Would the WTC planes have penetrated the Pentagon?
When we are asked to believe that a boeing 757 penetrated through yards of reinforced concrete walls at the Pentagon we have to strain out imaginations to do so. Look at it this way...the 757 strikes the first wall, and only the fuselage goes through...crosses about 50-60 feet of space and goes through another wall,...then another open space and carries on through another wall..another similar open space , and another wall, another open space, then another wall and another open space, and yet another wall,aoither open space, and finally punches a large clean hole in a final wall. ...Three rings in all, with another building section crossing the fuselage's path.(see link).
Massive powers of penetration, it can't be denied. Are there any other happenings of this nature that we can draw experience from?...Why,yes...the WTC buildings. They were both hit on the same day by very similar aircraft having about the same weight and speed (boeing 767's).. Strange then that their powers of penetration didn't appear to approach that of the Pentagon plane. The Pentagon was a long series of heavy, reinforced concrete walls each seperated by fairly wide open spaces, which were dotted with support columns. The WTC's, on the other hand were essentially acre-wide open spaces, and most of the plane, (including the fuselage) missed the core. There can be no doubt that the WTC planes wouldn't have done the same damage at the Pentagon as the 757, even though the weight and speed of the aircraft were very similar. Given that we know how large jetliners will perform under these circumstances of weight and speed, having seen it with our own eyes at the WTC on 9/11, we can obviously conclude that NO 757 caused the damage at the Pentagon that we saw, and have been asked to accept.Reliable sources have said that a missile can cause exactly this kind of damage.Think about it.
http://www.911myths.com/assets/images/PentagonRings.jpg Pentagon Rings