Dennis Kucinich Calls for Real, New 9/11 Investigation, September 2008!

If not running for Pres, impeaching Cheney, co-drafting real Universal Healthcare, voting right the first time on Iraq, withdrawal from the human-rights-abusing-corrupt WTO, withdrawal from NAFTA/Amer Union, repeal of the civil-liberties-constitution-destroying Patriot Act: its only Kucinich 2008 fighting for 9-11 answer and for the People now.

This story is near the top on right now. See:

Down with Kucinich

If Kucinich didn't want to ban Guns, He would be a decent candidate. However,If he remains with this gun banning, stomping on my(our) 2nd amendment ideology, A vote for him would be selling out.

Don't be so narrowminded

This is an old video, and we've been over this ground before. But I've heard this "he wants to ban guns" line from many Ron Paul supporters, and I have to respond.

I don't care who gets elected president. I don't think it means much. What matters, and what Kucinich's investigation is a good example of, is the committee work and back room work. If Kucinich is going after some aspect of 9/11, any aspect of 9/11, then that's a good thing. It doesn't matter what his other beliefs and policies are, because he will never be president, and neither will Ron Paul.

That doesn't mean we have to despair over 9/11 Truth (and that certainly doesn't mean people should campaign for someone else -- by all means, campaign for Paul or Kucinich or whoever you like). 9/11 Truth was never going to come from the president anyway. It has to come from the minions, the party operatives, the people not so much in the spotlight that they have something to lose. Anyone with something to lose will avoid 9/11 Truth like the plague. You've seen the reactions of Obama, Franken, and others. They think they can win something: that's why they back down from meaningful issues.

But Kucinich digging into some kind of financial improprieties related to 9/11 is a good thing. It may not be the whole thing, but it's a good thing. I could care less what he thinks about guns.

Well-said. If he does

Well-said. If he does anything at all, it's a plus. What he thinks about guns does not matter and will not change anything. Once he starts an investigation, much may come of it. One thing leading to another, etc. Kucinich is smart enough to see this and he is probably independent enough to let the truth lead where it may. We should support him on this investigation and supply him with as much evidence as he can handle. If it turns out he is a cover-up artist, we will figure that out soon enough.

JFK on secrecy and the press

"But Kucinich digging into

"But Kucinich digging into some kind of financial improprieties related to 9/11 is a good thing. It may not be the whole thing, but it's a good thing."

no doubt, if hes serious. but do you really think he is? whats this delay about? the timing of it is very interesting as well. i guess hes hoping "the left" will forget about everything when Hillary gets elected(he would be right for the most part). i dont trust Kucinich at all. no specifics and a delay without explanation. not good signs.

"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." ~ William Colby, Former Director, CIA

I guess I would say

let's see what he has to say, before we judge him.

I was under the impression the hearings would happen in September 2007. But I'm not sure.

If there is a delay until September 2008, consider the possibility that the Democrats want Republican crimes to play out during the heart of the 2008 presidential election campaign. The vote is in November 2008, so a hearing starting September may be timed to coincide with the vote. It's just one possibility.

I know most of us assume both parties are bought and sold, so why presume Democrats would expose anything serious on the Republicans? Well, sometimes the system can't control everything. Sometimes, odd things happen. That's my best guess.

Kucinich wants stronger gun

Kucinich wants stronger gun laws(that dont work to be sure),he doesnt want to "ban guns". its too late for that(yes, i know they confiscated guns in N.O. when they had the oppurtunity but its a bit tougher to do that on a national level). i would be more concerned with the fact that he seems to be bullshitting us on 9/11 than the fact that he wants stronger gun laws. what the hell is he doing thats going to take until next September? hes bullshitting us and trying to pacify us, thats what hes doing.

"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." ~ William Colby, Former Director, CIA

Dear Dennis,

September 2008? WTF? Where did you get the 2008? The video was posted to Youtube MONTHS ago and I listened and did not notice any "September 2008" references. I think Dennis was referring to September 2007 in this video.

In that us the goods Dennis! It's time to deliver the goods.

I do wonder where the September 2008 reference from the title of this blog came from. Do you know BrianH?

And another thing....what is with the 'anything Dennis does is awesome!' mentality at 9/11 Blogger?

You guys are supporting shit that doesn't even fully exist yet. What is Dennis talking about? Hearings on two 'discreet issues'? This shit is sooo sekirt that he can't elaborate more then that? Sweet! More sekrits for the government! It's like Christmas in September (2007 that is).

The video that the article refers to is here:

Notice that the truth....even with top sekrit. That's right dedicated 9/11 researchers. Turn all your hard work over to Dennis because he's got some top sekrit hearings going down about top sekrit...and issues. Only two though. But they are 'discreet' so they must be real hot potatoes!


Does anyone have anything more concrete on these 9/11 Hearings Dennis is talking about? Is it really in 2008 and does anyone else find that slightly ridiculous?


i was under the impression he meant THIS September for the longest time. this is the first im hearing of 2008. i said i was going to wait until this September to make a final judgement on Kucinich after i saw what exactly he was "looking into". its pretty clear to me now that this was an election year ploy to get some grassroots support from the 9/11 truth movement. we have that much power that we are worth courting at this point. look at what we've done for Ron Paul(despite the fact that he is worse on 9/11 than Kucinich) and his campaign. Kucinich is using us. hes not going to do anything, im fully convinced of that now. watch as he shills for HIllary the warmonger in 2008 like he did with Kerry in 2004. pathetic.

"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." ~ William Colby, Former Director, CIA

As Did Everyone...

"i was under the impression he meant THIS September for the longest time"

As did everyone waaaaaay back when this video was posted. But I'm not sure where the poster of the video got "September 2008".

Looks like a bait and switch to me. The original poster probably works for the Dennis Campaign and is doing a pre-emptive strike on those who will start asking...

"whats up with the 'hearings' dennis?"

I hate being such a hard core cynic but these guys (politicians) constantly confirm the suspicions of every day people looking for answers.

Can't Stop 9/11 Fever


The federal reserve or any investigation will be meaningless. 911 is a symptom of a much larger problem. I don't trust Mr. Kucinich, he seems to have a fundamental misunderstanding of what the 2nd amendment is for. The founders knew that "Dictators love unarmed peasants."

He's nowhere near talking about controlled demolition. "Specific financial issues"... I guess we should take what we can get.

Jumbo Jets Can Not Demolish Skyscrapers.

I guess not.

"I guess we should take what we can get."

So basically...bend over and close your eyes....hope for the best?

Can't Stop 9/11 Fever

good point

screw dennis.

Jumbo Jets Can Not Demolish Skyscrapers.