, Forensic 9/11ologist


Secrecy is the beginning of tyranny. — Robert Heinlein

Exactly...Failed....Long Time Ago

Exactly. Why should we spend time editing shit that can be re-editted. You would need a full time crew to monitor this crap site. Why? So you can do it again tomorrow?

Can't Stop 9/11 Fever


I gave up on Wikipedia for the same reason. I spent three days working on the Open Source Intelligence page, since I have 20 years and contributions from over 650 authors on my web site, and found all my work destroyed by a moron and a CIA groupie.

Wikis are important, and I do believe they reduce emails b y 75%, meetings by 50%, and knowledge retension by 100%. The key is to have moderated wikis in which anyone can post, but only masters can delete.

MajGen on video says it was a missile

Major General Stubblebine Speaks Out

this is a barn burner and I agree. It was a missile not an airplane and I am just stunned how America took the lies.

Uh, Oh!

We don't allow that kind of blasphemous talk around these here parts, do we?

Coz the Popular Powers That Be in the 9/11 Truth and Justice Movement have declared that there really was a hole big enough for a jet.

Really there was.

Read their high-fallutin' anal-ysis and... suddenly..... it... all..... makes......... SENSE!

Ow! That kind of hurt.

Keep talking like that and pretty soon you'll hear a Carey Grant-esque, "Judy! Judy! Judy!", excreting from the mouths of babes in the woods. (it's been known to happen)

(is it so wrong to be so anti-Judy and yet, forsooth, admit an odd pseudo-sexual attraction for her at the same time?)

Senior 9/11 Bureau Chief, Analyst, Correspondent, Forensic 9/11ologist


Secrecy is the beginning of tyranny. — Robert Heinlein