To save America, we need another 9/11

Uh no ... in order to save America, we need to expose the secret history of false flag attacks, including 9/11.

The Philadelphia Daily News has this incredibly moronic piece.

ONE MONTH from The Anniversary, I'm thinking another 9/11 would help America.

What kind of a sick bastard would write such a thing?

A bastard so sick of how splintered we are politically - thanks mainly to our ineptitude in Iraq - that we have forgotten who the enemy is.

It is not Bush and it is not Hillary and it is not Daily Kos or Bill O'Reilly or Giuliani or Barack. It is global terrorists who use Islam to justify their hideous sins, including blowing up women and children.

Iraq has fractured the U.S. into jigsaw pieces of competing interests that encourage our enemies. We are deeply divided and division is weakness.

Most Americans today believe Iraq was a mistake. Why?

Not because Americans are "anti-war."

Americans have turned their backs because the war has dragged on too long and we don't have the patience for a long slog. We've been in Iraq for four years, but to some it seems like a century. In contrast, Britain just pulled its soldiers out of Northern Ireland where they had been, often being shot at, almost 40 years.

That's not the American way.

In Iraq, we don't believe our military is being beaten on the battleground. It's more that there is no formal "battleground." There is the drip of daily casualties and victory is not around the corner. Americans are impatient. We like fast food and fast war.

Americans loved the 1991 Gulf War. It raged for just 100 hours when George H.W. Bush ended it with a declaration of victory. He sent a half-million troops into harm's way and we suffered fewer than 300 deaths.

America likes wars shorter than the World Series.

Bush I did everything right, Bush II did everything wrong - but he did it with the backing of Congress.

Because the war has been a botch so far, Democrats and Republicans are attacking one another, when they aren't attacking themselves. The dialog of discord echoes across America.

Turn back to 9/11.

Remember the community of outrage and national resolve? America had not been so united since the first Day of Infamy - 12/7/41.

We knew who the enemy was then.

We knew who the enemy was shortly after 9/11.

Because we have mislaid 9/11, we have endless sideshow squabbles about whether the surge is working, if we are "safer" now, whether the FBI should listen in on foreign phone calls, whether cops should detain odd-acting "flying imams," whether those plotting alleged attacks on Fort Dix or Kennedy airport are serious threats or amateur bumblers. We bicker over the trees while the forest is ablaze.

America's fabric is pulling apart like a cheap sweater.

What would sew us back together?

Another 9/11 attack.

The Golden Gate Bridge. Mount Rushmore. Chicago's Wrigley Field. The Philadelphia subway system. The U.S. is a target-rich environment for al Qaeda.

Is there any doubt they are planning to hit us again?

If it is to be, then let it be. It will take another attack on the homeland to quell the chattering of chipmunks and to restore America's righteous rage and singular purpose to prevail.

The unity brought by such an attack sadly won't last forever.

The first 9/11 proved that. *

I'm speechless

This piece is too plain foolish to comment on. It bespeaks its own foolishness. R.P. McCosker

Stu should be arrested immediately

Wow, Stu Bykofsky is seriously drooling at the mouth for fascism to reign supreme.
How long has he been invested in the military industrial complex?
Digg the damn thing up
DIGG it:

i cannot be reading these

i cannot be reading these words...

what the.......

Insane logic for insane times....hmmmmm

digg it

Digg this story. Maybe the author will lose his job if enough attention is drawn to his idiocy.

flood this tool.......

maybe give him a call, E-mail or call 215-854-5977

scratch that Rep, i'll just do it like this: ALERT-if you live in the Philly area put on 94.1 NOW to hear Stu Bykofski talk about his sick column from today. im pretty sure you can listen online too.(hes on right now as of 2:34. he seems to be back tracking a bit, said that he misses how much "unity" there was after 9/11 but that he never called for another attack but could understand how people would think that based on his column. he just said that-"some far left website must be posting this because im getting a bunch of e-mails saying 9/11 is an inside job etc.", thus proving what kind of phony political world he lives in. hes not really saying much of anything. the guy is going on and on about "Islam" and how Muslim people need to speak out about terror more etc. the typical lines you would expect from a guy like this. divert and play the fear card.)

"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." ~ William Colby, Former Director, CIA


Consider sending these folks Aidan Monaghan's news item, appearing here today:

"When asked by Barbara Walters on the night of September 11, 2001 if the 9/11 attacks were carried out by forces within the U.S., 2008 presidential candidate and then senate intelligence committee member John Edwards becomes evasive and refuses to answer the question, after having spoken to CIA director George Tenet earlier that day."

Mention that the same folks as before, in the administration, might be planning another 9-11 shock and awe show for just the reasons Stu Bykofsky gives.

holy shit, im never gonna

holy shit, im never gonna buy this rag again. The Philly Daily News has never been this overtly disgusting. ive never seen them run this kind of propaganda before. Stu Bykofski doesn usually write about politics, hes more on the Lindsay Lohan beat, so keep that in mind when e-mailing this tool and tell him he should stick to Britney Spears sex life or get educated on 9/11.

"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." ~ William Colby, Former Director, CIA

i stand corrected,

i stand corrected, apparently Stu HAS written about more than just entertainment before. send him this article:

Pitching For More Dead Americans: A Neo-Con Fetish
The Ward Churchill of the demented right-wing has a deathwish for terror in order to unite the country

Another feverish Neo-Con has come out of the closet and admitted to enjoying the fetish that he shares with scores of other Administration apologists - a deathwish for more terror and more dead Americans in order to unite the country behind Bush.

"ONE MONTH from The Anniversary, I'm thinking another 9/11 would help America," laments Stu Bykofsky in his Philadelphia Daily News column.

Bykofsky is disappointed that 600,000 plus dead civilians along with thousands of slain troops in Iraq isn't enough to convince Americans that the war should be prosecuted with more vigor, so he's yearning for a kick up the backside in the form of thousands of dead Americans at home.

One could be forgiven for being cynical and thinking that Bykofsky, a plodding Neo-Con hack who nobody had heard of before last night, was just pushing the boat out in a desperate ploy to get a link on the Drudge Report, but reading his previous frenzied Bush administration boot-licking columns it becomes clear that Bykofsky actually means it.

Bykofsky and his cohorts are so aghast that the majority of Americans now take them for what they are - maniacal devotees to a blood soaked and failed neo-conservative doctrine - that they'd rather see innocent people be blown to bits than admit they're wrong.

In some countries, this kind of demented rhetoric is illegal - it's classified as glorification of terror in Britain, and their rants are no less volatile than some of the propaganda spewed by Muslim clerics who have been arrested and deported for advocating violence.

These rabid blowhards should be thankful that America still clings on to its first amendment - in the face of a terrorist assault that they encourage - otherwise they would soon find out that openly pitching for mass murder doesn't sit too well with the authorities.

Bykofsky has just written himself into history as the Ward Churchill of the delirious right-wing and the two share a lot in common.

Both express the uncanny ability of being able to match the ignorance of their comments with the depth of their depravity.

"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." ~ William Colby, Former Director, CIA

If You Were a Terrorist, How Would You Attack?

If you liked Stu Bykofsky's piece, you're gonna love this one:

August 8, 2007, 11:35 am
If You Were a Terrorist, How Would You Attack?

By Steven D. Levitt

The TSA recently announced that most airplane carry-on restrictions will stay in place for at least another year, until new X-ray technology has been fully installed. Surprisingly, one item that will now be permitted on board is a lighter. While it seems crazy to keep people from bringing toothpaste, deodorant, or water on a plane, it doesn’t seem so strange to ban lighters, which could be used to start fires. I wonder whether the lighter manufacturers were lobbying for or against this rule change — on the one hand, having 22,000 lighters confiscated per day would seem good for business; but on the other hand, maybe fewer people will buy lighters if they can’t travel with them.

Hearing about these rules got me thinking about what I would do to maximize terror if I were a terrorist with limited resources. I’d start by thinking about what really inspires fear. One thing that scares people is the thought that they could be a victim of an attack. With that in mind, I’d want to do something that everybody thinks might be directed at them, even if the individual probability of harm is very low. Humans tend to overestimate small probabilities, so the fear generated by an act of terrorism is greatly disproportionate to the actual risk.

Also, I’d want to create the feeling that an army of terrorists exists, which I’d accomplish by pulling off multiple attacks at once, and then following them up with more shortly thereafter.

Third, unless terrorists always insist on suicide missions (which I can’t imagine they would), it would be optimal to hatch a plan in which your terrorists aren’t killed or caught in the act, if possible.

Fourth, I think it makes sense to try to stop commerce, since a commerce breakdown gives people more free time to think about how scared they are.

Fifth, if you really want to impose pain on the U.S., the act has to be something that prompts the government to pass a bundle of very costly laws that stay in place long after they have served their purpose (assuming they had a purpose in the first place).

My general view of the world is that simpler is better. My guess is that this thinking applies to terrorism as well. In that spirit, the best terrorist plan I have heard is one that my father thought up after the D.C. snipers created havoc in 2002. The basic idea is to arm 20 terrorists with rifles and cars, and arrange to have them begin shooting randomly at pre-set times all across the country. Big cities, little cities, suburbs, etc. Have them move around a lot. No one will know when and where the next attack will be. The chaos would be unbelievable, especially considering how few resources it would require of the terrorists. It would also be extremely hard to catch these guys. The damage wouldn’t be as extreme as detonating a nuclear bomb in New York City, of course; but it sure would be a lot easier to obtain a handful of guns than a nuclear weapon.

I’m sure many readers have far better ideas. I would love to hear them. Consider that posting them could be a form of public service: I presume that a lot more folks who oppose and fight terror read this blog than actual terrorists. So by getting these ideas out in the open, it gives terror fighters a chance to consider and plan for these scenarios before they occur.

"But truthfully, I don't really know. We've had trouble getting a handle on Building No. 7."
~~ Dr. Shyam Sunder - Acting Director Building and Fire Research Laboratory (NIST)

If You Were a Terrorist, How Would You Attack? (link)

August 8, 2007, 11:35 am
If You Were a Terrorist, How Would You Attack?

By Steven D. Levitt

"But truthfully, I don't really know. We've had trouble getting a handle on Building No. 7."
~~ Dr. Shyam Sunder - Acting Director Building and Fire Research Laboratory (NIST)

Medicate Bykofsky Yesterday

Dear Philly News:

"To save America, we need another 911" was unworthy of publication. Stu Bykofsky could have improved his work by calling for the next attack to hit Philadelphia because New York made a big splash in 9/2001 and would risk media overexposure. At least then I might have mistaken this mess for satire.

Jeff L

the sick bastard agenda,. .


You truly are a sick sick bastard. Actually calling for a terror attack on america to forward your sick political agenda is the height of treason. Surely you know it was the CIA at the behest of PNAC that pulled 9/11, and that Al Qaeda is nothing more than a CIA construct, used as a front, to foment fear and hatred of the new foe of the American Empire. If you claim not to know this, then you are truly a fool. If you do know this, then you are an active agent of the CIA/PNAC terrorists, and you are cheerleading. Sick bastard indeed.

We want to end all war and war making, end corporate governance, and banker rule, disband the CIA, and pull the military back to the american borders,. I hope you don't feel too badly when the real results of the first 9/11 finally come home to roost. It will not be your 'sick bastard' agenda, it will be a swing back in the other anti-fascist direction,. sorry your boys just went way too far, and a correction is on the way.

burn in hell,
jph wacheski

iteration GAMES - remember when we used to play?.

Disgusting, backwards, and Un-American.

" It is global terrorists who use [Islam] to justify their hideous sins, including blowing up women and children."

This sounds like it could be said about American foreign policy in any case from Viet Nam to Chile to Iraq etc. Place "Freedom" or "Democracy" or whatever you want in place of the "Islam" We have a lot of work to do. When people can't see this hypocracy it is in our best interest to show them repeatedly.

I'm sick.

Moronic isn't the word for it.

This guy needs a straight-jacket.

Censorship on this issue at

Have people been having more trouble posting 911T related material on various progressive websites? The weirdest and most active instance of censorship I have experienced is Portland Indy Media. Heard that NYC IndyMedia doesn't allow any talk of 911T!!

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Think Progress - "US needs a new 911"
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 07:54:26 -0700
From: Styve

Wild that I have twice tried to post on this site in the past day, and was censored out.

Third effort -

Please take these creeps seriously…we are in Portland, OR, where there are terrorism drills scheduled for August and October. Look up Noble Resolve, and start calling your Congresspeople to ask why Peter DeFazio is being denied full disclosure on NSPD 51.

NSPD 51, with its sections on Continuity of Government under King George, could greatly impact what is being rehearsed…could be Martial Law, or use of the National Guard on crowds.

This step toward a Fascist dictatorship could be why these loons think the US needs another 9-11.

Comment by Styve — August 10, 2007 @ 10:51 am

I am having no luck sending

I am having no luck sending Bykofsky my angry reply. Guess they're not allowing any to go through (?). Scared little pathetic worm.

It's true that NYC indymedia

It's true that NYC indymedia is (to this day) the most steadfast with censoring anything even implying 9/11 truth. Recently I tried posting an article on Cindy Sheehan's comments regarding a new investigation, and the post initially did take. About 7 or 8 minutes later, it was nowhere to be seen. The site used to have a "hidden articles" sub-section however that's been removed as well so whenever a post is taken off the main page it literally disappears into oblivion. The fact that they call themselves independent is laughably repugnant. The fact that they call themselves radical is correct: they are radical gatekeepers. To the core. Several years ago I visited their office/headquarters in New York and was taken aback at how UNfriendly most of the people there were. If only I could get my $5 donation back!!

Portland Indymedia is the only indymedia site that consistently has 9/11 truth articles posted on its newswire, however 90% of the posts/comments I make never seem to make it on. A bit curious. The rest of the Indymedia network (within the U.S. with a few exceptions here and there) are not hostile toward 9/11 truth, but they certainly aren't huge promoters of the cause either. Slowly but surely this seems to be changing.


A Complete yellow jounalistic CIA PATSY ASSHOLE

John Gibson hosts Stu Bykofsky to defend "we need another 9/11"

John Gibson hosts Stu Bykofsky to defend "we need another 9/11" column

“We're an empire now, and when we act we create our own reality."