A National Registry of Judges Notified of Treasonous Acts Has Been Started- Please Participate and Give Input

As of last week the following federal judges have been notified of treasonous activity related to 9-11 and its aftermath.

District of Connecticut:
Janet C. Hall (Bridgeport, CT)
Stefan R. Underhill (Bridgeport, CT)
Warren W. Eginton (Bridgeport, CT)
Alan H. Nevas (Bridgeport, CT)

A group of judges in Southern California will be notified in the coming week. The following is a statement and template (and further instructions at the bottom) crafted by reporter and engineer Maher Osseiran. I, personally plan on delivering this statement as well as one of my own that hones in on the specific acts of 9-11 and the subsequent cover-up. If people submit their own statements as well as each other's we will do well. This is a national strategy to both fulfill our legal obligations in regards to the treason of which we have knowledge and help grease the wheels of the judicial system to give up much needed treason trials and justice for the crimes and cover-up of 9-11-01. Once again, for clarification, we are not calling for the overthrow of the government. We are calling out those that have overthrown our government, and letting everybody involved know that we want it back. The rule of law must apply to all in the land, from the 'highest' to the 'lowest.' We require that our federal judges look into the massive amounts of evidence that the 9-11 Truth movement has brought forth, so that justice around that day of treason and murder can be served. It's well past due for summonses, oaths, sworn testimony and exhibited evidence in the biggest example of mass murder and high treason in US history. May that we make it be.


Honorable Judges [Names of Judges, make sure you produce enough copies, one for each judge, you might want to make an extra copy for the local newspaper]

I, [Your Name], a resident of the county of [Your County], state of [Your State], and a law abiding citizen of the United States of America, feel that it is my duty to inform you, pursuant to U.S. Code, Title 18, Part I, Chapter 115

§ 2381. Treason

Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

And § 2382. Misprision of Treason

Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States and having knowledge of the commission of any treason against them, conceals and does not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known the same to the President or to some judge of the United States, or to the governor or to some judge or justice of a particular State, is guilty of misprision of treason and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than seven years, or both.

Of two counts of treason perpetrated by individuals high in the U.S. government. Such acts were done with premeditation.

The original crimes took place in New York, Virginia, and Pennsylvania on September 11, 2001; the attacks on the World Trade Center, Pentagon, the downing of a civilian airplane respectively. There is no need to name the victims individually; there were close of 3,000 deaths not to mention the other loses. The crimes I am reporting relate to how the U.S. government dealt with the criminal responsible for the original crime.

The criminal believed to be behind the crime, even though not indicted for those specific crimes by the Federal Government, is Osama Bin Laden and his Al-Qaeda organization.

In response to the 9/11 attacks, the Federal government launched military actions against Afghanistan since its rulers, the Taleban, harbored the alleged criminal. The Taleban, by harboring Bin Laden, were determined to have aided and abetted the alleged criminal.

During those military actions in Afghanistan, more Americans and innocent Afghanis lost their lives; they could also be considered victims of the crimes I am reporting.

The crime from a Federal perspective is perfectly defined by U.S. Code, Title 18, Part I, Chapter 115, § 2381. Treason

After close to a year of research, investigative reporter, Maher Osseiran, has shown with a high degree of accuracy that the Bush administration was the closest to apprehending Bin Laden on or around September 26, 2001, two weeks after 9/11 and ten days prior to military actions against Afghanistan and deliberately chose not to capture him.

Mr. Osseiran reports that on September 21, 2001, the Bush administration launched a sting operation, with the help of Saudi intelligence, which was originally designed to capture Bin Laden; after 9/11 the sting operation evolved into two parts.

The first part was to tape him confessing to his guilt.

The second part was to capture him.

The first part was successfully executed on September 26, 2001. The result was the grainy videotape of Bin Laden confessing at a dinner meeting to Khaled Al-Harbi and providing proof of detailed prior knowledge. My work is the closest to an authentication of that tape put forth in the public domain and the only authentication work known to exist.

Of the September 26, 2001 meeting, when the taping took place, Mr. Osseiran shows that the Bush administration had 4 days advance knowledge of the date of the meeting, 24 hours advance knowledge of the exact location of the meeting, and knew that Bin Laden would be in that village where the meeting took place for at least 3 hours if not overnight since Bin Laden’s family also lived in that village.

Intelligence operatives were in the same room as Bin Laden for 3 hours on September 26, 2001 and chose only to tape him. The obvious explanation is, if they had captured him or killed him, the Bush administration could not have launched military actions against Afghanistan ten days later.

Count 1. Not capturing Bin Laden does fall under the above-mentioned statutes.

Mr. Osseiran’s analysis of the tape shows that an intelligence operative was left behind in that village to alert the U.S. Special Forces of when Bin Laden returned to visit with his family. It is then that the second part of the sting operation would be implemented; his capture.

Bin Laden returned the evening of November 2, 2001. The weather was freezing rain. Despite the inclement weather, two Special Forces helicopters were dispatched, a Predator drone prototype (the most sophisticated at the time in the Air Force arsenal, specifically designed to operate in bad weather), and F-14 jets circulated overhead.

Due to the bad weather, the airspace shrunk and brought the aircrafts too close to each other, while the helicopter is equipped with a collision avoidance system, the Predator drone is not. The drone collided with one of the helicopters and they both crashed.

The second helicopter rescued the crew of the first and an F-14 destroyed the crashed helicopter shortly after.

The capture mission failed.

Bin Laden is still free because of the premeditated decision to tape him instead of capturing when the Bush Administration had its best chances.

But that is not the end of it; there is another incident that qualifies as premeditated treason.

Count 2. Since Bin Laden is still free, the videotape resulting from the first part of the sting operation can be described as a sensitive by-product of a failed intelligence operation that was designed, in its totality, to capture him.

Buckling under pressure from the Muslim and Arab streets for proof that Bin Laden is responsible for 9/11, the Bush administration released the only evidence it had of his guilt. The White House and the Pentagon tell us that there was ample deliberation, indicating a premeditated act, of the consequences of its release; the videotape was released on December 13, 2001.

The one major consequence they don’t want anyone to know about is how Bin Laden would react when viewing the tape. Inevitably, Bin Laden was to see that tape and he would quickly realize that it was taped covertly. He would realize how close intelligence operatives were to him; basically they could have captured him.

The only time Bin Laden took exception to his own security rules in meeting visitors – he went to this visitor in accommodation to the visitor’s handicap (paraplegic) while other visitors were always brought to him under a strict security protocol – he gets taped covertly confessing by intelligence operatives.

The very serious consequence of releasing the tape is that security around Bin Laden will get even tighter and no one would ever get close to Bin Laden again regardless of how honest the effort is by this administration or any future one.

The most wanted man in America is still free as a result of deliberate and premeditated acts by the Bush administration and the second of which insured that he would never be caught.

In his investigative work, Mr. Osseiran, relied on public domain material to uncover these crimes, the majority of such material was provided by the Pentagon. Any investigation or prosecution would confirm the allegation and yield more counts.

It is our understanding that research material, as it was developing, was shared with Patrick Fitzgerald over a period of six months including the final version of Mr. Osseiran’s article. It is also our understanding that such material ended up in a sealed investigative file at the DoJ.

A Freedom of Information Act to the FBI, initiated by Ed Haas, revealed that all material relating to the authentication of the videotape in question is in such a sealed file and could not be released.

If such an investigation were launched the day the tape aired on December 13, 2001, such an investigation, if serious, would have concluded by now.

The DoJ has not indicted Bin Laden for the original crime, the 9/11 attacks, since the only evidence they have of his involvement is the videotape in question. Any authentication work on that videotape, prior to providing it as evidence to a Grand Jury, would reveal the acts of treason by elements in the Bush administration.

It is our understanding that other recipients of this material are the Attorneys General of the States of CT, NJ, and NY. Only The AG of the state of CT provided acknowledgment and advised to contact a U.S. Attorney in Bridgeport, CT, but did not directly take it upon himself to refer the matter to such attorney.

Others who have received the material are the Judiciary Committees in both House and Senate and members of the media.

The lack of action on their part, especially on the part of those who are sworn to uphold and protect the constitution falls under U.S. Code, Title 18, Part I, Chapter 115, § 2382. Misprision of Treason. A list of those who have received the information can be made available upon request.

This is a very serious matter upon which any law abiding citizen should act; this communication in accordance with U.S. Code, Title 18, Part I, Chapter 115, § 2382. Also, for the sake of full disclosure, this effort is part of a national effort to inform as many Honorable U.S. Judges of this matter. A registry of all informed judges will be posted online.

I attest that all information above and the attached articles “Is it high treason or just a simple case of dereliction of duty?” and “Osama’s Confession, Osama’s Reprieve”, are accurate to the best of my abilities.

_______________________________, Date______________
[Your Name]
[Full Address]
[Your Phone Number]
[Your email Address]

Reference material – the attached material is also available online:

“Osama’s Confession; Osama’s Reprieve” can be found on two locations on the Ineternet, second one includes pictures

“Is it high treason or just a simple case of dereliction of duty” also two locations; again, second has better pictures.

Instructions to those who wish to participate

- The following is a link to a page where you can locate the federal circuit court closest to you should lead you to such court’s website.

- It is best to print the reference material, a judge is not going to go online.
- Prepare an envelope for each judge containing the material – DO NOT SEAL THE ENVELOPE, this is for security reason when entering the courthouse.
- Do not give the material to a security guard or a bailiff, ask for the clerk’s office (at least), by law, the clerk has to give it to the judge and a clerk cannot destroy any material.
- You might have to turn off and surrender your cell phone at the entrance, before you leave the courthouse, make sure your phone works properly. It might be best to leave your phone somewhere safe and not take it to courthouse.
- If the security guard prevents you from reaching the clerk’s office, inform him that his act can be considered as obstruction of justice, tell him that you are leaving but need his full name and badge number. Hopefully that will never happen and should not happen.
- A registry of judges who received the material will be started and can be found at Registry on this website.
- In order to update the registry, email me the names of the judges to maher (at) mydemocracy.net – Due to the sensitivity of the issue, I need a working phone number for the person submitting the names. I need to call an confirm the delivery methods of the documents prior to posting any of the judges names.