Was 9/11 an Inside Job? Debate Tonight, Sat. 8/18/07 on Truth Jihad Radio

Kevin Barrett to Debate John Brown on 9/11! Tonight, Sat. 8/18/07, 6 pm CT, http://republicbroadcasting.org

I finally found someone who doesn't think 9/11 was an inside job, and who has the guts to defend his opinions in a public debate! John Brown, a patriotic member of the Special Forces community who disagrees with my argument that 9/11 was an inside job, has become my first opponent with the guts to debate the issue on the air. This comes as a relief, since I have long been frustrated by the "silence of the cowards." I have offered to debate a long list of gutless wonders who have publicly insulted me but chickened out of debate proposals, including Wisconsin Rep. Steve Nass, Wisconsin governor Jim Doyle, Republican gubernatorial candidate Mark Green, chatter-blogger Ann Althouse, Progressive publisher Matt Rothschild, NIST report quasi-supporter Dr. Frank Greening, vacillating free speech advocate Professor Donald Downs http://mujca.com/academicfreedom.htm and boorish, clueless University of Wisconsin physicist Dr. Orwellian: http://www.mujca.com/fruitcake.htm -- not to mention O'Reilly and Hannity, who snuck away from my FOX appearances licking their wounds and now refuse to return my phone calls ; )

John Brown is a smart, articulate, patriotic individual with connections in the special forces and intelligence communities--and a student of 9/11-- so this debate should make great radio! If you miss it live, the show will be archived at


PS Don't miss my complete radio schedule at htp://mujca.com/airwaves.htm and lecture schedule at http://www.mujca.com/lecture_schedule.htm

Anti-Barrett-ism in 9/11 blogger...

Why do Dr. Barrett's posts here in 9/11 blogger always get voted down? Do we have anti-Barretts here?

Kevin, you are doing an absolutely amazing job in MUJCA! Keep up the good fight!

this might help explain.....


very rigid bunch around here, though i'll admit to living in a bit of a "9/11 tunnel" myself sometimes which causes me to demand perfection when i just need to put things in better perspective. im guessing some people are just being vindictive here.

"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." ~ William Colby, Former Director, CIA

I agree 100%

My only criticism is that Barrett's opponent was pathetic.

If John Brown had his people listening, then some were won over to the TRUTH.


I've noticed it also but

don't blame 911blogger. It only takes one or two voters to drag a score down, and the site administrators can't control that. They're to be commended for keeping this website a place where differing points of view can be respectfully presented without being subject to ideological filtering.

Thanks Yarrow

I didn't mean to blame anyone, just wondering why some people don't like Barrett. And then I checked the discussion that you and Chris had in a previous post for which he gave the link above. Now I see, it might be true that since he didn't pull himself away from Fetzer/Wood some people don't like it. But the main point is that all of us in the truth movement agree on one thing that is enough for us to keep us united: that 9/11 truth is not what we are told, and the government is hiding something.

I just listened to Barrett's

I just listened to Barrett's debate with this lying pentagon whore, and I think he did a marvelous job of countering his sophistic rhetoric. Not once was Barrett condescending to this liar -uhm, I mean lawyer. He stayed right on target with the facts, while the pentagon liar - damn - I mean lawyer, completely disregarded everything he said. All the kings horses, and all the kings lying shills cannot put the 9/11 Humpty Dumpty back together again, but it sure is comical watching them try. Great job Kevin Barrett!

Show was great

Excellent program. Please contact Thom Hartmann on Air America. He's offered to do a program on 9/11. And his been unable to locate anyone (like you) to debate the official conspiracy theory. Please send Tom contact info for John Brown. My only feedback / suggestion would be that you offered him 5-10 minutes to give his point of view as to what did happen. That would allow him to re-state what he believes.

here's background on Thom Hartmann offer:

John Brown Has Unique Alternate Conspiracy Theory

On the 2nd hour, he gives an alternative theory...Pilots are experts, 9/11 commission report explicitly "covering up" what really happened. He speaks and gives alternate what if theories.

I stopped listening...

When he said "Dr. Judy Wood and I"

THIS Judy Wood??? : http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-558096240694803017


Jumbo Jets Can Not Demolish Skyscrapers.

(No subject)

and by "he"

I don't mean Dr. Barrett.

Who was it? Anyone know?

Jumbo Jets Can Not Demolish Skyscrapers.

I read Dr. Greening's

I read Dr. Greening's analysis and found it deficient in several ways. The most important flaw is that he claims the energy needed to destroy the columns was only a fraction of the kinectic energy of the falling floors. The problem with this is that the energy of the falling floors would have been absorbed by the entire volume of the infrastructure of the tower and transmitted into the foundation. Thus it would be the foundation that would have absorbed most of the energy of the impact of the falling floors. Taking this into account it is doubtful that the energy was even sufficient to collapse the infrastructure never mind accounting for the free fall speed of the collapse.