Globe and Mail 9/11 Poll: Go vote now to counter the cheats from JREF who are voting multiple times
They are even admitting to it: http://forums.randi.org/showpost.php?p=2881540&postcount=8
Don't play their disingenuous game by voting multiple times, though. Instead, spread the poll around the internets to try to get a more accurate vote before it closes, which will probably be soon, since it opened last week.
Here is the poll:
Some consider the Internet, where ideas spread widely and rapidly, a conspiracy theorist's paradise. Do you give any credence to the arguments posed in such online films as Zeitgeist and Loose Change?
(the results so far...)
Absolutely
575 votes (45%) 575 votes
You're kidding, right?
691 votes (55%) 691 votes
Total votes: 1266
The poll is located on The Globe and Mail's Technology page (scroll down, on the right-hand side)
- stallion4's blog
- Login to post comments
waste of time
Why bother even getting drawn in to their (Jref) pathetic game?
The poll is not going to affect anyones opinion. Besides the readers comments overwhelmingly support the inside job "theory."
It shows how weak their case is when they try to manipulate an insignificant poll like this. Plus they must feel threatened by the Truther feedback to feel the need to pull this crap.
I disagree (about the waste of time part)
Come on now, how long would it take for you to post this poll on your favorite message board???
A minute?
Are you really willing to roll over to the scum that's present over at JREF, because you'd rather spend a minute of your time trying to dissuade others from voting in this poll???
To each their own.
_______________________
"If I had just paid $20 million for the NIST report, I'd be asking for a refund!... The trouble with the NIST Report is that it isn’t even science because it's not capable of being verified or negated!" -Dr. Frank Greening
49% to 51% now - thanks for
49% to 51% now - thanks for the tip Stallion
Now it's 51% to 49%.
That's 51% for the good guys, us! 741 votes to 723.
it's the scientific polls that count
I voted. But it's the scientific polls that count. I can't wait to see what the latest results are. I heard that 911truth.org is commissioning another poll. Any word on when this will take place?
JREFers also cheated homoeopathy poll in 2005
Read the JREF thread "Wanna vote?" about how they cheated a homoeopathy poll in November 2005. It makes for some excellent reading.
http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=47985&highlight=wanna
That JREF bunch are masters of hypocrisy
Have a look at what this nutjob posted today regarding where WeAreChange is getting it's funding from to help 1st responders...
leftysergeant wrote:
"If Ed Brown is involved, it is automaticly a concern for the IRS. Is he actually the secret source of their funding? Is it a money-laundering scam?
Word is, he is sitting on a whole stack of money and not paying any taxes on it. Is he ripping us all off to fund this woo-woo?"
http://forums.randi.org/showpost.php?p=2899343&postcount=6
That coming from a member of a message board that routinely bashes the "twoofers" (as the JREFers refer to us as) for "speculating" about what happened on 9/11. Perhaps "lefty's" time would be better spent on learning how to spell big words like "automaticly" than speculating about where WeAreChange gets their funding from to help the heroes of 9/11.
Here's the link to the entire thread if anyone wants to read more of their madness:
http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=91263
Too bad we can't identify which ones are feds over there by looking at the bottoms of their shoes...

If only Firefox would create an add-on for THAT! It would save time on reading through the ever-growing pile of manure on a message board that calls itself an "Educational Foundation" ROFLMAO
Btw, thank you to those who took a minute out of your day to vote in the G&M internet poll! Every little bit helps to build more awareness about what did (or did not) occur on 9/11. The more awareness there is, the less chance the 9/11 criminals will be able to pull off another false flag..
____________________
"If I had just paid $20 million for the NIST report, I'd be asking for a refund!... The trouble with the NIST Report is that it isn’t even science because it's not capable of being verified or negated!" -Dr. Frank Greening